4
0

so prepare for ww3?


 invite response                
2022 Sep 13, 2:12pm   2,174 views  24 comments

by FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   ➕follow (3)   💰tip   ignore  

russia is very clear on this, they don’t bullshit around like our politicians. proxy war = nukes go.

https://www.rt.com/russia/562734-medvedev-apocalypse-revelation-ukraine/

Comments 1 - 24 of 24        Search these comments

1   1337irr   2022 Sep 13, 2:20pm  

"Hold my beer."- Washington D.C.'s think tanks collectively
2   Patrick   2022 Sep 13, 2:20pm  

Democrats might be hoping to provoke a nuclear war in order to prevent the midterm elections in which they would lose badly unless they can replay the massive cheating of 2020.
3   WookieMan   2022 Sep 13, 2:33pm  

Nope. Won't happen. It's a veiled threat that won't come to fruition. Russia is a land locked shit hole. And yes I know they have useless water front that is clogged with ice most the time, hence why I say land locked.

Russia has energy. That's about it. I don't love or hate Russians. I kind of just think they're drunk idiots. Americans are morons in their own way. Russia lobs a nuke they're toast. It's almost been a century since one was used in combat. Russia would get destroyed immediately. They'd maybe hit Alaska... so yeah. Remember we have allies and god knows what other subvert shit is going on. We probably have nukes in Russia. Not a typo.

Russians are too busy going after a black lesbian basketball player (she broke their laws, not defending her) over pot. Nukes from Russia are the least of my worries personally. They're good at trolling and that's about it.
4   clambo   2022 Sep 13, 2:39pm  

It’s already WW3 and Ukraine is fighting it for us.
Good for them, they’re exposing how badly Putin erred.
I recall bigmouth guys who made threats and they often were unwilling to really do jack shit.
Do you recall anyone else who is constantly threatening to use nukes? The nut in North Korea.
Some towel heads in Iran also like to make threats.
5   Patrick   2022 Sep 15, 5:21pm  

clambo says


Ukraine is fighting it for us


I don't think they wanted to die for the benefit of imperialists in DC and weapons makers' profits, but that's what's happening.
6   richwicks   2022 Sep 15, 8:22pm  

Patrick says

clambo says



Ukraine is fighting it for us


I don't think they wanted to die for the benefit of imperialists in DC and weapons makers' profits, but that's what's happening.


You know how Americans are always talking bullshit about whatever war the teeeeveeee tells them to, yet they're not in the military, and even if they are, they're just dropping bombs and doing logistics for drones?

Ukrainians aren't any different although they are certainly paying a higher price.

The people of Ukraine aren't the same as their government. Zelensky is a traitor, he doesn't care if the entire country dies, he's got a big bag of money. Ukrainians to him are nothing more than cannon fodder.
7   Eric Holder   2022 Sep 16, 10:01am  

ZipperTits says


FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says


russia is very clear on this, they don’t bullshit around like our politicians. proxy war = nukes go.

https://www.rt.com/russia/562734-medvedev-apocalypse-revelation-ukraine/


Yup. And we had a few people here on PatNet saying that there is NO WAY Russia will resort to tac nukes. One guy posted some video by an Aussie 'historian' who didn't know jack shit it turns out, too.



What would a tac nuke achieve on the battlefield? The opposing force is not concentrating in huge formations in one place (nobody does anymore unless they are brain dead). Take out a company? A regiment maybe? And then what?

Besides, UK was very clear that any of nuclear fuckery will be met with a nuclear response, so it's not just our waffler-in-chief they need to size up.

PS. Medvedev is the same guy who already issued "apocalyptic" warning against strikes on Crimea. Since then not only multiple strikes happened and took out, among others, the biggst RU AF base, the Ukie have formally declared that it was them striking it and not some "soldiers smoking in the ammo depot". Nothing happened. Shittested and failed.

PPS. And to give you an idea on how big a clown that midget (he's 5"1') is: during his interview he has mispronounced the word Apocalypse in Russian. TWICE!!! Meaning that not only he was reading from a telepromter but that he's also an uneducated boob and a fake Christian.
8   RWSGFY   2022 Sep 16, 10:18am  

Hey, Medvedev, apocalypse this:

9   Eric Holder   2022 Sep 16, 10:30am  

ZipperTits says


Fear. It will have the same effect as Hiroshima & Nagasaki did, even with less yield.


Tac nuke? LOL.

Have you seen a Solntsepek firing? That shit is almost scarier than a tac nuke, and yet didn't really achieve anything meaningful on the battlefield.
10   Eric Holder   2022 Sep 16, 10:35am  

ZipperTits says


Eric Holder says

And to give you an idea on how big a clown that midget (he's 5"1') is: during his interview he has mispronounced the word Apocalypse in Russian

Oh boy oh boy! THAT'S a reason you give for claiming the Russians won't resort to using nukes if pushed?


Basically, yes. The guy is nobody and whatever he says means nothing. You cite his proclamations as the proof that they will use nukes against the warning from UK and US and that's it. He didn't even use the word 'nuke' did he? So let's recoup: some midget with a meaningless advisory position in the government, a fake Christian who doesn't know how to read the word "Apocalypse" from a teleprompter issues a vague threat a month after his previuos vague threat has been successfully shittested and we now supposed to have our panties in a bunch? LOL. No, ROTFLMAO.

PS. BTW, do you know what Russian nuclear doctrine says on the subject of the first use? Look it up.
11   Eric Holder   2022 Sep 16, 10:43am  

I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. I want the North Vietnamese to believe I've reached the point where I might do anything to stop the war. We'll just slip the word to them that, "for God's sake, you know Nixon is obsessed about communism. We can't restrain him when he's angry—and he has his hand on the nuclear button" and Ho Chi Minh himself will be in Paris in two days begging for peace.
-- Richard Nixon
12   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2022 Sep 16, 7:56pm  

Eric Holder says


What would a tac nuke achieve on the battlefield? The opposing force is not concentrating in huge formations in one place (nobody does anymore unless they are brain dead). Take out a company? A regiment maybe? And then what?


those are dropped on cities, not army. remember hiroshima?

us and ussr both have enough weapons to fuck world over
13   AmericanKulak   2022 Sep 16, 8:04pm  

Buy canned veggies and meats and rotate them. Hoard AA, AAA, 22, 9 and 223. Do more cardo.
14   Hircus   2022 Sep 16, 8:09pm  

This really is a good time to unleash your inner prepper. At least spend some dough on some cheap calories like beans, rice, and oil from costco.
15   AmericanKulak   2022 Sep 16, 8:35pm  

Also, never trust General Officers.

Bolduc of NH, who once signed a letter with 120 other senior military insisting Trump won the election based on stat analysis...
... and said last month that "and damn it, I stand by it"
now, post election victory, says Trump DIDN'T win 2020 Election.
https://americasvoice.news/justthenews/new-hampshire-gop-senate-nominee-bolduc-pivots-after-win-say-2020/

Officers are just Government Bureaucrats. Always have been, with rare exeptions in war time when capable ones must actually be appointed due to existential threat. And even then many officers are incompetent and/or self-aggrandizing.
16   richwicks   2022 Sep 16, 8:46pm  

ZipperTits says

Yup. I dunno where it is said that tac nukes have to be deployed on just battlefields, do you?


Nuclear weapons have never been used on battlefields, or even tactical targets.

Nuclear weapons, the two times they were deployed, were used to do research on the victims. Neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki were military outposts or producers for military weaponry. What they contained were populations largely untouched by the war, where they could be researched after a nuclear weapon was used against them.
17   RWSGFY   2022 Sep 23, 7:56am  

Calm down, nervous Nellies:

MOSCOW, Sept 23 (Reuters) - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Friday that Moscow was not threatening anybody with nuclear weapons, and that open confrontation with the United States and NATO was not in Russia's interests, state news agencies reported.

"We are not threatening anyone with nuclear weapons," the Interfax agency quoted Ryabkov as saying at a conference on Friday.
18   RWSGFY   2022 Sep 23, 8:00am  

BTW, when a guy says "this is not a bluff" he is basically saying that his previous threats were bluffs. And now the latest one is being rolled back....
19   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2022 Oct 4, 2:02pm  

i bought us a generator and fuel. nothing fancy bit itll keep heat on if shtf.
20   AD   2022 Oct 4, 5:30pm  

Patrick says


Democrats might be hoping to provoke a nuclear war in order to prevent the midterm elections in which they would lose badly unless they can replay the massive cheating of 2020.


That is very true. Its going to be harder to cheat and get away with it. Case in point, examine the voting integrity legislation signed by Governor Kemp in early 2021.

After Dems are enough finished with Trump, they are moving onto DaSantis and Kemp. But Trump knows this and keeps annoying the Dems.

.
21   Ceffer   2022 Oct 4, 6:10pm  

Sillies, there won't be any nuclear...........KAPLOOEY. Glass shattering, sounds of human fat cripsing and ashing.
23   RWSGFY   2022 Oct 6, 9:26am  



Tsk, tsk, Westerners, stop this nuclear rhetoric!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions