patrick.net

How can Putin lie like that?

The International Noh Theater with avatars proceeds apace. The Russians must have a Putin Academy, where they train their actors to be fully educated, trained, skilled and well spoken, unlike the ritual humiliation fecal impaction garbage actors like Biden Actors the Swiss Octagon and Rockefellers impose on America.
https://t.me/greatreject/42777

Ceffer says

LOL! More thematic humiliation of the false flag hornswoggled.

high speed, large weight, it can yes.

If that King Charles is a legit video, he's won me over.

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

high speed, large weight, it can yes.

Trump was in NYC and he said at the time that the buildings would hot have reacted the way they did with a mere airplane collision since they were made for that. Planes were likely remote controlled drones beaming in on a detonator that let off the initial explosions in addition to the fuel on the planes.

What about the people on the original flights? Probably parked in hangars and gassed, the so-called phone calls from passengers contained no airplane noise, and it was demonstrated that cell phone calls to ground were not possible at the time anyway due to technology limitations. Airplanes had working phones, just not cell phones carried by passengers.

Tenpoundbass says

If that King Charles is a legit video, he's won me over.

The words largely match the mouth/speech movements. Who knows? Were the lips and mouth movements deep faked?

I think the audio is the giveaway - the voice is too close-miked, and there's no background noise from an obvious large room/chamber with many people present.

stereotomy says

Were the lips and mouth movements deep faked?

Yes, they were.

Accent is totally wrong as well, as part of the joke.

Ceffer says

'How does one man assert his power over another, Winston?'

Winston thought. 'By making him suffer,' he said.

'Exactly. By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation.

Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing. Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery is torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself.

Progress in our world will be progress towards more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy everything.

Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now.

There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed.

But always -- do not forget this, Winston -- always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- for ever.'

-- 1984 by George Orwell. Part 3, Chapter 3.

Kepi says

There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party.

Towards the Democratic Party alone.

stereotomy says

The words largely match the mouth/speech movements. Who knows? Were the lips and mouth movements deep faked?

I've seen a lot of videos like this. They simply dub over someone else's voice with words that would have a similar lip movement. Pretty funny results sometimes.

Ceffer says

and it was demonstrated that cell phone calls to ground were not possible at the time anyway due to technology limitations.

They didn't call from cell phones. They called from the airline's air phones.

Karloff says

They simply dub over someone else's voice with words that would have a similar lip movement.

I think it's possible now to dictate words and use AI to create the lip and mouth movements that go with them, at least for famous people where there's a lot of video to base it on.

Patrick says

I think it's possible now to dictate words and use AI to create the lip and mouth movements that go with them, at least for famous people where there's a lot of video to base it on.

Yep, it is.

Lol

Patrick says

Yes, they were.

Accent is totally wrong as well, as part of the joke.

It sounded like Ozzy

richwicks says

They didn't call from cell phones. They called from the airline's air phones.

I imagine there is all kinds of gaslighting and obfuscation around the issue, but along the flight paths there was little possibility of unbroken cell phone calls from air to ground with tech of the time. That and the lack of airplane noise led to the implication that the cell phones were likely used when the planes were parked on the ground i.e. at some point the planes with passengers were landed and hangared. Later generation cell phones with better cell phone tower coverage could, of course, better be used to make phone calls from planes.

One analyst addressed the issue of cell phones from in flight planes pretty extensively in one of the books, but, of course, it's one of the evidences that everybody chooses to ignore.

Implication is, of course that the passengers were landed, hangared and killed in some manner, while remote control drones and rockets were used for the rest of the 9/11 job. The authorities, of course, would forge any evidence they wanted around the issue, but the cell phone calls were documented and got out there before they could be covered up. The cell phone calls were a loose end.

Ceffer says

I imagine there is all kinds of gaslighting and obfuscation around the issue,

Exactly.

Part of propaganda is to lead you into dead ends. I know you, have met you, I have no problem with you, but you're going down a dead end.

I went down the physics route, that's fine, but I am no expert in structural engineering, a much easier path is going down the money trail people involved. You don't need to figure out what happened, that's a monumental task, you just need to know they lied. It's really enough to know that NIST wouldn't release their finite element simulation of WTC7's collapse - heck it was enough to see that what they produced was NOTHING like we saw in the collapse.

Remember, our media feeds us false information CONSTANTLY. We can't even be certain there were ANY phone calls. I have the freedom to be fairly confident that our media doesn't even bother to try to report the truth, I know this with certainty, and I can show you examples if you like, I've shown them many times. They just read teleprompters. They have no clue and they don't care about being accurate or truthful.

Ceffer says

Implication is, of course that the passengers were landed, hangared and killed in some manner, while remote control drones and rockets were used for the rest of the 9/11 job.

Why NOT kill all the people on the plane by ramming them into a building? Why make it more complicated than it needs to be?

There are TONS of research on all aspects of 9/11. One set of studies showed that the speeds of the 'planes' that hit the towers would have been nigh impossible for a even a skilled pilot, and shear forces would have torn the wings off of the alleged craft before they reached the buildings. They were featureless gray drones, not passenger airplanes.
https://youtu.be/-fMc50imEI8

Bad Tube video This video is by a guy who BUILT skyscrapers in New York. He says WTC were two of the most solid buildings in the world at the time.

Neocon psychopathic arrogance and madness hits a new tone deaf high note. Out-Klausing Klaus?:
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/55858

Ceffer says

What were the police, investigators, judges and the so called justice system doing?

Patrick says

Towards the Democratic Party alone.

Given that both parties have merged into one. McConnell, Graham etc. will get their slice of the pie but there will be one party.

Ceffer says

There are TONS of research on all aspects of 9/11. One set of studies showed that the speeds of the 'planes' that hit the towers would have been nigh impossible for a even a skilled pilot, and shear forces would have torn the wings off of the alleged craft before they reached the buildings. They were featureless gray drones, not passenger airplanes.

119 people multiplied by their average weight, the luggage for 119 people, and the weight of two wings full of Jet Fuel had to account for some Ass behind that hit.
The Boeing website states that this model, with a gas tank capacity of 63,500 gallons
Density. In performance calculations, airliner manufacturers use a density of jet fuel around 6.7 lb/USgal

Extra weight of people = 5 tons
Extra weight of their luggage = 2 to 3 tons
Jet fuel = 211 tons
People talk about the Jets like they were empty.
The plane empty without passengers or fuel weighs about as much as the fuel.

So that's over 430 tons. Or 860,000 lbs. Not a bug hitting the windshield scenario.

This talk that planes didn't fly into the buildings, goes against what I saw on the news live, and what friends of mine in New York at the time saw on the ground.

Ceffer says

There are TONS of research on all aspects of 9/11. One set of studies showed that the speeds of the 'planes' that hit the towers would have been nigh impossible for a even a skilled pilot, and shear forces would have torn the wings off of the alleged craft before they reached the buildings. They were featureless gray drones, not passenger airplanes.

WTF?

Ceffer says

There are TONS of research on all aspects of 9/11

That does bring up a good point. There has been tons of research suggesting that the world is flat, but it does not make it so.
Just because something is researched does not mean all facts have been established in their findings. Research tends to be biased by those financing the research only looking for the results they want to see.

Ceffer says

They were featureless gay drones

Gay drones? Now this is getting scary.

Tenpoundbass says

Ceffer says

There are TONS of research on all aspects of 9/11

That does bring up a good point. There has been tons of research suggesting that the world is flat, but it does not make it so.
Just because something is researched does not mean all facts have been established in their findings. Research tends to be biased by those financing the research only looking for the results they want to see.

The only thing which matters is whether YOU like the findings. If you do, STOP ASKING QUESTIONS AND JUST ROLL WITH IT!

gabbar says

Patrick says

Towards the Democratic Party alone.

Given that both parties have merged into one. McConnell, Graham etc. will get their slice of the pie but there will be one party.

I agree that the large majority of Republicans are also part of the Uniparty, but at least some of them seem to be outside it, mainly those endorsed by Trump.

On the other hand, 100% of Democrats are part of the Uniparty.

Trump/MAGA is really the alternative to the Uniparty.