Comments 1 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
The Inquisition in peninsular Spain was generally not particularly interested and was highly skeptical of accusations of witchcraft. In Spanish America Inquisitors were similarly concerned with delegitimizing women who were accused and confessed to these crimes by proving that the supposed magic was in fact a female delusion. While this was a somewhat successful endeavor on the elite level, the prosecution of these women in fact created the environment for lower and middle class women to claim outlandish abilities and thus brought them a degree of power within their local communities.[16]
...
For women, across class and race, the aim of this magic was frequently to change the balance of power within the marital sphere or create a situation where one might find a husband. Sometimes this was a simple kind of magic meant to make a husband stay "true" to his wife, other times it included aims of impotency or obedience. Some women would use their menstrual blood or the water already used to clean their genitals in "encorselled" food; not only does this play on powerful gender roles of a woman's place in the private sphere, it also represents a metaphorical penetration of the male by the female as a way to hold power over the husband.[19]
@Minime there is this: https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Lol, https://www.conservapedia.com/Google is a good article.
It doesn't cover everything, but does seem to cover political issues very well. Looks like you have to join to edit anything.
Qurious who owns this site. Hope we can have publicly owned domain so nobody can buy it out.
If you check "whois conservapedia.com" from a terminal window, you see that the owner's name is hidden.
If Wikipedia no longer has a neutral policy, then Section 230 says they're a publisher and open to lawsuits.
I'm interested.
The difficulty is moderation. If you have no moderation, it will quickly fill with spam. But if you do have moderation, it has to be fair.
Where can we find a lot of fair moderators?
Technically, the Wikipedia should simply be a distributed git repo. Everyone would have a whole copy of it, and there would be a record of each edit. People would submit pull requests to get their changes in, and the moderators would be the ones accepting pull requests or not.
The total size of the text and images are probably not all that large. The total English text is only 16GB compressed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia
"Wikipedia Is Badly Biased"
@Minime there is this: https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page
Never donate to the Wikipedia.
Not that it will matter much. The Wikipedia is now a paid agent of the globalist/Democratic/media/CCP establishment. They have way too much cash now. They took the bribe and are sucking globalist cock with relish. They hate you if you dare to be neutral and their editors will enforce the suppression of your input.
You will not find objective facts on the Wikipedia anymore. It was a good experiement, but now it's done, corrupted by cash.