patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,300 comments by 13,889 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, Ceffer, Onvacation, RayAmerica, Rin online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 71 Next » Last » Search these comments
10
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden
2022 Aug 13, 5:16pm
Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there
11
richwicks
2022 Aug 13, 5:55pm
richwicks
2022 Aug 13, 5:55pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
She appears to be out of her job pretty soon, but she'll end up as a commentator on some "news" show.
Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there
She appears to be out of her job pretty soon, but she'll end up as a commentator on some "news" show.
12
Ceffer
2022 Aug 13, 5:57pm
Ceffer
2022 Aug 13, 5:57pm
I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.
13
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden
2022 Aug 13, 6:15pm
richwicks says
110% no show job at cnn, thats the golden parachute.
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there
She appears to be out of her job pretty soon, but she'll end up as a commentator on some "news" show.
110% no show job at cnn, thats the golden parachute.
14
komputodo
2022 Aug 13, 8:42pm
komputodo
2022 Aug 13, 8:42pm
Ceffer says
FACT CHECK: Everyone knows it was the saudis with boxcutters...they found the passports at ground zero.
I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.
FACT CHECK: Everyone knows it was the saudis with boxcutters...they found the passports at ground zero.
15
Patrick
2022 Aug 13, 8:53pm
Patrick
2022 Aug 13, 8:53pm
Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.
Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.
Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.
16
richwicks
2022 Aug 13, 9:11pm
richwicks
2022 Aug 13, 9:11pm
Patrick says
People within our government knew. Remember, Bush wasn't really president, he was the Puppet of the United States.
Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.
Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.
People within our government knew. Remember, Bush wasn't really president, he was the Puppet of the United States.
17
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden
2022 Aug 15, 6:34pm
komputodo says
fact check 2: fact check 1 is islamophobic, fact checker 1 is cancelled.
Ceffer says
I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.
FACT CHECK: Everyone knows it was the saudis with boxcutters...they found the passports at ground zero.
fact check 2: fact check 1 is islamophobic, fact checker 1 is cancelled.
18
Blue
2022 Aug 15, 7:21pm
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
Perhaps masters places her in “young” (clueless female!) category which appears to be a overlap with progressive (to poor slaves) lead by super dumb AOC. Dems are left with stirring useless but emotional topics for upcoming elections. No single working man ever vote for them. That is why they focus on women or like!
Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there
Perhaps masters places her in “young” (clueless female!) category which appears to be a overlap with progressive (to poor slaves) lead by super dumb AOC. Dems are left with stirring useless but emotional topics for upcoming elections. No single working man ever vote for them. That is why they focus on women or like!
19
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden
2022 Aug 15, 8:04pm
Blue says
plenty of working men in CA voted for them
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there
Perhaps masters places her in “young” (clueless female!) category which appears to be a overlap with progressive (to poor slaves) lead by super dumb AOC. Dems are left with stirring useless but emotional topics for upcoming elections. No single working man ever vote for them. That is why they focus on women or like!
plenty of working men in CA voted for them
20
komputodo
2022 Aug 15, 8:05pm
komputodo
2022 Aug 15, 8:05pm
Patrick says
Or maybe the saudis has nothing to do with it.
Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.
Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.
Or maybe the saudis has nothing to do with it.
22
richwicks
2022 Aug 16, 1:28am
richwicks
2022 Aug 16, 1:28am
Patrick says
Israel was linked to it.
It was an internal coup in the United States, our intelligence agencies were involved. You really can't blame it on a foreign country where it was just outsourced to.
Israel controlled all the security checkpoints at all the airports, 5 Israelis were recording the world trade centers when the second plane hit. They were detained by US authorities but left to return to Israel, the video they recorded is still classified along with MOST of the photographs they took.
But ultimately Israel didn't do it, our own government did it.
Pretty sure the Saudis were central to it all.
Israel was linked to it.
It was an internal coup in the United States, our intelligence agencies were involved. You really can't blame it on a foreign country where it was just outsourced to.
Israel controlled all the security checkpoints at all the airports, 5 Israelis were recording the world trade centers when the second plane hit. They were detained by US authorities but left to return to Israel, the video they recorded is still classified along with MOST of the photographs they took.
But ultimately Israel didn't do it, our own government did it.
24
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:25pm
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:25pm
richwicks says
They also appeared on TV interviews and said they were like Churchill after Pearl Harbor; they knew the US would then take terror seriously. Churchill literally danced and drank whiskey till he was drunk when he heard of Pearl Harbor.
Also, there were warnings as to both target and method for years prior, from Indonesia to the Philipennes from AQ affiliated orgs. All of the hijackers were Saudi except for a few Egyptians and a Moroccan.
Israel controlled all the security checkpoints at all the airports, 5 Israelis were recording the world trade centers when the second plane hit. They were detained by US authorities but left to return to Israel, the video they recorded is still classified along with MOST of the photographs they took.
They also appeared on TV interviews and said they were like Churchill after Pearl Harbor; they knew the US would then take terror seriously. Churchill literally danced and drank whiskey till he was drunk when he heard of Pearl Harbor.
Also, there were warnings as to both target and method for years prior, from Indonesia to the Philipennes from AQ affiliated orgs. All of the hijackers were Saudi except for a few Egyptians and a Moroccan.
26
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:30pm
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:30pm
Let me check.
1- Egyptian (Mohammed Atta)
2- UAE
1 - Lebanese
The other 15 were all Saudi Nationals.
https://www.fairus.org/issue/national-security/identity-and-immigration-status-911-terrorists
Also, the Hijackers were long suspected, and now confirmed, to have met and worked with a Saudi "General Intelligence Presidency" handler and safehouse operator.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/911-hijackers-video-saudi-intelligence-official-omar-al-bayoumi/
1- Egyptian (Mohammed Atta)
2- UAE
1 - Lebanese
The other 15 were all Saudi Nationals.
https://www.fairus.org/issue/national-security/identity-and-immigration-status-911-terrorists
Also, the Hijackers were long suspected, and now confirmed, to have met and worked with a Saudi "General Intelligence Presidency" handler and safehouse operator.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/911-hijackers-video-saudi-intelligence-official-omar-al-bayoumi/
27
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Aug 16, 4:37pm
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Aug 16, 4:37pm
AmericanKulak says
Also, there were warnings as to both target and method for years prior, from Indonesia to the Philipennes from AQ affiliated orgs.
28
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:40pm
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:40pm
I heard there aren't enough Dem voters in Wyoming to overturn Cheney's defeat, even if they all voted for her, compared to the latest Cheney-Hagerman poll.
29
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Aug 16, 4:41pm
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2022 Aug 16, 4:41pm
BEN-VENISTE: Isn’t it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6th PDB warned against possible attacks in this country?
Duh! Did the August 6 PDB “warn against possible attacks in this country?” Only if you actually read it! According to the PDB, “FBI information since [1998] indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks.” But apparently, it all depends on what the meaning of “warning” is. Rice gave this oddball reply:
RICE: You said, did it not warn of attacks? It did not warn of attacks inside the United States. It was historical information based on old reporting. There was no new threat information, and it did not, in fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States.
Puzzling, isn’t it? But as Rice testified before the nation, that 8/6 PDB was still classified. Citizens couldn’t see what it said, and Ben-Veniste couldn’t quote it. Trying again to establish some basic information, Ben-Veniste rephrased his question. This time, he used language from the PDB itself:
BEN-VENISTE: As of the August 6th briefing, you learned that…FBI information since the 1998 blind sheik warning of hijackings to free the blind sheik indicated a pattern of suspicious activity in the country, up until August 6th, consistent with preparation for hijackings. Isn’t that so?
The answer to that was obvious: Yes. But the pampered princess still wouldn’t say it. So Ben-Veniste, his time being burned, was forced to ask Rice once again:
BEN-VENISTE: I am asking you whether it is not the case that you learned in the PDB memo of August 6th that the FBI was saying that it had information suggesting that preparations—not historically, but ongoing, along with these numerous full-field investigations against al Qaeda cells—that preparations were being made consistent with hijackings within the United States.
And that’s when Rice offered her latest discourse on how to make watches. She talked about things she hadn’t been asked, then repeated her oddball statement:
RICE: May I address the question, sir? The fact is that this August 6th PDB was in response to the president’s questions about whether or not something might happen or something might be planned by al Qaeda inside the United States. He asked because all of the threat reporting, or the threat reporting that was actionable, was about the threats abroad, not about the United States.
This particular PDB had a long section on what bin Laden had wanted to do—speculative, much of it—in ’97, ’98, that he had in fact liked the results of the 1993 bombing. It had a number of discussions of—it had a discussion of whether or not they might use hijacking to try and free a prisoner who was being held in the United States, Ressam. It reported that the FBI had full field investigations underway. And we checked on the issue of whether or not there was something going on with surveillance of buildings, and we were told, I believe, that the issue was the courthouse in which this might take place.
Commissioner, this was not a warning. This was a historic memo—historical memo prepared by the agency because the president was asking questions about what we knew about the inside.
“Commissioner, this was not a warning,” she oddly said, after taking more time off the clock.
What you see here is a study in dissembling—dissembling under oath. Rice had no intention of telling the public that Bush had been warned about possible hijacks, and she wasted time like a master, making Ben-Veniste ask his question over and over again. She spoke about subjects he hadn’t raised—and refused to respond to the question he’d asked. All this was done despite the oath she’d sworn—despite her public promise to tell “the whole truth.” Did Condi Rice lie? That’s a matter of judgment. But she made a sick joke of her oath.
And two days later, a miracle happened! The text of the PDB was made public, and everyone could see what Rice had done. Result? On last Sunday’s morning shows, a pair of hosts pounded Ben-Veniste for daring to ask Rice these questions! Why had he been so partisan, so rude? How dare he treat Condi this way?
Who were these hosts? One was CNN’s Candy Crowley, in a gruesome performance on Late Edition. The other host was Fox’s Chris Wallace, who pummeled Ben-Veniste on Fox News Sunday. By now, anyone could see why Ben-Veniste had asked his question again and again. But the hosts attacked him, for daring to ask. Everyone knew they shouldn’t say that Rice had evaded “the truth.”
Yes, Condi made a joke of her oath. Some will even say that she lied. But Condi Rice is a pampered press darling. Last Sunday, your “press corps” attacked the guy who was right—and covered up for Rice, who was wrong. Can you see why it’s good to be Condi Rice? And can you see why we’ve so often said that you don’t have a “press corps” any more?
Duh! Did the August 6 PDB “warn against possible attacks in this country?” Only if you actually read it! According to the PDB, “FBI information since [1998] indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks.” But apparently, it all depends on what the meaning of “warning” is. Rice gave this oddball reply:
RICE: You said, did it not warn of attacks? It did not warn of attacks inside the United States. It was historical information based on old reporting. There was no new threat information, and it did not, in fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States.
Puzzling, isn’t it? But as Rice testified before the nation, that 8/6 PDB was still classified. Citizens couldn’t see what it said, and Ben-Veniste couldn’t quote it. Trying again to establish some basic information, Ben-Veniste rephrased his question. This time, he used language from the PDB itself:
BEN-VENISTE: As of the August 6th briefing, you learned that…FBI information since the 1998 blind sheik warning of hijackings to free the blind sheik indicated a pattern of suspicious activity in the country, up until August 6th, consistent with preparation for hijackings. Isn’t that so?
The answer to that was obvious: Yes. But the pampered princess still wouldn’t say it. So Ben-Veniste, his time being burned, was forced to ask Rice once again:
BEN-VENISTE: I am asking you whether it is not the case that you learned in the PDB memo of August 6th that the FBI was saying that it had information suggesting that preparations—not historically, but ongoing, along with these numerous full-field investigations against al Qaeda cells—that preparations were being made consistent with hijackings within the United States.
And that’s when Rice offered her latest discourse on how to make watches. She talked about things she hadn’t been asked, then repeated her oddball statement:
RICE: May I address the question, sir? The fact is that this August 6th PDB was in response to the president’s questions about whether or not something might happen or something might be planned by al Qaeda inside the United States. He asked because all of the threat reporting, or the threat reporting that was actionable, was about the threats abroad, not about the United States.
This particular PDB had a long section on what bin Laden had wanted to do—speculative, much of it—in ’97, ’98, that he had in fact liked the results of the 1993 bombing. It had a number of discussions of—it had a discussion of whether or not they might use hijacking to try and free a prisoner who was being held in the United States, Ressam. It reported that the FBI had full field investigations underway. And we checked on the issue of whether or not there was something going on with surveillance of buildings, and we were told, I believe, that the issue was the courthouse in which this might take place.
Commissioner, this was not a warning. This was a historic memo—historical memo prepared by the agency because the president was asking questions about what we knew about the inside.
“Commissioner, this was not a warning,” she oddly said, after taking more time off the clock.
What you see here is a study in dissembling—dissembling under oath. Rice had no intention of telling the public that Bush had been warned about possible hijacks, and she wasted time like a master, making Ben-Veniste ask his question over and over again. She spoke about subjects he hadn’t raised—and refused to respond to the question he’d asked. All this was done despite the oath she’d sworn—despite her public promise to tell “the whole truth.” Did Condi Rice lie? That’s a matter of judgment. But she made a sick joke of her oath.
And two days later, a miracle happened! The text of the PDB was made public, and everyone could see what Rice had done. Result? On last Sunday’s morning shows, a pair of hosts pounded Ben-Veniste for daring to ask Rice these questions! Why had he been so partisan, so rude? How dare he treat Condi this way?
Who were these hosts? One was CNN’s Candy Crowley, in a gruesome performance on Late Edition. The other host was Fox’s Chris Wallace, who pummeled Ben-Veniste on Fox News Sunday. By now, anyone could see why Ben-Veniste had asked his question again and again. But the hosts attacked him, for daring to ask. Everyone knew they shouldn’t say that Rice had evaded “the truth.”
Yes, Condi made a joke of her oath. Some will even say that she lied. But Condi Rice is a pampered press darling. Last Sunday, your “press corps” attacked the guy who was right—and covered up for Rice, who was wrong. Can you see why it’s good to be Condi Rice? And can you see why we’ve so often said that you don’t have a “press corps” any more?
30
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:41pm
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 4:41pm
Tonight, Trump may have destroyed 3 political dynasties: Clintons, Cheney, Bushes,
31
RWSGFY
2022 Aug 16, 5:24pm
RWSGFY
2022 Aug 16, 5:24pm
AmericanKulak says
There are Dem voters in Wyoming?
I heard there aren't enough Dem voters in Wyoming to overturn Cheney's defeat, even if they all voted for her, compared to the latest Cheney-Hagerman poll.
There are Dem voters in Wyoming?
35
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 7:24pm
AmericanKulak
2022 Aug 16, 7:24pm
JUST DECLARED: HAGEMAN VICTORY.
Cheney conceeded. WIll be 25-35% victory margin
That is with almost every other democrat in the state voting Cheney in the Jungle primary.
Cheney conceeded. WIll be 25-35% victory margin
That is with almost every other democrat in the state voting Cheney in the Jungle primary.
37
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 7:51pm
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 7:51pm
She's got bigger elections to rig. Look how far being a lying, vicious cunt got Biden.
43
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 11:14pm
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 11:14pm
The moment that Trump supporters found out that Liz Cheney lost!🙌❤️🙏🎉
45
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 11:24pm
Ceffer
2022 Aug 16, 11:24pm
"Didn't Daddy teach you to lie, cheat and steal while virtue signaling better than that? That idiot Shrubbie was better at it. I think I'll shoot you in the face."
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/30144
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/30144
« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 71 Next » Last » Search these comments
_congressman