« First « Previous Comments 12 - 51 of 60 Next » Last » Search these comments
Again - just wondering what the correlation is to people who actually believe Ukraine is the just/victim party (and/or even 'winning' the battle) in this conflict to those who actually believed the covid/forced vax hysteria as presented by the MSM over the last 2 years.On this board the correlation should be about 0. I say that you'd be hard pressed to find anyone on this board who's vocally pro-Ukraine AND fell for the hysteria.
Again - just wondering what the correlation is to people who actually believe Ukraine is the just/victim party (and/or even 'winning' the battle) in this conflict to those who actually believed the covid/forced vax hysteria as presented by the MSM over the last 2 years.
I'd venture to guess that those who believed in the covaid cooties and the need for forced vaxxing as presented by the MSM also believe that Russia is some sort of unwarranted aggressor (and/or losing the battle) in this situation, again - as our MSM et.al. is presenting.
This is why all data that is put out there, should be signed with a digital signature. For example:
64f555ae7a93faae295b93e61426a8d1a078417ffaa057b6502de6de7b1ad3bd
Only I can produce that. That's just a simple digital signature. That cannot be faked.
Alexander Khrebet/Олександр Хребет@AlexKhrebet·13m
⚡⚡⚡ Russian major-general killed in action near Kharkiv. Vitaly Gerasimov, a chief of staff and first deputy commander of the 41st Army of Russia's Central Military District, Ukraine's intelligence intercepted talks.
richwicks saysThis is why all data that is put out there, should be signed with a digital signature. For example:
64f555ae7a93faae295b93e61426a8d1a078417ffaa057b6502de6de7b1ad3bd
Only I can produce that. That's just a simple digital signature. That cannot be faked.
Can it be copied?
Commander of the 29th Army of the Eastern Military District (VVO), Major General Andrey Kolesnikov
Commander of the 29th Army of the Eastern Military District (VVO), Major General Andrey Kolesnikov
Hundreds of tanks were destroyed and it’s still early in the war.
The Russians used to say "There is no truth in Pravda." The joke being that the word "pravda" means "truth".
Putin doesn't want to enter Kiev in force if he can avoid it.
Why should he have to? If his goal is (as stated) to demilitarize Ukraine, kill off the Nazi brigades (not in Kiev), secure/destroy the biological warfare labs, and secure independence for the breakaway republics of Donbas and the other one, this is a good strategy. He’s keeping the Ukraine resistance penned up in Kiev while he has unfettered access to the rest of the country. He only has to take Kiev if he wants regime change. In the meantime he can keep their airport in rubble and just besiege the city until they cry uncle.
Colonel Sukharev. A used-to-be commander of 331 VDV regiment from Kostroma.
This is an honorable mention. Highlighting a colonel in a thread which mostly mentions generals. He is the cocksucker who in 2014 guaranteed the safe passage of unarmed Ukrainian troops surrounded by Illovaisk, and then used artillery to kill them off during the passage.
Welcome to hell, comrade.
In St. Petersburg on April 16, they said goodbye to the deputy commander of the 8th Army, Major General Vladimir Petrovich Frolov. His funeral was held at the Serafimovsky cemetery with military honors, the ceremony was attended by Governor Alexander Beglov. This was reported by the press service of the administration of St. Petersburg.
According to the governor, Vladimir Frolov "fell the death of the brave" in battles with the Ukrainian enemy.
WineHorror1 saysrichwicks saysThis is why all data that is put out there, should be signed with a digital signature. For example:
64f555ae7a93faae295b93e61426a8d1a078417ffaa057b6502de6de7b1ad3bd
Only I can produce that. That's just a simple digital signature. That cannot be faked.
Can it be copied?
Sure, it can be copied.
The point of a digital signature is that
1) it can be verified
2) it can ONLY be produced by the signer.
You can copy the message, but if you modified it in any way, the digital signature won't match when it's verified.
Hmm. I think I just had a bidness idea..
@richwicks. Anything digital can be manipulated. There's a reason for witnesses, wet ink signatures and Notaries.
WineHorror1 says@richwicks. Anything digital can be manipulated. There's a reason for witnesses, wet ink signatures and Notaries.
You have it backwards. Anything physical can be faked, but a digital signature can't be.
The dead sea scrolls, ALL OF THEM, are likely to be forgeries. Now if sha2 has a weakness and is actually cracked, only then can you forge a digital signature.
Riddle me this...if I am not the one who signs the digital signature, how can I be held liable? If no one witnesses me signing it, did I sign it? Every time I sign digitally, I make an illegible scribble. Is that mine?
WineHorror1 saysRiddle me this...if I am not the one who signs the digital signature, how can I be held liable? If no one witnesses me signing it, did I sign it? Every time I sign digitally, I make an illegible scribble. Is that mine?
They key of the digital signature is yours alone. If it's compromised, i.e. duplicated by somebody, the key can be copied repeatedly. It's a key, and I've had to deal with keys with HIGH SECURITY, where getting access to it is a complete hassle - meaning I never got access to it - I would send a program to a 3rd party, that would send it one to another person who would copy the program, go into a VAULT, and then sign the program with a digital signature then return the signed program to me.
Using a digital signature requires HIGH VIGILANCE in protecting the key.
Witnesses can lie.
Digital signatures work in that you can make the signature, ...
« First « Previous Comments 12 - 51 of 60 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://archive.ph/qiTZC?source=patrick.net