Political Humor Thread
invite response
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm 2,561,253 views 37,478 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 25,375 - 25,414 of 37,478 Next » Last » Search these comments
25385
ElYorsh
2023 Jun 11, 1:45pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
Ceffer says
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It will create business opportunities for Security Guard companies. The bill only prohibits store employees, not hired security working for 3rd party companies.
25387
Tenpoundbass
2023 Jun 11, 2:56pm
Tenpoundbass
2023 Jun 11, 2:56pm
Something innocent and sweet to restore you faith in humanity, and take your mind off the Leaky Organ Tranny Commie Creeps for a while.
25390
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:18pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:18pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
that’s fake news, bill stops employers from forcing employees to do that.
It's virtue signaling via nanny-State to give employees ammunition to use against employers in alliance with the shop lifters. Basically, deputizing the shop lifters against the business isn't enough, they are deputizing the employees as well to create a litigation trap and also to protect the primary deputized shoplifters.
If a shoplifter 'injures' an employee, with or without intervention, the employer is responsible. The burden is lifted from the shoplifter to the employer. Employer winds up both robbed and sued by a 'slip and fall' employee.
So, a security agency isn't an employee? Where is the language that provides an exception to security agencies?
25396
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:35pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:35pm
Juan O Savin pundit says the FBI document that they tried so hard to conceal will reveal an entire chain of capers involving a hundred times the 5 million with IP addresses illegally used for bank transfers, and will lead to Pelosi, Romney et alia.
25409
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:56pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:56pm
Well, he does have an unfair advantage, since all the vaxxed cucks are fucked up now.
25410
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:57pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 3:57pm
To be more precise, the MI6 mother ship's 25B fortune. It'll be ziplined back to them if Alex the Fag subversive doesn't measure up.
25412
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 4:02pm
Ceffer
2023 Jun 11, 4:02pm
No private handshake clubs of royalists and nazi white corporate elites or dyanstics were harmed in the penning of this article.
« First « Previous Comments 25,375 - 25,414 of 37,478 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,202,361 comments by 14,269 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now