« First « Previous Comments 25,349 - 25,388 of 46,658 Next » Last » Search these comments
25349
HeadSet
2023 Jun 10, 6:29pm
HeadSet
2023 Jun 10, 6:29pm
Ceffer says
Ironic, cause after marriage is when the BJs stop.
might cause young men to expect blow jobs and free sex after marriage.
Ironic, cause after marriage is when the BJs stop.
25350
FortWayneHatesRealtors
2023 Jun 10, 6:32pm
AmericanKulak says
man doesn’t this gay shit disgust you? president with all that gay shit everywhere, just so fucking sick. absurd stupid culture.
Biden is a gift with his unintentionally brilliant gaffes.
Behold, the #Transjester !
man doesn’t this gay shit disgust you? president with all that gay shit everywhere, just so fucking sick. absurd stupid culture.
25378
ElYorsh
2023 Jun 11, 1:45pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
Ceffer says
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
25380
Tenpoundbass
2023 Jun 11, 2:56pm
Tenpoundbass
2023 Jun 11, 2:56pm
Something innocent and sweet to restore you faith in humanity, and take your mind off the Leaky Organ Tranny Commie Creeps for a while.
25383
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:18pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:18pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
« First « Previous Comments 25,349 - 25,388 of 46,658 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,360,803 comments by 15,736 users - clambo, RC2006, Tenpoundbass online now