5
0

So much for IMPEACHMENT - LOLOLOLOL


 invite response                
2019 Oct 31, 5:38am   2,077 views  40 comments

by joshuatrio   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

Name of the whistleblower is known. This whole impeachment process is backfiring on the Dem's. What a SCAM!

My guess is the impeachment narrative will fade over the next few weeks, and the Dem's will try to find some new way of getting rid of Trump.

Trump is going to win 2020.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
Joe Biden: Invited Ciaramella to state luncheon with Italian premier. Also invited: Brennan, Comey, Clapper.
AP Photo/Matt Rourke

Further, Ciaramella (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media. He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

“He was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” said a former NSC official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

Also, Ciaramella huddled for “guidance” with the staff of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, including former colleagues also held over from the Obama era whom Schiff’s office had recently recruited from the NSC. (Schiff is the lead prosecutor in the impeachment inquiry.)

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
Alexandra Chalupa: DNC oppo researcher was invited to the Obama White House by Ciaramella.
Afric Vision NouvelleTV/YouTube

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine."

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/whistleblower-identified-as-eric-ciaramella/
https://noqreport.com/2019/10/30/eric-ciaramella-really-whistleblower-whole-impeachment-narrative-decimated/

WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comments 1 - 40 of 40        Search these comments

2   komputodo   2019 Oct 31, 7:50am  

he looks like pajama boy or rachel maddows twin brother
4   clambo   2019 Oct 31, 7:58am  

He's "the enemy within".

Take him out and water board him; then string him up.

That may remove the smirk from his face; after death maybe the undertaker will shave the pussy off of his face.
5   RC2006   2019 Oct 31, 8:17am  

Lol listening to NPR right now. Liberal guest "Nancy Pelosi is a strategist always looking 7 moves ahead" wtf half the time she is over a decade behind on who is president.
6   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 8:24am  

Tim Aurora says
House has details from all over to impeach Trump

Please do detail the high cri...

Never mind.
7   WookieMan   2019 Oct 31, 8:36am  

Tim Aurora says
1. It does not matter if he is a registered Democrat.

Unfortunately it does matter. It would matter if a Republican did the same thing to a Democrat. It's a clear and obvious bias. If you're not running for office, there's zero reason to ever register for either party. It creates an instant bias regardless of who you root for.
8   Shaman   2019 Oct 31, 8:41am  

Tim Aurora says
rest of us can start a fund for him, so that he can retire peacefully far from Trumpturds in different country


Please do! I love to see Leftists waste their money on such things, exporting their own ilk from our shores.
9   rdm   2019 Oct 31, 9:14am  

joshuatrio says

My guess is the impeachment narrative will fade over the next few weeks


Your guess will be wrong. The whistle blower got the ball rolling, the Impeachment Inquiry now has its own momentum, virtually everything the whistle blower stated has been confirmed by multiple witnesses including Trump himself. The inquiry is not going to fade in a few weeks. 95% chance the grifter in chief will be impeached; now removal is another issue altogether. You can argue that its a bad idea and will bite the Dems on the ass, that is possible but they are almost certainly going to impeach him.
10   offendedsnowflake   2019 Oct 31, 9:16am  

CovfefeButDeadly says
Get the rope.


This is accurate. I hope the hangings will be available on PPV. I'll throw a party and supply the frozen Junior Mints.
11   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 9:21am  

rdm says
Your guess will be wrong. The whistle blower got the ball rolling, the Impeachment Inquiry now has its own momentum, virtually everything the whistle blower stated has been confirmed by multiple witnesses including Trump himself.


The problem for Democrats is that we have a transcript that anyone can read. Most normal people who aren't partisans will read it and think "what's the big deal here?".

Can you describe in less than 4 sentences what the impeachable crime was - that wouldn't apply to Biden and his activities in China and Ukraine?
12   Bd6r   2019 Oct 31, 9:25am  

joshuatrio says
My guess is the impeachment narrative will fade over the next few weeks

nope, they will say that trump is colluding with North Korea, Andorra, or Oceania
13   Shaman   2019 Oct 31, 9:26am  

Look, they’ve wanted to impeach since before Trump was sworn in. They’ve just been desperately flailing about seeking a suitable excuse. It’s amazing that they’ve been allowed to do this for so long with no repercussions, but a good portion of the American electorate is stupid and silly and votes for these retarded apes we call Democrats.
14   WookieMan   2019 Oct 31, 9:26am  

rdm says
but they are almost certainly going to impeach him.

For what? Looking into potential illegal activity by a former vice president? Biden is not on a ballot for president, anywhere. It's not interference. I'd argue by default he'd being doing American's an injustice to look the other way and NOT investigate Biden.

And don't throw out quid pro quo. EVERY single negotiation with a foreign government could unearth what appears to be quid pro quo for EITHER party. You're the fucking POTUS. You're going to know a shit load of people. Any decision could be traced back to some individual they know and then question if the POTUS did it for that individual's gain. Are we not supposed to negotiate with foreign countries anymore for fear of impeachment?

This is bat shit crazy stuff. That's where we're at.
15   Ceffer   2019 Oct 31, 9:55am  

Is he claiming Trump grabbed his pussy?

16   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2019 Oct 31, 9:56am  

Finally he will pay for that Russian collusion!
17   WookieMan   2019 Oct 31, 10:16am  

Tim Aurora says
Mueller is a registered Republican and democrats accepted his report.

No they didn't! If they did we'd have moved on from Russia. And Mueller clearly did dick with the investigation. There were plenty of partisan people involved and you know it. It was pure garbage and they brought in a senile old man, that they knew would just let the investigators do their own thing. And they still found nothing and you and they all know it.

And yes, I think it should be protocol to NOT be affiliated with a party, especially in the intelligence and policing agencies. Can still vote for who you please, but between Obama leaving office and all this bull shit with Trump, I don't trust one fucking person anymore. And that's bad.
18   rdm   2019 Oct 31, 10:19am  

socal2 says
Can you describe in less than 4 sentences what the impeachable crime was - that wouldn't apply to Biden and his activities in China and Ukraine?


The facts and motive of Trump are not really in question. With Biden there are a set of facts that are bent to fit a narrative of what aboutism. Hunter got a board seat because his dad was VP, agreed. Unseemly for sure but not illegal. If Hunter had broken the law dont you think Barr would have been all over it by now? Everything else regarding the Bidens is supposition and conspiracy theory which falls apart when looked at. On top of that let's say the Bidens are the criminals you seem to believe they are, does that make Trump innocent? Is it OK for Trump to be corrupt because the Bidens are? 3 long sentences follow:

Trump demanded Ukraine, a foreign government, investigate and announce publicly that they had dirt on an American citizen who also happened to be his perceived main opponent in the 2020 election, Joe Biden. Additionally, he demanded they also investigate a theory that a DNC server ended up in Ukraine and it was Ukrainians rather than Russia who interfered in the 2016 election on Hillary Clinton's behalf. To get Ukraine's government to do these investigations and announcements Trump set up a shadow government run by Giuliani, acting as his bag man, and withheld military and other aid approved by congress and urgently needed by Ukraine in their battle with Russian backed separatists in order to force their compliance with his demands.
19   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 10:28am  

rdm says
If Hunter had broken the law dont you think Barr would have been all over it by now? Everything else regarding the Bidens is supposition and conspiracy theory which falls apart when looked at.

Why isn't Barr after Trump?


Trump asked Ukraine to help out with the "Russian collusion" story and the reported Biden corruption. Everything else regarding Trump is supposition and conspiracy theory that falls apart when looked at.
20   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 10:30am  

rdm says
Joe Biden. Additionally, he demanded they also investigate a theory that a DNC server ended up in Ukraine and it was Ukrainians rather than Russia who interfered in the 2016 election on Hillary Clinton's behalf.


Is this not considered foreign interference? Do you honestly think it is an impeachable offense for Trump to want to get to the bottom of these reports?

*Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire*
Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
21   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 31, 11:01am  

rdm says
Trump demanded Ukraine, a foreign government, investigate and announce publicly that they had dirt on an American citizen who also happened to be his perceived main opponent in the 2020 election, Joe Biden. Additionally, he demanded they also investigate a theory that a DNC server ended up in Ukraine and it was Ukrainians rather than Russia who interfered in the 2016 election on Hillary Clinton's behalf. To get Ukraine's government to do these investigations and announcements Trump set up a shadow government run by Giuliani, acting as his bag man, and withheld military and other aid approved by congress and urgently needed by Ukraine in their battle with Russian backed separatists in order to force their compliance with his demands.


Here's your problem:

First, we need chapter and verse from the Transcript.
Second, Chalupa did the exact same thing when she was Ambassador to the Ukraine under Obama in 2016 with Ukrainian Officals. If Trump is guilty, then Obama is guilty.
Third, you have to prove aid was withheld; this is tough because Trump expanded Ukraine aid to include lethal force.
22   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 11:02am  

jazz_music says
The transcript is bullshit written by Barr to protect Trump.


Yeah - run with that.
23   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 31, 11:06am  

Ukrainian Embassy confirms Chalupa solicited Trump dirt in 2016
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/441892-ukrainian-embassy-confirms-dnc-contractor-solicited-trump-dirt-in-2016

And don't be surprised if transcripts exist of any phone calls, or witnesses willing to testify.

In any case, despite the Soviet Style impeachment hearings that will hold back exculpatory evidence in the House, it still has to go to the Senate for the trial. That's when the FUN will begin.
24   rdm   2019 Oct 31, 11:18am  

NoCoupForYou says
First, we need chapter and verse from the Transcript.
Second, Chalupa did the exact same thing when she was Ambassador to the Ukraine under Obama in 2016 with Ukrainian Officals. If Trump is guilty, then Obama is guilty.
Third, you have to prove aid was withheld; this is tough because Trump expanded Ukraine aid to include lethal force.


As has been said it is not a transcript more of a summery and it is damning, one can only imagine what the transcript says. But I agree the congress should be able to see the actual transcript that they stashed in the top secret server as soon as the Trumpies realized Donald just self-impeached in plain view of all who listened to the phone call. He is an imbecile. Have I said that before?

Obama, Obama, Obama the highly corrupt Nego with his uppity tan suit and fake harmonious family and allegedly well endowed wife Ha Ha

Yep Trump did expand aid, dude that is the carrot then comes the stick, you aint gettin it unless you do what I want you to do, that is make a public statement I can use in sound bites to smear Biden, basic blackmail 101.
25   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 11:20am  

jazz_music says
The transcript is bullshit

Because it's not incriminating.
26   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 11:22am  

jazz_music says

7 of our intelligence agencies say they know this to be true.

Which 7? What about the other 10?
27   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 11:24am  

rdm says
He is an imbecile. Have I said that before?

Yeah, you said that before.
28   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 11:26am  

jazz_music says
Perhaps we should somehow get an actual transcript instead of a Barr-created shit show.


I believe there were 4 professional stenographers with security clearance that transcribed the phone call. After the call, they all get together and agree to a final transcript.

Are you suggesting that Barr or Trump got to all 4 stenographers to edit the transcript?

Vindmen claims there were other things said not included in the transcript. But his claims are refuted by the 4 stenographers who agreed to the final transcript.
29   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 31, 11:28am  

It's basically a Democrat replay of the Blasey Ford strategy against Kavanaugh. Get a severe sufferer of TDS (or KDS) to make baseless and/or unverifiable accusations in hopes of creating enough of a furor among others with TDS that the target backs down.
30   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 11:29am  

rdm says

Yep Trump did expand aid, dude that is the carrot then comes the stick, you aint gettin it unless you do what I want you to do, that is make a public statement I can use in sound bites to smear Biden, basic blackmail 101.

Found the sound bite to smear Biden:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DUXA--dj2-CY&ved=2ahUKEwiC3IbLj8flAhWQhJ4KHR5rARUQo7QBMAF6BAgAEAQ&usg=AOvVaw0JDTvD7HxO64zMat8E3qrO

That is way more blatant than any "quid pro quo" between Trump and Ukraine.
31   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 11:31am  

SunnyvaleCA says
It's basically a Democrat replay of the Blasey Ford strategy against Kavanaugh. Get a sever sufferer of TDS (or KDS) to make baseless and/or unverifiable accusations in hopes of creating enough of a furor among others with TDS that the target backs down.


I think it will only serve to radicalize and motivate Trump supporters and Independents to vote for Trump next year. I know alot of moderate and apolitical people who were sickened by what the Democrats did to Kavanaugh.

Normal people can see through the bullshit.
32   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 31, 11:49am  

What laws were broken?

Here's a hypothetical:
"Listen, Pakistan. If you let the Chinese fly over your country to bomb India, we're stopping all your aid money."
"Listen, Columbia, if you don't cooperate with turning over all evidence on Alfonso Rodriguez, elected Sheriff of Miami-Dade, and his connections with the Chupacabra Cartel, we're withholding the next Surplus US Military equipment shipment."

OMG! Quid Pro Quo! The President can't doooooooo that....

Of course Presidents have been doing that since the beginning of time. If that's an impeachable offense, then we're going to have major foreign policy crises not get responded to when Congress isn't in session.
33   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 11:57am  

Bernie needs to be impeached!


"Sanders floats leveraging aid to Israel to push for policy changes with Palestinians"
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/467772-sanders-floats-leveraging-aid-to-israel-to-push-for-policy-changes

Democrats like Sanders have alot of anti-semite and Islamist constituents - and if they want their votes next year, Sanders needs to show he is being tough on Israel and threaten to withhold aid.

Quid Pro Quo!!!
34   joshuatrio   2019 Oct 31, 12:00pm  

LOL! Only 36% of Americans support impeachment.

Of independents, only 22% support it (oh shit Dem's).

https://www.wnd.com/2019/10/poll-shows-just-36-favor-impeachment-vote/

Given the split in our country, I think it shows Americans are not convinced.

Dem's have been after Trump since the beginning. FACT.

This clown show is only setting the stage for a Trump landslide in 2020.

The Dem's are digging themselves a grave with this bullshit.
35   socal2   2019 Oct 31, 12:37pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
They should be told exactly what is meant by impeachment in the question posed.


Oookay - then I suppose the survey should also clearly define what the supposed crime is that is worth impeachment and include the transcript of the call.
36   Onvacation   2019 Oct 31, 2:59pm  

jazz_music says
total and complete exoneration

From what? What charges have Trump been charged with to be exonerated from?

Trump opponents should spend more time finding a candidate whose platform is something other than " Orange man bad". Tulsi would work, but she is against corruption and the endless wars so the corporations won't back her.
37   theoakman   2019 Oct 31, 3:54pm  

You know, at some point there, might actually be something he does that should get him impeached. But by that time, everyone will be sick of the nonsensical manufactured accusations. They tried it during the election with the dozen women who were "assaulted" by Trump and magically disappeared the day he got elected. They tried it with Kavanuagh multiple times now. They tried it with Mueller. They have something new every 2 months. No one ever told them the story of the boy who cried wolf.
38   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 31, 5:17pm  

Alexis de Tocqueville observed in 1835: “A decline of public morals in the United States will probably be marked by the abuse of the power of impeachment as a means of crushing political adversaries or ejecting them from office.”
39   steverbeaver   2019 Oct 31, 8:20pm  

Surely, this will be the end of Drumpf. I'm just glad they at least made formal progress to their end and stopped blue-balling me.
40   joshuatrio   2019 Nov 1, 9:03am  

theoakman says

You know, at some point there, might actually be something he does that should get him impeached. But by that time, everyone will be sick of the nonsensical manufactured accusations. They tried it during the election with the dozen women who were "assaulted" by Trump and magically disappeared the day he got elected. They tried it with Kavanuagh multiple times now. They tried it with Mueller. They have something new every 2 months. No one ever told them the story of the boy who cried wolf.


This.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions