« First « Previous Comments 5 - 44 of 45 Next » Last » Search these comments





I'm waiting for the false flag analysis from some of the pundits because it's hard to call yet.
It is not looking good as a publicity stunt for the Dems or the rabid Mockingbird MSM. Their boomerang may again hit them in their own teeth.





17, of course, is Q.
The Afghan national suspected of shooting two National Guard members near the White House on Wednesday had worked with the CIA, the agency’s director said...
CIA director John Ratcliffe told Fox News Digital: "The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including CIA."
He added that Lakanwal "and so many others—should have never been allowed to come here."
https://www.newsweek.com/national-guard-shooting-suspect-rahmanullah-lakanwal-worked-with-cia-director-says-11118420
The Afghan national suspected of shooting two National Guard members near the White House on Wednesday had worked with the CIA, the agency’s director said...
CIA director John Ratcliffe told Fox News Digital: "The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including CIA."
He added that Lakanwal "and so many others—should have never been allowed to come here."
What are they trying to distract us from?

When I was a young man, my mother bought into numerology. It was dumb, she eventually realized. Constantly looking for some number in a coincidence or every event.



Contrary to the media narrative, Lakanwal’s motives are not difficult to understand, especially given his training as a terroristic counter-terrorist. The Zero Units were trained in the use of violence to punish civilians suspected of collaborating with Taliban forces, to send a fearful message to the wider community to make them afraid. Don’t help the Taliban, or else.
In this case, the simplest working hypothesis —Occam’s razor— is that Lakanwal used his skills to plan and execute a terror operation. The next logical question is: who was his op intended to terrify? His most likely target was soldiers and U.S. security services; the attack was meant to destabilize the Trump crime crackdown, while minimizing civilian casualties and therefore civilian outrage.
I’m not the only one who’s noticed. In an article published this morning, Unherd observed that, because of the ambush, “newly on-edge guardsmen might overreact in their interactions with the public and use unnecessary force.”
Unherd explicitly noted that National Guardsmen will now be more fearful, which is perfectly understandable. “Guardsmen are only human … they will now be more wary of the public.” It ominously but correctly observed, “The possibility of miscalculation has grown significantly since Wednesday, through no fault of the National Guard.” ...
The biggest unasked question on everyone’s mind is: was Lakanwal acting alone?
It was certainly curious timing. Within the same week as the ambush, six U.S. congressmen launched a high-profile video encouraging troops to defy “illegal orders.” In the days leading up to the release of that “illegal orders” video, several of the congressmen were making the rounds complaining about National Guard deployments. So it isn’t hard to figure out which illegal orders they were referring to.
Also during the same week, billboards began popping up near National Guard bases, prompting soldiers to ask whether ‘crime crackdown duty’ and immigration enforcement duty was worth it, and mocking them...
(On an aside, this seems like a good time to mention that, during the first years of the pandemic, the national billboard service companies refused to sell billboard space for messages questioning masks, vaccines, or pandemic policy. But never mind.)
The URL plastered on the new billboards leads to a website that, among other things, immediately encourages soldiers to evade surveillance...
Anyway, the website offered to provide soldiers considering disobeying orders with free lawyers...
(In another section labeled “Outside the U.S.,” the website offered “attacks on vessels in international or foreign waters” as another potentially illegal order for our sailors to think about. Thomas Jefferson, who famously fought the Barbary Pirates, might like to offer a word here.)
Altogether, it’s quite a lot for our patriotic soldiers to take in. So far this week, we have seen three extraordinary but seemingly unconnected events:
Sitting senators and representatives strongly imply that Trump’s orders are illegal and should be refused.
A national billboard-and-website strategy promising to protect soldiers who refuse orders, by giving them free lawyers, and specifically identifying Trump’s immigration policies as potentially illegal.
The brazen, daylight assassination of at least one, and possibly two, soldiers who were following the kind of orders that the website dislikes, by a CIA-trained jihadist.
I am not saying these seemingly unrelated events are connected. But folks have noticed their uncanny temporal synchronicity. As Auric Goldfinger said in the eponymous 007 novel, “Mr. Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and the third time it’s enemy action.”
« First « Previous Comments 5 - 44 of 45 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1993768192880325079?s=20