« First « Previous Comments 4 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
@Minime there is this: https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Lol, https://www.conservapedia.com/Google is a good article.
It doesn't cover everything, but does seem to cover political issues very well. Looks like you have to join to edit anything.
Qurious who owns this site. Hope we can have publicly owned domain so nobody can buy it out.
If you check "whois conservapedia.com" from a terminal window, you see that the owner's name is hidden.
If Wikipedia no longer has a neutral policy, then Section 230 says they're a publisher and open to lawsuits.
I'm interested.
The difficulty is moderation. If you have no moderation, it will quickly fill with spam. But if you do have moderation, it has to be fair.
Where can we find a lot of fair moderators?
Technically, the Wikipedia should simply be a distributed git repo. Everyone would have a whole copy of it, and there would be a record of each edit. People would submit pull requests to get their changes in, and the moderators would be the ones accepting pull requests or not.
The total size of the text and images are probably not all that large. The total English text is only 16GB compressed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia
"Wikipedia Is Badly Biased"
@Minime there is this: https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Never donate to the Wikipedia.
Not that it will matter much. The Wikipedia is now a paid agent of the globalist/Democratic/media/CCP establishment. They have way too much cash now. They took the bribe and are sucking globalist cock with relish. They hate you if you dare to be neutral and their editors will enforce the suppression of your input.
You will not find objective facts on the Wikipedia anymore. It was a good experiement, but now it's done, corrupted by cash.