patrick.net

That puppet bitch had better have plastic surgery, ten different passports with different names, and a deep hole in a non-extraditable country.

She will just be replaced with another Jew.

On Friday (May 5), Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announced her resignation — effective June 30. Dr. Walensky’s departure, we are told by the mainstream media, comes “at a good time” because of the WHO’s decision to end the COVID emergency. But what is not being reported is that Dr. Walensky’s resignation announcement also came just five days after a damning report revealed what she knew before she urged all women of childbearing age to get injected. ...

• There were adverse events in over 54% of cases of “maternal exposure” to the vaccine (248 out of 458).

• There were “53 reports [or 21% – 53/248] of spontaneous abortion (51)/ abortion (1)/ abortion missed (1) following BNT162b2 (Pfizer mRNA) vaccination.”

• In this Review, six premature labor and delivery cases resulting in two newborn deaths were noted.

• 19% (41/215) of babies in Pfizer’s records exposed to the company’s COVID mRNA vaccine via their mothers’ breast milk were recorded as suffering from 48 different categories of adverse events.

Pfizer employee, Robert T. Maroko, rubberstamped the Review with these horrific findings on April 20, 2021.
And three days later, on April 23, 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, “who ha[d] this report in hand,” emphasized Dr. Wolf on her Sunday live stream, held a press conference, which kicked off an aggressive campaign to get pregnant women vaccinated. ...

So, Rochelle Walesnky is stepping down after the COVID emergency has come to an end. But she is also stepping down AFTER the release of the most damning report against her in her career.

There seems to be an awfully large body of claims made by CDC that appear to have lacked foundation in fact or data. Both Dr Walensky and her predecessor Robert Redfield would seem to have a great deal to answer for here.

“The covid vaccine will make the vaccinated a dead end for the virus.”

This talking point was simply everywhere all at once.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla certainly pushed this narrative. Presumably, the fact that he was allowed to do so (itself quite an exceptional situation) implies the acquiescence of FDA, CDC, and other regulators.

Upon what was this seemingly widespread consensus based?

The matter appears to have never even been studied at the time the claims were made.

Why were the usually strict and fastidious US regulators so sanguine about such unusually aggressive and certain statements?

This is a most unusual situation and such an extraordinary outcome would seem to demand an extraordinary explanation.

Yet none seems forthcoming.

“The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body” constitutes another key early safety claim similarly rooted in opaque or absent evidence or perhaps simply assumed or invented. (before being quietly retracted later).

This claim also proved extravagantly incorrect.

Wherever one looks, it seems one finds that these grand claims of safety and efficacy were underpinned by a paucity or utter absence of supporting evidence. ...

Please make no mistake, if nothing is done and this is swept beneath some august Congressional rug or societal memory hole, it will happen again. And soon. This is not a choice I would have for America and one I do not believe you should countenance.

There can be no restoration of public trust until all of the executives and officials that lied about and mandated the toxic slime are tried and hanged for crimes against humanity.

She will just be replaced with another Jew.

CDC Director Walensky's Husband Received $5 Million in HHS Grants - and That's Just the Start of It ...

I have previously worked in the world of grant writing and can tell you most agencies will not give grants to organizations that have existed for less than a year and organizations that have no other stream of funding. In this particular case Crunchbase, which monitors funding for corporations and non-profits, shows that the only funding that Lytica has received to date is the $5.3 million allocated from the grant received.