patrick.net

https://slaynews.com/news/wyoming-voters-tell-cnn-what-they-really-think-of-liz-cheney-shes-done-us-dirty-she-has-been-an-embarrassment/

Doomed Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) has just received a brutal reality check from Wyoming voters.

During a segment on CNN, Wyoming residents blasted Cheney as “dirty” and “an embarrassment.”

CNN’s Randi Kaye spoke with voters in Cheney’s district, who dropped the hammer on the congresswoman.

“At Frontier Days in Cheyenne, Wyoming, we found plenty of Republican voters bucking the Cheney name, and vowing not to support Congresswoman Liz Cheney for a fourth term,” Kaye said.

“Are you planning to vote for Liz Cheney?” Kaye asked voter Sharon Tuggle.

“Hell no, she’s done us dirty,” Tuggle fired back.

“Look at how she’s done Trump.

“She is supposed to be supporting him.

“She is a Republican for crying out loud.”

Kaye asked other Wyoming voters in the segment.

“Absolutely not,” said voter Andrew Kahler.

“Personally, I think she’s had three too many,” said another voter.

“I find her work on the Jan. 6 committee just repulsive,” said another voter.

“It’s all a hoax. It’s all propaganda,” said Kahler.

“Has nothing to do with anything. It’s a witch hunt.”

“She has been an embarrassment,” said another voter.

“She doesn’t know what her constituents want here anymore because she’s lost touch with the values of the people,” said another voter.

“I don’t feel like she supports her people here in Wyoming anymore,” another voter said.

“The things that she’s voting for don’t really reflect what the people here in Wyoming feel.”

CNN: "Here in Cheyenne, more than 1600 miles from Washington, almost everyone we spoke with told us they believe Liz Cheney is too focused on Donald Trump and the January 6th committee and not paying enough attention to what they believe matters to the people here in Wyoming." pic.twitter.com/fpV63S8Mln

— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) August 1, 2022

CNN claims to have only been able to find two Cheney supporters at Frontier Days.

“If they’re going to bow down and kiss the ring, I think I don’t want that from my representative,” said voter Dean Dexter.

“I want somebody who has the Constitution first and foremost in their mind.

“She’s got it even stronger now.

“She’s making a sacrifice.

“She is made a stand and she’s saying something is wrong and I agree with her.

“And each though that has a tremendous personal sacrifice.”

“I believe that she has a lot of that integrity also,” said voter Sean McKee.

“She wants to maintain the integrity of the state.

“She wants to make it to where it’s not so much federally controlled.”

Cheney’s office points to her remarks in June: “I’m asking for your vote and I’m asking you to understand that I will never violate my oath of office, and if you’re looking for somebody who will, then you need to vote for somebody else on this stage because I won’t.” pic.twitter.com/zdZ5Chh2sa

— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) August 1, 2022

Has CNN forgotten its mission to lie and distort for the benefit of the oligarchy? Or maybe they are trying to support some Democrat alternate for her seat.

Time to warm up the Wyoming Dominion machines, voter drop boxes, untraceable printing press ballots, mail in ballots, nursing homes, and many generations of dead voters.

https://www.westernjournal.com/liz-cheney-getting-rich-off-hunter-biden-shocking-connection-no-ones-talking/

Is Liz Cheney Getting Rich Off Hunter Biden? The Shocking Connection No One's Been Talking About

Early this year, a story that seemed to capture little notice was published by Just The News describing at great length the history of the law firm Latham & Watkins, where Cheney’s husband, Phillip J. Perry, is a partner. ...

While Perry didn’t work directly on these accounts, “as a partner at the firm, he benefits and profits from all its work,” Just the News noted. That’s important to remember for all of this to connect. ...

The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway connected the dots: Clark works for the same firm where Cheney’s husband is a partner.

“Meaning, Liz Cheney’s husband is making money from Hunter Biden,” she said in a Friday tweet.

Patrick says

CNN’s Randi Kaye spoke with voters in Cheney’s district,

Cheney's district? Wyoming is so sparsely populated the entire state has only one Congressional Representative.

Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) net worth ballooned from an estimated $7 million when she first took office in 2017 to possibly more than $44 million in 2020, according to analysis from the Center for Responsive Politics and her most recent financial disclosure forms.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/11/records-liz-cheneys-net-worth-ballooned-much-600-percent-during-her-time-office/

REpro says

Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) net worth ballooned from an estimated $7 million when she first took office in 2017 to possibly more than $44 million in 2020, according to analysis from the Center for Responsive Politics and her most recent financial disclosure forms.

Which is why she wants to get rid of Trump, since Trump will look into such influence selling.

https://nypost.com/2022/08/13/liz-cheneys-husband-is-a-lawyer-defending-hunter-biden/

Liz Cheney’s husband is a partner at the law firm defending Hunter Biden

Liz Cheney is "the enemy within."
Get rid of her.

Bye bitch!

Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there

She appears to be out of her job pretty soon, but she'll end up as a commentator on some "news" show.

I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.

richwicks says

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there

She appears to be out of her job pretty soon, but she'll end up as a commentator on some "news" show.

110% no show job at cnn, thats the golden parachute.

Ceffer says

I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.

FACT CHECK: Everyone knows it was the saudis with boxcutters...they found the passports at ground zero.

Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.

Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.

Patrick says

Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.

Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.

People within our government knew. Remember, Bush wasn't really president, he was the Puppet of the United States.

komputodo says

Ceffer says

I think she has a future in skyscraper demolitions. It's in the genes.

FACT CHECK: Everyone knows it was the saudis with boxcutters...they found the passports at ground zero.

fact check 2: fact check 1 is islamophobic, fact checker 1 is cancelled.

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there

Perhaps masters places her in “young” (clueless female!) category which appears to be a overlap with progressive (to poor slaves) lead by super dumb AOC. Dems are left with stirring useless but emotional topics for upcoming elections. No single working man ever vote for them. That is why they focus on women or like!

Blue says

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

Neocons who rebranded themselves as “progressive” so they can push for more wars using popular left wing. thats Liz Chaney group right there

Perhaps masters places her in “young” (clueless female!) category which appears to be a overlap with progressive (to poor slaves) lead by super dumb AOC. Dems are left with stirring useless but emotional topics for upcoming elections. No single working man ever vote for them. That is why they focus on women or like!

plenty of working men in CA voted for them

Patrick says

Right, but maybe Bush arranged for the planes with help from the Saudis.

Or maybe the Saudis did it themselves, but let him in on the secret beforehand.

Or maybe the saudis has nothing to do with it.

Pretty sure the Saudis were central to it all.

Patrick says

Pretty sure the Saudis were central to it all.

Israel was linked to it.

It was an internal coup in the United States, our intelligence agencies were involved. You really can't blame it on a foreign country where it was just outsourced to.

Israel controlled all the security checkpoints at all the airports, 5 Israelis were recording the world trade centers when the second plane hit. They were detained by US authorities but left to return to Israel, the video they recorded is still classified along with MOST of the photographs they took.

But ultimately Israel didn't do it, our own government did it.

richwicks says

Israel controlled all the security checkpoints at all the airports, 5 Israelis were recording the world trade centers when the second plane hit. They were detained by US authorities but left to return to Israel, the video they recorded is still classified along with MOST of the photographs they took.

They also appeared on TV interviews and said they were like Churchill after Pearl Harbor; they knew the US would then take terror seriously. Churchill literally danced and drank whiskey till he was drunk when he heard of Pearl Harbor.

Also, there were warnings as to both target and method for years prior, from Indonesia to the Philipennes from AQ affiliated orgs. All of the hijackers were Saudi except for a few Egyptians and a Moroccan.

I thought it was just one Egyptian, otherwise all Saudis.

Let me check.

1- Egyptian (Mohammed Atta)
2- UAE
1 - Lebanese

The other 15 were all Saudi Nationals.

https://www.fairus.org/issue/national-security/identity-and-immigration-status-911-terrorists

Also, the Hijackers were long suspected, and now confirmed, to have met and worked with a Saudi "General Intelligence Presidency" handler and safehouse operator.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/911-hijackers-video-saudi-intelligence-official-omar-al-bayoumi/

AmericanKulak says

Also, there were warnings as to both target and method for years prior, from Indonesia to the Philipennes from AQ affiliated orgs.

I heard there aren't enough Dem voters in Wyoming to overturn Cheney's defeat, even if they all voted for her, compared to the latest Cheney-Hagerman poll.

BEN-VENISTE: Isn’t it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6th PDB warned against possible attacks in this country?
Duh! Did the August 6 PDB “warn against possible attacks in this country?” Only if you actually read it! According to the PDB, “FBI information since [1998] indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks.” But apparently, it all depends on what the meaning of “warning” is. Rice gave this oddball reply:
RICE: You said, did it not warn of attacks? It did not warn of attacks inside the United States. It was historical information based on old reporting. There was no new threat information, and it did not, in fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States.
Puzzling, isn’t it? But as Rice testified before the nation, that 8/6 PDB was still classified. Citizens couldn’t see what it said, and Ben-Veniste couldn’t quote it. Trying again to establish some basic information, Ben-Veniste rephrased his question. This time, he used language from the PDB itself:
BEN-VENISTE: As of the August 6th briefing, you learned that…FBI information since the 1998 blind sheik warning of hijackings to free the blind sheik indicated a pattern of suspicious activity in the country, up until August 6th, consistent with preparation for hijackings. Isn’t that so?
The answer to that was obvious: Yes. But the pampered princess still wouldn’t say it. So Ben-Veniste, his time being burned, was forced to ask Rice once again:
BEN-VENISTE: I am asking you whether it is not the case that you learned in the PDB memo of August 6th that the FBI was saying that it had information suggesting that preparations—not historically, but ongoing, along with these numerous full-field investigations against al Qaeda cells—that preparations were being made consistent with hijackings within the United States.
And that’s when Rice offered her latest discourse on how to make watches. She talked about things she hadn’t been asked, then repeated her oddball statement:
RICE: May I address the question, sir? The fact is that this August 6th PDB was in response to the president’s questions about whether or not something might happen or something might be planned by al Qaeda inside the United States. He asked because all of the threat reporting, or the threat reporting that was actionable, was about the threats abroad, not about the United States.
This particular PDB had a long section on what bin Laden had wanted to do—speculative, much of it—in ’97, ’98, that he had in fact liked the results of the 1993 bombing. It had a number of discussions of—it had a discussion of whether or not they might use hijacking to try and free a prisoner who was being held in the United States, Ressam. It reported that the FBI had full field investigations underway. And we checked on the issue of whether or not there was something going on with surveillance of buildings, and we were told, I believe, that the issue was the courthouse in which this might take place.

Commissioner, this was not a warning. This was a historic memo—historical memo prepared by the agency because the president was asking questions about what we knew about the inside.

“Commissioner, this was not a warning,” she oddly said, after taking more time off the clock.
What you see here is a study in dissembling—dissembling under oath. Rice had no intention of telling the public that Bush had been warned about possible hijacks, and she wasted time like a master, making Ben-Veniste ask his question over and over again. She spoke about subjects he hadn’t raised—and refused to respond to the question he’d asked. All this was done despite the oath she’d sworn—despite her public promise to tell “the whole truth.” Did Condi Rice lie? That’s a matter of judgment. But she made a sick joke of her oath.

And two days later, a miracle happened! The text of the PDB was made public, and everyone could see what Rice had done. Result? On last Sunday’s morning shows, a pair of hosts pounded Ben-Veniste for daring to ask Rice these questions! Why had he been so partisan, so rude? How dare he treat Condi this way?

Who were these hosts? One was CNN’s Candy Crowley, in a gruesome performance on Late Edition. The other host was Fox’s Chris Wallace, who pummeled Ben-Veniste on Fox News Sunday. By now, anyone could see why Ben-Veniste had asked his question again and again. But the hosts attacked him, for daring to ask. Everyone knew they shouldn’t say that Rice had evaded “the truth.”

Yes, Condi made a joke of her oath. Some will even say that she lied. But Condi Rice is a pampered press darling. Last Sunday, your “press corps” attacked the guy who was right—and covered up for Rice, who was wrong. Can you see why it’s good to be Condi Rice? And can you see why we’ve so often said that you don’t have a “press corps” any more?

Tonight, Trump may have destroyed 3 political dynasties: Clintons, Cheney, Bushes,

AmericanKulak says

I heard there aren't enough Dem voters in Wyoming to overturn Cheney's defeat, even if they all voted for her, compared to the latest Cheney-Hagerman poll.

There are Dem voters in Wyoming?

RWSGFY says

There are Dem voters in Wyoming?

Wyoming has cemetaries.

HeadSet says

RWSGFY says

There are Dem voters in Wyoming?

Wyoming has cemetaries.

Touche!

JUST DECLARED: HAGEMAN VICTORY.

Cheney conceeded. WIll be 25-35% victory margin

That is with almost every other democrat in the state voting Cheney in the Jungle primary.

Surprised Cheney conceded so early.

She's got bigger elections to rig. Look how far being a lying, vicious cunt got Biden.

Back to your beloved DC Suburban Virginia!