patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,192,738 comments by 13,872 users - richwicks online now
Gotta say... It's been rigged for Biden since the beginning.
invite response
2019 Oct 23, 4:38pm 2,751 views 62 comments
« First « Previous Comments 23 - 62 of 62 Search these comments
23
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 23, 10:08pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 23, 10:08pm
Onvacation says
There's a guy, Mykeru, who used to be a typical leftist. I found him through skeptic boards. But he went to Occupy DC and saw all the SJW bullshit - he has a great story of strong, independent women feminists fleeing in terror after being "mansplained" that if they didn't lock up their treats, rats would come. Much of the protesters were all about Patriarchy, Capitalism, etc. which is one of the reasons it failed royally. Of course they all fled to men to rid them of the upteen rats rummaging through their cookies and crackers. Then SJWs targeted skeptic/atheist conferences with "presentations" (wikipedia based talks) about why EvoBio was unscientific and oppressive.
His stuff might still be up on Youtube...
https://www.youtube.com/user/MykeruMedia/videos
It dawned on me the other day that this all started with the occupy wall street movement. They were the trojan horse to make it legal to squat in a tent in a public park, survive on petty theft, and shit in the bushes
There's a guy, Mykeru, who used to be a typical leftist. I found him through skeptic boards. But he went to Occupy DC and saw all the SJW bullshit - he has a great story of strong, independent women feminists fleeing in terror after being "mansplained" that if they didn't lock up their treats, rats would come. Much of the protesters were all about Patriarchy, Capitalism, etc. which is one of the reasons it failed royally. Of course they all fled to men to rid them of the upteen rats rummaging through their cookies and crackers. Then SJWs targeted skeptic/atheist conferences with "presentations" (wikipedia based talks) about why EvoBio was unscientific and oppressive.
His stuff might still be up on Youtube...
https://www.youtube.com/user/MykeruMedia/videos
24
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 23, 10:35pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 23, 10:35pm
ignoreme says
Agreed. My wokeness started with the above mentioned SJW Far Left infiltration of Skeptic stuff which I was more into about a decade ago, when I was first on this forum.
But over time I realized Aristotle is right, everything in balance. With no Touchstone of a few points of widely accepted behavior, society cannot function: Thatcher was wrong on this one point. Religion or Philosophy can enforce it, but it has to receive at least token endorsement from the Cultural Heights; the opposite is now happening. Places like Singapore are overwhelmingly Chinese to start with, and even Lee Kwan Yeu had issues with Muslims, which he frankly and gruffly remarked about on several occasions, including in his own books about his life and governing Singapore.
Back to Occupy - you've ( @ignoreme ) correctly ID'd the time frame, which was 2008-2010. That's when Free Speech and Free Inquiry, once a solid value of America and the Far Left in particular, began to be rejected by the Left and spread into the mainstream via their enclaves in SFBA (Tech), LA (Hollywood), and NYC (Corp HQs, Publishing, Legacy Media). It's still contained for now, having only infected the 15-20% of the mostly Left in this country.
One thing the Classic Internet of Newsgroups, Geocities, etc. era agreed upon was Free Speech and totally Free Inquiry. Most users, who were heavily Libertarians, Liberals, most Leftists (other than a pitiful few 50s-60s Red Doper Diaper Baby unrepentant Communists), and non-hyper Fundy Conservatives could all agree on that. But this is no longer the dominant paradigm; it is now maybe a bare majority of users but not the Cultural/Tech Commanding Heights.
From the NBA to Hollywood to Google to CNN, there's a clear push way beyond tolerance of Gays or Genderbenders into actual promotion of it, while they kowtow to Chinese Authoritarianism for the money. Colleges were on board before this, and now WokeyDokey it's a force in K12 even in Southern States.
There's a movie called "This Film has not yet been Rated".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Film_Is_Not_Yet_Rated
In 2006, films were refused ratings for a single lesbian kiss - no violence, no gratuitous sex, no cursewords. Today, no film can be made without a token minority of every group, alternative lifestyle practicioners, even if the setting/story/audience makes it out-of-place. Every other franchise is rebooted as completely female, Ghostbusters and soon, 007. No matter that the audience is for a genre that's overwhelmingly male. And when they flop, the Hollywood Execs blame the Public, which is unheard of in the entire history of Hollywood. Indeed they did everything possible to AVOID offending the Public. And not just in the days of John Wayne. Master and Commander substitutes the American opponent in the book with a French one, when most people really wouldn't give a shit, then or now.
In short, we have Big Media, Big Tech, etc. actually telling the vast majority of the audience to go Fuck Themselves.
The international audience is excuse is bullshit because the Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, etc. are way less into Race/LGBTQ Wokey Doke that the typical median American family.
I agree with social2. The social issues can’t be ignored. We are basically at this point in completely uncharted waters in terms of acceptable social norms.
Agreed. My wokeness started with the above mentioned SJW Far Left infiltration of Skeptic stuff which I was more into about a decade ago, when I was first on this forum.
But over time I realized Aristotle is right, everything in balance. With no Touchstone of a few points of widely accepted behavior, society cannot function: Thatcher was wrong on this one point. Religion or Philosophy can enforce it, but it has to receive at least token endorsement from the Cultural Heights; the opposite is now happening. Places like Singapore are overwhelmingly Chinese to start with, and even Lee Kwan Yeu had issues with Muslims, which he frankly and gruffly remarked about on several occasions, including in his own books about his life and governing Singapore.
Back to Occupy - you've ( @ignoreme ) correctly ID'd the time frame, which was 2008-2010. That's when Free Speech and Free Inquiry, once a solid value of America and the Far Left in particular, began to be rejected by the Left and spread into the mainstream via their enclaves in SFBA (Tech), LA (Hollywood), and NYC (Corp HQs, Publishing, Legacy Media). It's still contained for now, having only infected the 15-20% of the mostly Left in this country.
One thing the Classic Internet of Newsgroups, Geocities, etc. era agreed upon was Free Speech and totally Free Inquiry. Most users, who were heavily Libertarians, Liberals, most Leftists (other than a pitiful few 50s-60s Red Doper Diaper Baby unrepentant Communists), and non-hyper Fundy Conservatives could all agree on that. But this is no longer the dominant paradigm; it is now maybe a bare majority of users but not the Cultural/Tech Commanding Heights.
From the NBA to Hollywood to Google to CNN, there's a clear push way beyond tolerance of Gays or Genderbenders into actual promotion of it, while they kowtow to Chinese Authoritarianism for the money. Colleges were on board before this, and now WokeyDokey it's a force in K12 even in Southern States.
There's a movie called "This Film has not yet been Rated".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Film_Is_Not_Yet_Rated
In 2006, films were refused ratings for a single lesbian kiss - no violence, no gratuitous sex, no cursewords. Today, no film can be made without a token minority of every group, alternative lifestyle practicioners, even if the setting/story/audience makes it out-of-place. Every other franchise is rebooted as completely female, Ghostbusters and soon, 007. No matter that the audience is for a genre that's overwhelmingly male. And when they flop, the Hollywood Execs blame the Public, which is unheard of in the entire history of Hollywood. Indeed they did everything possible to AVOID offending the Public. And not just in the days of John Wayne. Master and Commander substitutes the American opponent in the book with a French one, when most people really wouldn't give a shit, then or now.
In short, we have Big Media, Big Tech, etc. actually telling the vast majority of the audience to go Fuck Themselves.
The international audience is excuse is bullshit because the Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, etc. are way less into Race/LGBTQ Wokey Doke that the typical median American family.
26
komputodo
2019 Oct 23, 11:09pm
komputodo
2019 Oct 23, 11:09pm
richwicks says
He's the medias darling still...If he could run again, He could beat TRUMP.
richwicks says
Who is WE? The never Trumpers would be estatic if Obama could run.
Obama isn't remembered fondly.
He's the medias darling still...If he could run again, He could beat TRUMP.
richwicks says
You think we want a 3rd term of that man
Who is WE? The never Trumpers would be estatic if Obama could run.
27
ignoreme
2019 Oct 24, 6:17am
richwicks says
This is a joke right? The internet is the greatest tracking and social control tool ever invented. NSA has backdoors into every major site on the internet. You know so much about propaganda, you must have read Robert Epstein's study on search engine manipulation of search results to influence voter opinion? It's chilling.
And what's the tradeoff we made, what is the benefit we are getting for creating this powerful technology and using it? Freedom to communicate? Nope. Totalitarian governments easily cut off free communication for their populations. Think that only applies to China, Russia, and the AXIS of EVIL? Nope, western governments jail people for expressing un-woke communication on the internet. But that can't happen in the good old USA right? Just wait, already people are routinely demonetized, shadow banned, out right banned, have their DNS hosting turned off, even have their credit card processing turned off.
But muh blockchain!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I can't.
richwicks says
And in your last sentence you've finally gotten the point, although not sure you meant to. Why is Christianity and christian values under such heavy attack? Think it's not? Read the 10 commandments, there's not one you can tell people to follow anymore without offending someone because of your un-woke white privilege. This is by design. A community cannot be formed without shared values. For 2000 years, with various degrees of success and fidelity, Christianity has offered a framework for people to live by and to form communities around. This is why every government for 2000 years has tried to subvert it.
More importantly in particular, with the Renaissance and enlightenment, Christianity was the moral framework around which western civilization as we know it today was formed. Now it is under attack and losing relevance extremely rapidly. What comes after? Who knows. What we can say is that in the 20th century, when a government tried and succeeded in suppressing Christianity, most of the time totalitarianism followed.
This is why the social issues matter. If the government and the media succeed in this culture war (and they are winning it currently), there's not going to be any communities to challenge it.
You really don't know what sort of progress there has been with the Internet. There's been a lot. I've been on it 30 years. It's changed the world for the better.
This is a joke right? The internet is the greatest tracking and social control tool ever invented. NSA has backdoors into every major site on the internet. You know so much about propaganda, you must have read Robert Epstein's study on search engine manipulation of search results to influence voter opinion? It's chilling.
And what's the tradeoff we made, what is the benefit we are getting for creating this powerful technology and using it? Freedom to communicate? Nope. Totalitarian governments easily cut off free communication for their populations. Think that only applies to China, Russia, and the AXIS of EVIL? Nope, western governments jail people for expressing un-woke communication on the internet. But that can't happen in the good old USA right? Just wait, already people are routinely demonetized, shadow banned, out right banned, have their DNS hosting turned off, even have their credit card processing turned off.
But muh blockchain!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I can't.
richwicks says
Communities were intentionally destroyed - well, form one. Church might be a good place to start and I'm saying this as an atheist.
And in your last sentence you've finally gotten the point, although not sure you meant to. Why is Christianity and christian values under such heavy attack? Think it's not? Read the 10 commandments, there's not one you can tell people to follow anymore without offending someone because of your un-woke white privilege. This is by design. A community cannot be formed without shared values. For 2000 years, with various degrees of success and fidelity, Christianity has offered a framework for people to live by and to form communities around. This is why every government for 2000 years has tried to subvert it.
More importantly in particular, with the Renaissance and enlightenment, Christianity was the moral framework around which western civilization as we know it today was formed. Now it is under attack and losing relevance extremely rapidly. What comes after? Who knows. What we can say is that in the 20th century, when a government tried and succeeded in suppressing Christianity, most of the time totalitarianism followed.
This is why the social issues matter. If the government and the media succeed in this culture war (and they are winning it currently), there's not going to be any communities to challenge it.
28
marcus
2019 Oct 24, 7:02am
marcus
2019 Oct 24, 7:02am
socal2 says
This is mostly promotion of bullshit to get more social conservatives to go along with the right wing side.
I'm actually pretty darn conservative on social issues. I'm somewhat homophobic, as much as I try to override that with logic. I thought gay marriage was not necessary - that civil union was enough (without the word marriage - but the same thing - of course they're going to call themselves married so whatever). SJWs annoy the hell out of me. They go too far and are often mindless.
SJWs are something like 16% of democrats, at most. As for having a place (usually a single person use restroom) for trannys to use restroom, that was just being compassionate to that less than 1% of the country.
Right wingers use all of this (and anti abortion too holier than thou nonsense - as if they care about "life") to promote their side as being better, which is all about fucking over the little guy, the workers, and enriching the 1%.
How does it feel to be a puppet of the plutocrats ?
there is a huge difference in those "icky" social issues that shapes culture.
This is mostly promotion of bullshit to get more social conservatives to go along with the right wing side.
I'm actually pretty darn conservative on social issues. I'm somewhat homophobic, as much as I try to override that with logic. I thought gay marriage was not necessary - that civil union was enough (without the word marriage - but the same thing - of course they're going to call themselves married so whatever). SJWs annoy the hell out of me. They go too far and are often mindless.
SJWs are something like 16% of democrats, at most. As for having a place (usually a single person use restroom) for trannys to use restroom, that was just being compassionate to that less than 1% of the country.
Right wingers use all of this (and anti abortion too holier than thou nonsense - as if they care about "life") to promote their side as being better, which is all about fucking over the little guy, the workers, and enriching the 1%.
How does it feel to be a puppet of the plutocrats ?
29
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 8:25am
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 8:25am
marcus says
Both the Democrats and Republicans are, which is why the largest voting demographic in the United States today is independent, at 45%.
When I was a kid, the nonsense was "real men wear pink" - if you're old enough you remember that. That phase lasted a few years until people realized "this is stupid", and so it will go with the tranny stuff. The poor kids that have transitioned in 10 years will be a monument and reminder to past mistakes in misplaced trust.
How does it feel to be a puppet of the plutocrats ?
Both the Democrats and Republicans are, which is why the largest voting demographic in the United States today is independent, at 45%.
When I was a kid, the nonsense was "real men wear pink" - if you're old enough you remember that. That phase lasted a few years until people realized "this is stupid", and so it will go with the tranny stuff. The poor kids that have transitioned in 10 years will be a monument and reminder to past mistakes in misplaced trust.
31
Onvacation
2019 Oct 24, 8:53am
Onvacation
2019 Oct 24, 8:53am
marcus says
Your number is high. Most SJW's are socialists or communists.
SJWs are something like 16% of democrats, at most
Your number is high. Most SJW's are socialists or communists.
32
socal2
2019 Oct 24, 9:11am
marcus says
But they control your party now. Everyone on the Democrat debate stage is cool with the most extremist Leftist positions from total open borders, trannys fucking up sports and bathrooms, 10,000 pronouns. Hillary Clinton is to the Right of all of them. Biden has to apologize for anodyne comments made less than 10 years ago....
I didn't vote for Trump in 2016 and still have alot of qualms about him - but will gladly vote for him to oppose the extremists who have taken over the Democrat party.
SJWs are something like 16% of democrats, at most.
But they control your party now. Everyone on the Democrat debate stage is cool with the most extremist Leftist positions from total open borders, trannys fucking up sports and bathrooms, 10,000 pronouns. Hillary Clinton is to the Right of all of them. Biden has to apologize for anodyne comments made less than 10 years ago....
I didn't vote for Trump in 2016 and still have alot of qualms about him - but will gladly vote for him to oppose the extremists who have taken over the Democrat party.
33
socal2
2019 Oct 24, 9:12am
richwicks says
FFS.
Are you a Sandy Hook truther too?
A false flag like 9/11 is a social issue. The Mandalay Bay false flag shooting is a social issue.
FFS.
Are you a Sandy Hook truther too?
34
Onvacation
2019 Oct 24, 9:49am
Onvacation
2019 Oct 24, 9:49am
socal2 says
Or maybe a flat earther that believes 2 airplanes can cause 3 buildings to implode?
richwicks saysA false flag like 9/11 is a social issue. The Mandalay Bay false flag shooting is a social issue.
FFS.
Are you a Sandy Hook truther too?
Or maybe a flat earther that believes 2 airplanes can cause 3 buildings to implode?
35
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 10:09am
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 10:09am
socal2 says
Don't know enough about Sandy Hook, but I can run the University at Fairbanks finite element simulation on my desktop. I'm not kidding, WTC7 strongly suggests controlled demolition. It's been researched for 18 years, the last study was a 4 year study with a finite element simulation model, and the one model that matches is near-simultaneous failure of all columns.
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Does this mean that's the ONLY thing that can explain it? No, not at all. Certainly something could have been missed, the model may be flawed - having said that here's the NIST model:
www.youtube.com/embed/jVE3YwRgU9k
They didn't even try.
You can think I'm a conspiracy nut, I don't care anymore. I'm just tired of the government lying, and the population being so gullible as to believe them still. Find that weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq yet? How about the Russian Collusion that they've been yammering about for 2 1/2 years? They LIE, a LOT. Have some courage and call them on their bullshit.
Go do this - get any set of guns you like, except pistol, and fire 700 rounds in 15 minutes - see if you're able to do that. Also, you know how Stephen Paddock SUPPOSEDLY made his money? He was supposed to be an expert at "video poker".
What a lot of people, don't realize, is that you can't beat a video poker machine unless it lets you. They are programmed to pay out just enough to get you to play again. You can't make a living at it. In a video poker game, not only does the machine know it's hand, it knows your hand, and the deck can be changed at will by it to ensure it will win and you will lose - and I guarantee it does.
Mandalay Bay was the most obvious false flag I could think of. There's absolutely no way Paddock made his money playing video poker, and even a marine in good shape would have difficulty firing 700 rounds in 15 minutes. That's nearly a shot per second. My shoulder would fall off. Seriously - you want to know? Try it. He was a middle aged, out of shape, white pasty guy.
richwicks saysA false flag like 9/11 is a social issue. The Mandalay Bay false flag shooting is a social issue.
FFS.
Are you a Sandy Hook truther too?
Don't know enough about Sandy Hook, but I can run the University at Fairbanks finite element simulation on my desktop. I'm not kidding, WTC7 strongly suggests controlled demolition. It's been researched for 18 years, the last study was a 4 year study with a finite element simulation model, and the one model that matches is near-simultaneous failure of all columns.
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Does this mean that's the ONLY thing that can explain it? No, not at all. Certainly something could have been missed, the model may be flawed - having said that here's the NIST model:
www.youtube.com/embed/jVE3YwRgU9k
They didn't even try.
You can think I'm a conspiracy nut, I don't care anymore. I'm just tired of the government lying, and the population being so gullible as to believe them still. Find that weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq yet? How about the Russian Collusion that they've been yammering about for 2 1/2 years? They LIE, a LOT. Have some courage and call them on their bullshit.
The Mandalay Bay false flag shooting is a social issue.
Go do this - get any set of guns you like, except pistol, and fire 700 rounds in 15 minutes - see if you're able to do that. Also, you know how Stephen Paddock SUPPOSEDLY made his money? He was supposed to be an expert at "video poker".
What a lot of people, don't realize, is that you can't beat a video poker machine unless it lets you. They are programmed to pay out just enough to get you to play again. You can't make a living at it. In a video poker game, not only does the machine know it's hand, it knows your hand, and the deck can be changed at will by it to ensure it will win and you will lose - and I guarantee it does.
Mandalay Bay was the most obvious false flag I could think of. There's absolutely no way Paddock made his money playing video poker, and even a marine in good shape would have difficulty firing 700 rounds in 15 minutes. That's nearly a shot per second. My shoulder would fall off. Seriously - you want to know? Try it. He was a middle aged, out of shape, white pasty guy.
36
Shaman
2019 Oct 24, 10:15am
Shaman
2019 Oct 24, 10:15am
socal2 says
This is going to be the stance of most Independents in 2020. Better the asshole we know than the lunatics the Left is offering.
didn't vote for Trump in 2016 and still have alot of qualms about him - but will gladly vote for him to oppose the extremists who have taken over the Democrat party.
This is going to be the stance of most Independents in 2020. Better the asshole we know than the lunatics the Left is offering.
37
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 10:26am
richwicks
2019 Oct 24, 10:26am
komputodo says
Oh come on, Clinton was the media's darling.
Look, today Caligula's horse could run against anybody in the "establishment" and have a very good chance of winning. With the exception of maybe a dozen people in ALL of congress, you could dump the rest of them in a woodchipper feet first and I'd be celebrating, and so would 90% of the United States.
As long as Trump is PERCEIVED to not be establishment, he's going to have an easy time winning I think, provided we have an accurate ballot system, and I'm not at all certain of that.
Obama isn't remembered fondly.
He's the medias darling still...If he could run again, He could beat TRUMP.
Oh come on, Clinton was the media's darling.
Look, today Caligula's horse could run against anybody in the "establishment" and have a very good chance of winning. With the exception of maybe a dozen people in ALL of congress, you could dump the rest of them in a woodchipper feet first and I'd be celebrating, and so would 90% of the United States.
As long as Trump is PERCEIVED to not be establishment, he's going to have an easy time winning I think, provided we have an accurate ballot system, and I'm not at all certain of that.
39
RWSGFY
2019 Nov 21, 6:51pm
RWSGFY
2019 Nov 21, 6:51pm
richwicks says
Were you living under a rock? Even NY-fucking-T reported about US Army personnel getting poisoned by chemical munitions found in a stash discovered in the Iraqi desert around 2007.
Find that weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq yet?
Were you living under a rock? Even NY-fucking-T reported about US Army personnel getting poisoned by chemical munitions found in a stash discovered in the Iraqi desert around 2007.
40
Rin
2019 Nov 21, 8:45pm
Rin
2019 Nov 21, 8:45pm
richwicks says
For me, the end of Rachael Madcow, I mean Maddow, was her anti-male remark, after Trump's inauguration ...
https://patrick.net/post/1301811/2017-01-23-election-bitches-read-my-lips-the-vote-of-women-in-boston-and-nyc-don-t-matter
In other words, what do heavy metal bands have anything to do with Trump getting inaugurated. Let me answer that question for you ... nothing!
Rachael Maddow is one
For me, the end of Rachael Madcow, I mean Maddow, was her anti-male remark, after Trump's inauguration ...
https://patrick.net/post/1301811/2017-01-23-election-bitches-read-my-lips-the-vote-of-women-in-boston-and-nyc-don-t-matter
Rachel Maddow, who's normally just a standard California/Northeast Ivy League liberal type, decided to associate hard rocking men, meaning the headbangers (hinting that they were over aged 16 year old teenagers), playing in some 'American Carnage' tour ...
www.youtube.com/embed/kVwuizpVrWk
as somewhat related to, or even analogous, to Trump's *American Carnage inauguration speech.
This whole enchilada is just a well disguised, male bashing national phenomena, disguised as some democratic movement.
Seriously, where were these bitches in 2000, when in fact, the voting recounts of Miami-Dade county were obstructed and there was clear indication of election fraud throughout Florida? Was it because the fight was between two guys, that the feminists didn't care?
Remember, Trump had won Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio. All three states did not have their ballets tampered wit...
In other words, what do heavy metal bands have anything to do with Trump getting inaugurated. Let me answer that question for you ... nothing!
41
mell
2019 Nov 21, 8:53pm
Gonna play some seasons in the abyss now. Slayer made some great records.
42
Rin
2019 Nov 21, 8:57pm
Rin
2019 Nov 21, 8:57pm
mell says
The point was that Rachel was associating headbanging with stupid men and Donald J Trump.
Gonna play some seasons in the abyss now. Slayer made some great records.
The point was that Rachel was associating headbanging with stupid men and Donald J Trump.
44
komputodo
2019 Nov 22, 5:25am
komputodo
2019 Nov 22, 5:25am
joshuatrio says
Gotta say... It's been rigged for hills or mike since the beginning.
Gotta say... It's been rigged for Biden since the beginning.
Gotta say... It's been rigged for hills or mike since the beginning.
45
rdm
2019 Nov 22, 8:31am
komputodo says
Got to love these threads where people (cult members are people too) that would run over their mothers in order to get in line to vote for Trump are so concerned about the currupt Dems are not running a fair primary. Tut tut. Please nominate oh please nominate Tulsi who cant even win a primary so we can bring all the dirt out about her past, pretty please.
joshuatrio saysGotta say... It's been rigged for Biden since the beginning.
Gotta say... It's been rigged for hills or mike since the beginning.
Got to love these threads where people (cult members are people too) that would run over their mothers in order to get in line to vote for Trump are so concerned about the currupt Dems are not running a fair primary. Tut tut. Please nominate oh please nominate Tulsi who cant even win a primary so we can bring all the dirt out about her past, pretty please.
46
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:36am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:36am
rdm says
TULSI! is embodyment of PUTIN or ASSAD or toadie of Lucifer...or something, while CLINTON IS MOTHER THERESA AND ST MARY IN ONE PERSON!
all the dirt out about her past
TULSI! is embodyment of PUTIN or ASSAD or toadie of Lucifer...or something, while CLINTON IS MOTHER THERESA AND ST MARY IN ONE PERSON!
47
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:38am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:38am
rdm says
Another one of those right-wing, toxic, straight white male trump toadies is Glenn Greenwald:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1197689154060115968/photo/1
My favorite paragraph from the NYT article depicting Tulsi as a fringe, divisive cult leader because she wears white pants suits - by the same author and paper who heaped praise on how Hillary's white pants suit shows she's ready to carry the nuclear codes.
May be, just may be, people here like Gabbard because she is against the current political machine.
Got to love these threads where people (cult members are people too) that would run over their mothers in order to get in line to vote for Trump are so concerned about the currupt Dems are not running a fair primary. Tut tut. Please nominate oh please nominate Tulsi who cant even win a primary so we can bring all the dirt out about her past, pretty please.
Another one of those right-wing, toxic, straight white male trump toadies is Glenn Greenwald:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1197689154060115968/photo/1
My favorite paragraph from the NYT article depicting Tulsi as a fringe, divisive cult leader because she wears white pants suits - by the same author and paper who heaped praise on how Hillary's white pants suit shows she's ready to carry the nuclear codes.
May be, just may be, people here like Gabbard because she is against the current political machine.
48
HeadSet
2019 Nov 22, 8:39am
HeadSet
2019 Nov 22, 8:39am
Please nominate oh please nominate Tulsi who cant even win a primary so we can bring all the dirt out about her past, pretty please.
Oh please. Nobody is interested in bringing up dirt on Tulsi. (As if there was not dirt on Biden, Warren, or Harris). Tulsi's appeal to the "Right" is her anti-war stance, and the slim chance Tulsi may bring a more sane border policy. Also, from the way a few of the pro Tulsi posts read, the motive appears to be the poster just wants to nail that babe.
Oh please. Nobody is interested in bringing up dirt on Tulsi. (As if there was not dirt on Biden, Warren, or Harris). Tulsi's appeal to the "Right" is her anti-war stance, and the slim chance Tulsi may bring a more sane border policy. Also, from the way a few of the pro Tulsi posts read, the motive appears to be the poster just wants to nail that babe.
49
rdm
2019 Nov 22, 8:39am
rd6B says
Is Clinton running for something? The question is who is your new Clinton?
CLINTON IS MOTHER THERESA AND ST MARY IN ONE PERSON!
Is Clinton running for something? The question is who is your new Clinton?
50
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:42am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:42am
rdm says
Our native American Chief Elizabeth Warren who is by now means engaging in any identity politics, as this screenshot below which I took from her twitter feed shows
Is Clinton running for something? The question is who is your new Clinton?
Our native American Chief Elizabeth Warren who is by now means engaging in any identity politics, as this screenshot below which I took from her twitter feed shows
51
rdm
2019 Nov 22, 8:43am
HeadSet says
Right cause she's at 0 to 4% in the polls, why bother. I understand the "nail that babe" in concept, though she not my type.
Oh please. Nobody is interested in bringing up dirt on Tulsi
Right cause she's at 0 to 4% in the polls, why bother. I understand the "nail that babe" in concept, though she not my type.
52
rdm
2019 Nov 22, 8:48am
rd6B says
He is simply a far left very unpleasant jerk who sometimes cosies up to the right when it is to both their advantage. In other words an opportunist.
trump toadies is Glenn Greenwald:
He is simply a far left very unpleasant jerk who sometimes cosies up to the right when it is to both their advantage. In other words an opportunist.
53
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:54am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 8:54am
rdm says
Yes, as I said anyone who is not a member of Democratic Party Machine and dares to criticize them is WORSE THAN LUCIFER and has to be slandered with fact-free slurs such as unpleasant jerk. Does not matter if the person and his team has won Pulitzer and other awards, or if he covered illegal United States and British global surveillance programs which other journalists did not touch, he is still WORSE! THAN! HITLER! while CLINTON UBER ALLES AM DER WELT and should never be criticized because ORANGEMAN BAD.
And no one should question illegal activities of intelligence apparatus, especially journalists. That makes them UNPLEASANT JERKS and TRAITORS as shown below.
Greenwald reported on the top-secret United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order requiring Verizon to provide the National Security Agency with telephone metadata for all calls between the U.S. and abroad, as well as all domestic calls
He is simply a far left very unpleasant jerk who sometimes cosies up to the right when it is to both their advantage. In other words an opportunist.
Yes, as I said anyone who is not a member of Democratic Party Machine and dares to criticize them is WORSE THAN LUCIFER and has to be slandered with fact-free slurs such as unpleasant jerk. Does not matter if the person and his team has won Pulitzer and other awards, or if he covered illegal United States and British global surveillance programs which other journalists did not touch, he is still WORSE! THAN! HITLER! while CLINTON UBER ALLES AM DER WELT and should never be criticized because ORANGEMAN BAD.
And no one should question illegal activities of intelligence apparatus, especially journalists. That makes them UNPLEASANT JERKS and TRAITORS as shown below.
Greenwald reported on the top-secret United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order requiring Verizon to provide the National Security Agency with telephone metadata for all calls between the U.S. and abroad, as well as all domestic calls
54
komputodo
2019 Nov 22, 8:59am
komputodo
2019 Nov 22, 8:59am
rdm says
For some reason, you guys still don't get it....we don't care who gets nominated.....I won't even vote....i never have.....this is just entertainment watching the dems acting like idiots
Got to love these threads where people (cult members are people too) that would run over their mothers in order to get in line to vote for Trump are so concerned about the currupt Dems are not running a fair primary. Tut tut. Please nominate oh please nominate Tulsi who cant even win a primary so we can bring all the dirt out about her past, pretty please.
For some reason, you guys still don't get it....we don't care who gets nominated.....I won't even vote....i never have.....this is just entertainment watching the dems acting like idiots
55
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 9:01am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 9:01am
komputodo says
I'd vote for Gabbard and I actually have given her campaign some $$$
But she will not be the chosen one
For some reason, you guys still don't get it....we don't care who gets nominated.....I won't even vote....i never have.....this is just entertainment watching the dems acting like idiots
I'd vote for Gabbard and I actually have given her campaign some $$$
But she will not be the chosen one
56
mell
2019 Nov 22, 9:21am
lol wtf is womxn - as we'd need even more butchering of the English language.
57
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 9:29am
Bd6r
2019 Nov 22, 9:29am
mell says
WOMXN shows that SHE IS NOT JUST A SMALL APPENDAGE to woMAN. Calling woman a woman is perpetuating trillions of years of oppression, while if you call a woman womxn, womyn, wammin, or something like that, it immediately destroys all toxic masculinity and shows Fucking White Males their place in the garbage heap of history, and impeaches ORANGEMANBAD!
lol wtf is womxn - as we'd need even more butchering of the English language.
WOMXN shows that SHE IS NOT JUST A SMALL APPENDAGE to woMAN. Calling woman a woman is perpetuating trillions of years of oppression, while if you call a woman womxn, womyn, wammin, or something like that, it immediately destroys all toxic masculinity and shows Fucking White Males their place in the garbage heap of history, and impeaches ORANGEMANBAD!
58
clambo
2019 Nov 22, 9:30am
Anyone who likes Warren must have very deep psychological problems; either extreme envy/hate for success and wealth or extreme low self worth.
Who is the world wants such flawed losers running his life? I sure don't.
Who is the world wants such flawed losers running his life? I sure don't.
59
Ceffer
2019 Nov 22, 10:13am
Ceffer
2019 Nov 22, 10:13am
Obama won't endorse anybody who has a legitimate birth certificate and a 'true female' wife (unless lesbian).
« First « Previous Comments 23 - 62 of 62 Search these comments
Warren has this in the bag, but look at what's happening.
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Former Vice President Joe Biden's lead in the race for the Democratic nomination for president has rebounded, and now stands at its widest margin since April, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.
Biden has the support of 34% of Democratic and Democratic-leaning registered voters, his best showing in CNN polling since just after his campaign's formal launch on April 25.
Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont are about even for second, with 19% and 16%, respectively.
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/23/politics/cnn-poll-biden-lead-increases/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drudgereport.com%2F