by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 17,226 - 17,265 of 37,916 Next » Last » Search these comments
Was that Dailymail article sponsored by Carhartt? They mention the suspect wearing that brand name FIVE times in that one article alone. Was it really that important? It's not like he was on the loose and they were giving people a better means of identifying him.
Is there a competition for the best Trumpian bon mot not actually uttered by Trump? I think Matt Gaetz would be a contender.
I guess that's what happens when you expect honor from money launderers.https://t.me/asbmil/3307
The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.
At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.
richwicks says
At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.
Ultracrepidarian to the rescue? Nice diversion, but you didn't comment on "pay for the noose". Because that's where ASB crapped their pants, and that's the part which I called out. They changed the meaning of Waltz's words to their opposite.
The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.
I can only raise a brow when I learn of an English speaker getting news from poor-ass bi-directional translation performed by a propaganda channel.
I consider you intentionally dishonest and deceptive at this point.
What was actually said was:
You little liar you. I'll explain.
No you won't.
richwicks says
No you won't.
I just did.
There was a reason why I pulled out a little snippet from that interview. My context was ASB making shit up, and for that context this little snippet was enough. It did the job, and it didn't change the meaning.
I don't care what ASB said.
I don't care what ASB said.
richwicks says
I don't care what ASB said.
You were responding to a post of which main point was what ASB said.
There is a reason why one of us (me) keeps posting that link to the source, the actual video: https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
I'm doing this exclusively to demonstrate your blatant and habitual dishonesty.
you have been learning from ultra-left.
What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.
richwicks says
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
That's a pattern with you when people insist upon you being held accountable for your bullshit.
mostly reader says
What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
You should've never contributed to a topic of which you have neither education not understanding.
HunterTits says
At least it is heterosexual.
How dare you presume gender!
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
You criticize me constantly, but you never correct me.
You are confused. "I don't correct you"
« First « Previous Comments 17,226 - 17,265 of 37,916 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,206,044 comments by 14,330 users - ForcedTQ, Tenpoundbass online now