« First « Previous Comments 62 - 101 of 107 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yes, seeing hoes is not sanctioned in America, outside of the Nevada deserts.
He was talking about your strange comment about after work drinks.
Yes, seeing hoes is not sanctioned in America, outside of the Nevada deserts.
He was talking about your strange comment about after work drinks.
This.
Actually Dan, many women are rather boring, which is why I prefer Montreal esc.ort gals.
True, which is why I prefer women who are intelligence, funny, or better yet, both. Hudson Leick, Emma Stone, and Taylor Swift all qualify as both.
Rin says
Nope, but nice try at playing the shaming game.
Trolls are so pathetic. Always blame the messenger.
Well, I'm not surprised Dan joins in given his weird posts on Taylor Swift.
Yes, respect and admiration must seem weird to a freak who has never been admired for anything.
Don't worry, he'll get over her.
Why bother? It's just a pipe dream, but one that reminds me what the standard for marrying a woman should be. Every time I think about whether or not a woman is long-term relationship or wife material, I compare her to Taylor Swift. Needless to say, it keeps me single and avoids losing half my wealth and my sanity to some selfish, crazy, and vindictive person with a pretty face. And quite frankly, the younger me would have been naive enough to marry the first pretty face that pretended to love me. So it's nice to have a reminder of what a woman should be when you're in a society where women are so selfish and disloyal and geared towards short-term sexual relationships.
Back in the 1940s, most American women were like Taylor Swift and they made wives. And before any pseudo-feminist gets triggered, Swift is no subservient woman. The qualities I'm talking about are honesty, loyalty, respectability, intelligence, the willingness to work hard to accomplish things, and empathy. These are qualities most American women lack today. And yes, most American men also lack these qualities, and that is because women today do not seek such qualities in men, but they should.
What? Most people don't feel the need to brag about having to pay hookers for sex, yet you choose to do it on a one time housing forum. Like I said, very peculiar.
This is called, going out for drinks after work.
There is nothing morally wrong with prostitution, and it should not be illegal. The illegality of prostitution is what causes all the bad things about it: STDs, violence, drug addition, the inability to get support for problems. Make something illegal and those who partake in it lose the protection of the law. Thus making prostitution illegal is the greatest harm the law does to women in our society.
That said, what the hell is prostitution anyway? All heterosexual men pay women for sex in one way or another. If you buy a woman an expensive diamond ring and marry her, how the hell isn't that the exchange of wealth for sex? Does it have to be a cash transaction? So Joe gives a woman a diamond ring in exchange for sex, and it's not an engagement but rather just payment for the sex, then it's not prostitution, right? So used diamond rings simply become an alternative currency.
I take out women to nice restaurants and pay for the dates. Typically sex happens on the third or fourth date. Since I'm spending a good $200 in romance on these women before sex, does that make them prostitutes?
The artificial distinction of what is and is not prostitution is, in fact, completely arbitrary. We live in a society in which women have short-term sexual relationships, including intercourse, with men who spend money on them and take them to nice places. And yes, a lot of these women are interested in me because I have a nice car and wouldn't have given me the time of day in my first car. Yes, women are shallow. So are men. It would be nice if we didn't care about superficial things like beauty and wealth, but we do. So in almost every romantic relationship between a man and a woman, the man gives some kind of financial resource to the woman. This is just part of human nature, and in fact, even predates homo sapiens.
So calling prostitution immoral is hypocritical bullshit, and making it illegal serves no purpose but to harm both men and women. Yes, there are trade-offs between pursuing short-term relationships and obtaining a long-term one, but prostitution is not the reason that the American mating market has drastically shifted towards short-term sexual relationships.
As for the prostitutes Rin visits, I can only imagine they are a greatly different class than the ones you see on the local news -- I wouldn't touch those with a ten foot pole. I have no idea how he gets them. Come to think of it, I've never seen a hooker walking on the street except in movies and t.v. shows. I have absolutely no street wisdom. But if it makes Rin happy, and it's consensual, and Rin stays safe, why should he be ashamed of it? He's hurting no one and contributing to the local economy.
I image that Rin's paying more for sex with hookers than I spend on date and hook ups, but I could be wrong. I spend about $200 and a good ten to twenty hours of my time on a woman before sex. And, of course, I spend about $80 on one or two dates each with several woman that goes no where for every "success". So I'm probably spending in time and cash about $1500 for each time I get laid with a new woman. How does that expense compare to prostitutes, Rin?
In any case, I like going out to a nice restaurant with a beautiful woman even if I don't get laid. The meal and conversation is an enjoyable and rewarding experience in itself. It makes me feel that I'm not wasting my life away doing nothing but work and PatNet. Granted, you do get some dates where there is zero chemistry, and they get awkward, but that's just part of life. I never blame the woman. Some people just don't jive.
If you hire Hillary as a prostie,
A healthy human strives for personal, intimate relationships with other humans,
its my personal opinion, and I believe most psychologists and philosophers would agree.
At some point they and most society agreed that being gay is bad also.
A healthy human strives for personal, intimate relationships with other humans, despite the challenges that must be overcome. This isn't an adaptation of a normal person to a dysfunctional society, as Rin would like to present it. It is an adaptation of a dysfunctional person to a normal society.
drBu saysAt some point they and most society agreed that being gay is bad also.
Just because society majority opinion changes doesn't mean it's now more healthy to be gay. Fact is, gay people are more at risk for STDs and other health issues, psychological issues, and suicide as well as other negative outcomes. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Just because we now have stopped being mean or openly discriminatory against gays doesn't mean it's not an objectively "bad" lifestyle!
Just because society majority opinion changes doesn't mean it's now more healthy to be gay. Fact is, gay people are more at risk for STDs and other health issues, psychological issues, and suicide as well as other negative outcomes. I wouldn't wish that on anyone. Just because we now have stopped being mean or openly discriminatory against gays doesn't mean it's not an objectively "bad" lifestyle!
Rin , who is unable or unwilling to connect personally and in a lasting way with a sexual partner, is a genetic dead end
I'm not saying it's bad. It is symptomatic of dysfunction. A healthy , functional species must be capable of procreation, and raising their offspring. Because humans are such a complex animal, it takes approximately 18 years to raise a child to the point where it is likely to survive on its own. In order to do this, males and females must form a safe, nurturing, stable environment in which to raise a child. In order to do this, the man and the woman must form a lasting bond. This is facilitated by the ability to form a relationship based on mutual trust, respect, communication, and cooperation. An individual who cannot form such a bond may procreate, but the odds of its offspring surviving to adulthood are greatly diminished. Thus the primacy of intimacy and deep personal relationships to the health and functionality of the human species.
Don't box yourself in. You are still quite immature, and your attitude is sophomoric. There is much to be gained through developing a relationship with a woman and creating a family, despite the possible pitfalls.
I also think that Rin has a point with the time at which a bond is first formed.
Also for a man to find a genetically and psychologically healthy wife with beauty in modern western society is a quest of poor odds, so many men forego it altogether. I agree it should be attempted nonetheless, but Rin's lifestyle has a lot of appeal in modern society. It would have far less in former times before leftism, feminism and cultural marxism started destroying the nuclear family unit.
Mell,
Yes, but we mustn't give in to the state enabling single mothers to raise the children. We mustn't humor behavior such as Rin's nor condone what the state is doing. We must be men and point out where our society is going wrong and stand against it. If we just find a selfish loophole niche to survive in, we are acquiescing to the subjugation and possibly the elimination of our society and possibly our species.
Rin, I am calling out and calling attention to your irresponsible, immature, and reckless advocacy of an attitude and lifestyle which is destructive to human society. As I pointed out earlier, family values are an essential requirement of human survival. A man in society stands up for what benefits society and stands against what is destructive to society. As a man with children and family ,and relatives and friends, I feel protective towards a society that can continue to thrive . I stand up for the continuation of our society and stand against proponents of a lifestyle that will bring it down .
I feel protective towards a society that can continue to thrive . I stand up for the continuation of our society and stand against proponents of a lifestyle that will bring it down
PaisleyPattern saysI feel protective towards a society that can continue to thrive . I stand up for the continuation of our society and stand against proponents of a lifestyle that will bring it down
There are MANY more things on that list that are a detriment to our society thriving then Rin's behavior and those similar to him. Everyone knows a guy that is that perpetual bachelor. They've existed forever. It's really not a problem at all in all honesty. So I feel like you're fighting a battle that can't be won or your energy could be shifted elsewhere, maybe where our society is actually a shit show for family values, etc. If a dude boinking hoes and not wanting to get married is a problem, it's probably 10,458 on my list of problems with our society.
You are using a destructive aspect of our society to rationalize your behavior.
I'm not insecure about our societies
I'm not insecure about our societies long term decline, just aware of it.
PaisleyPattern saysIt is clear that Rin has an anti-social psychological disorder,
Does anything feel quite so good as telling another human being that they do not make the grade?
As a grown-up adult, a mature person assumes responsibility for the leadership of their society in whatever way they can.Disregard for the effects of your words and actions on others is a sign of immaturity.
When all of your high school friends have grown up and gone on to raise families, it is likely you will feel a little bit different. Maybe not, but most normal people would .
If someone thinks they can attempt to normalize their abnormal behavior by bragging about it and justifying it on a forum, then it is my obligation to point out their dysfunctionality and destructive impact on society.
It is destructive when a person with apparent psychological problems gets on a public forum and brags about how amazing their anti social , dysfunctional life is. Just pointing out that this person should be no example to anyone.
When all of your high school friends grow up and have gone on to raise families
« First « Previous Comments 62 - 101 of 107 Next » Last » Search these comments
Here's Hillary from her youth ...
Clearly, she's got nice facial features and is quite good looking, despite being a monster on the inside.
If she'd worked out, like let's say Raquel Welch, who's in her mid-70s and looks like below ...
Would Hillary be an AARP hottie?