4
0

"Revelation of the method" : They are publicly telling us what they intend to do


               
2025 Aug 13, 8:31am   450 views  26 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

https://x.com/_aussie17/status/1710794107004879174


John Cusack accidentally (or intentionally) spilled the beans on TV Series Utopia(2020):

We intend to stop human reproduction for three generations. The busy, endless global assembly line of babies will grind to a halt. You're sterilizing people? Uh-huh. In the first five years, we'll start to see major birth rate declines as teenagers vaccinated today hit their childbearing years.

(I think it will be more than three generations, DNA lasts forever...)




We already have a demographic crisis, with populations crashing in most places.

Criminals like Gates are just making it worse.

Comments 1 - 26 of 26        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 8:32am  

https://x.com/c_plushie/status/1706184486483095938#m


The term, 'Revelation of the method' was coined by the late James Shelby Downard, to explain the alchemical processing of a society by its controllers.

Revelation of the method is when they tell us through books, publications, movies and news releases what they're doing. In their minds, if we don't recognise this, that's not their problem, it's ours.

Revelation of the method is also a form of mockery.



2   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 8:39am  

I don't really believe in the woo-woo karmic stuff, but I do believe that many members of the elite are psychopaths who delight in telling us how they are going to sterilize and kill us, knowing that the vast majority of people will demand their own extinction if the TV tells them to want that. You just have to make them a little afraid of a virus or something, and they will jump off the cliff, and drag others with them.

Bill Gates is a great example. And Fauci. And Epstein.
3   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 8:46am  

https://x.com/NewBuildGuruu/status/1836141892485964234


This movie just came out showing peoples phones exploding, then the pager attack. Wild?! Has Hollywood predicted this before?



4   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 8:49am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/disease-xyzab-friday-january-19-2024


In 2008’s “X-Files: I Want to Believe,” the government first released a deadly virus, call it Disease X, hyped the public’s fear, and then released a nanotech-based genetic vaccine in service of their nefarious plot, and to catch a few Benjamins in the process. I know, I know, that plot is too crazy to even make a movie about, what were they thinking, and so forth. ...
5   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 8:50am  

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/did-fauci-steal-social-distancing


Did Fauci Steal Social Distancing from Hollywood?

If you REALLY want to go down the rabbit hole, I am about to blow your mind.

Flashback to 2011 movie, “Contagion”.

The blockbuster movie with star-studded Hollywood cast, about a global pandemic stemming from a virus from a wet market in China…

Nathan Wolfe, Metabiota founder and lead virologist, was the lead biological consultant for this movie to help direct the producers on how the health community would realistically respond to a “hypothetical” pandemic.

Nathan Wolfe is also monetarily affiliated with Ghislaine Maxwell and the Clinton Foundation via the TerraMar project, and the Bidens via Rosemont Seneca funding his Biolab company with multiple labs in Ukraine, Metabiota.

Is it’s a coincidence that the same people who warned about a global pandemic coming, also happen to be the ones modifying pathogens?

The same guy who was looking for bat coronaviruses in Ukraine, is also closely affiliated with Epstein, Clinton, Biden, and the Rothschilds.

He also “predicted” the Covid pandemic in his book in 2008, exactly where it would come from, and how the government would respond to it, over a decade before it happened…

Fauci did not “make up” social distancing. It was always the plan.

Nathan Wolfe is the at the epicenter of this entire thing. Fauci is just a front man.
6   HANrongli   2025 Aug 13, 9:02am  

翻译成中文:
Patrick的新主题“方法的启示”:他们正在公开告诉我们他们打算做什么:

Https://x.com/_aussie17/status/1710794107004879174

约翰·库萨克意外(或故意)泄露了电视剧《乌托邦》(2020):

我们打算阻止人类繁殖三代人。 繁忙、无尽的全球婴儿装配线将停滞不前。 你在给人们消毒吗? 嗯。 在前五年,随着今天接种疫苗的青少年进入育龄期,我们将开始看到出生率大幅下降。

(我认为会超过三代,DNA会永远持续下去......)

Journalist Summary:
International communism and its puppets have taken their harm against humanity to a deeper, more persistent, and widespread level.
Conscientious and vigilant scientists in biology and medicine are being smeared as conspiracy theorists, while journalists who expose darkness and evil are labeled as “spreading panic.”
It is time to wake up!
— France: Journalist for Freedom, Health, and Human Rights: Han Rongli

记者综述:国际共产主义及其傀儡、对人类的侵害进入深层次、持久性、普遍性…,具有忧患意识的科学生物医学家,被污蔑成阴谋论者,良知记者揭露黑暗与罪恶,被视为“制造恐慌”,是时候觉醒了!/ 法国:自由健康人权记者:韩荣利
7   rocketjoe79   2025 Aug 13, 9:46am  

It's not a "Conspiracy Theory" if there really is a conspiracy....
8   HANrongli   2025 Aug 13, 10:16am  

The journalist observes that canes 🩼 and wheelchairs ♿️ have become a “rare side effect” now commonly seen in public spaces—affecting people of all ages.
This sight fills the journalist with sorrow and concern, feeling deep empathy for those affected.
记者看到公共场所拐杖🩼轮椅♿️如此“罕见的副作用”、且无年龄界限,记者伤心忧虑、感同身受!
9   Patrick   2025 Aug 13, 2:24pm  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/disease-xyzab-friday-january-19-2024


In 2008’s “X-Files: I Want to Believe,” the government first released a deadly virus, call it Disease X, hyped the public’s fear, and then released a nanotech-based genetic vaccine in service of their nefarious plot, and to catch a few Benjamins in the process. I know, I know, that plot is too crazy to even make a movie about, what were they thinking, and so forth.
10   SharkyP   2025 Aug 14, 8:17am  

I am all for population reduction, back to the time when the streams and oceans weren’t polluted, where global freezing was an issue. The more people on earth the more stressed everyone becomes. Sure capitalism would take a hit. Too bad.
11   Patrick   2025 Aug 14, 8:21am  

I agree with Elon on this one. Most of earth is pretty much unpopulated, and the real danger now is population collapse.
12   HeadSet   2025 Aug 14, 6:27pm  

SharkyP says

I am all for population reduction, back to the time when the streams and oceans weren’t polluted, where global freezing was an issue. The more people on earth the more stressed everyone becomes. Sure capitalism would take a hit. Too bad.

Capitalism would not take a hit. The elites holding a high number of resources would. Commerce would work just fine if vacancies brought home prices to commonly affordable levels.
13   HeadSet   2025 Aug 14, 6:33pm  

Patrick says

I agree with Elon on this one. Most of earth is pretty much unpopulated, and the real danger now is population collapse.

I totally disagree here. It is not just about "elbow room" when it come to population. Unless you want everyone living hand to mouth, you must consider the resources needed to maintain a 1st World lifestyle. There is no where near enough resources to support giving even the current world population a first world lifestyle.
14   PeopleUnited   2025 Aug 14, 7:45pm  

Bullshit.

There is literally limitless energy, and we can already feed the world. It is NOT an issue of limited resources. It is an issue of limited distribution. We can provide clean water, and ample food, energy and housing for probably 3-4 times as many humans alive right now. In order to do so we would need to stop fighting wars, and claw back the fortunes of the unseen trillionaires who run the world, putting their money to work we could literally build utopia.

It won’t happen because the satanic trillionaires serve Satan, not humanity. They are building a dystopian new world order. Only Jesus will be able to defeat them and build his 1000 year utopia reign. It could come sooner than you think.
15   Patrick   2025 Aug 14, 8:10pm  

HeadSet says

There is no where near enough resources to support giving even the current world population a first world lifestyle.


Like PeopleUnited points out, there is a huge problem with concentration of wealth.

But also, better efficiency through technology can vastly expand what we can do with the resources we have.

And check out the population distribution on earth. It's almost all in rather small areas.

Lastly, just look up. Space is pretty much infinite, so the resources out there are infinite.
16   Patrick   2025 Aug 14, 8:20pm  

Anyway, humanity has been committing slow suicide with feminism for quite a while now. The pill changed everything.

Homosexuality and trannyism cuts down on reproduction even more.

It may already be too late to reverse the decline.
17   HeadSet   2025 Aug 14, 8:39pm  

Patrick says

there is a huge problem with concentration of wealth.

Distribute the world's wealth evenly among the total population and you will have a world full of nothing but poor.

Think about how much water, electricity, food, and fuel a typical American uses. Multiply that by 9 billion.

Patrick says

Space is pretty much infinite, so the resources out there are infinite.

That is about as useful as planning a spending spree based on the money I know is in the Titanic's safe. Get the SCUBA gear!
18   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 Aug 14, 9:53pm  

Patrick says


Anyway, humanity has been committing slow suicide with feminism for quite a while now. The pill changed everything.

Rollo covers some of this stuff.

The main culprits emerged at the same time:
1. Widespread Education for Women
2. The Pill
3. No Fault

He made the case that of the three, #1 and #2 were be big ones and #1 may be worse than #2 once you start comparing to developing countries and when their birth rates began to drop.

It may be best not to educate women except for anti-selfishness (now totally abandoned), gracefulness (ditto), basic religious (rare), math, and literacy. We want them just smart enough to try to save on groceries and read psalms. To feel guilt and derive their validation from caring from others, not "Living their best live" and "exploring themselves". Women are far more solipsistic and neurotic than men to begin with.

One unmentioned one is Hofare, which didn't come about until the 60s also (some states did start Hoefare in the 50s, but compared to today it was crackers and powdered milk). But falling birthrates are a universal phenom including in countries where hoefare is far less generous.

Another big one is the later the marriage and the later the age of first child birth, the fewer children overall.

Hoefare specifically describing handouts to unmarried non-widowed females with children.
20   Ceffer   2025 Aug 15, 3:00pm  

The problem is the aliens aren't eating enough people and casting spells strong enough to fog the minds of the rest about the missing.

They aren't living up to their responsibilities, and the lazy alien sods operate through their bloodline psychopath proxies to do the heavy lifting for them.

Sloppy. Very very sloppy.
21   RWSGFY   2025 Aug 15, 4:49pm  

On concentration of wealth I like this little anecdote (most probably apocryphal):

Circa 1918 a young Socialist barged into Rockefeller's office and confronted him about unfair wealth distribution and how people weren't getting their fair share. Rockefeller asked whether the guy wanted to get his fair share right then and there. Then he called his secretary and asked him to give the young fella 67 cents. ($1.2B of Rockefeller's net worth divided by 1.8B Earth population at the time).
22   Patrick   2025 Aug 15, 5:03pm  

I don't have a problem with people who get rich by creating legitimate businesses in fair and open competition.

Rockefeller was famously a monopolist though, using his power in the industry to prevent competition, which raised prices a lot for everyone.

I seem to remember that he would use his money to buy up rail lines so that competitors could not get their products to market.
23   HeadSet   2025 Aug 15, 7:51pm  

Patrick says

Rockefeller was famously a monopolist though, using his power in the industry to prevent competition, which raised prices a lot for everyone.

Actually, prices went down for his oil. Rockefeller used his "uniform grade" quality to build a market and then with his scale he could undersell any competition. He invented the pipeline method to transfer oil when railroad owners raised shipping prices.
24   Patrick   2025 Aug 15, 8:05pm  

@HeadSet

Huh, ChatGPT agrees with you:


Did Rockefeller's monopolistic practices raise or lower the price of oil for the public?

ChatGPT said:

John D. Rockefeller's monopolistic practices through Standard Oil actually lowered the price of oil for the public, at least in the short to medium term, despite the company's aggressive tactics to eliminate competition.

🔍 Breakdown:
✅ Yes – Prices Went Down

Standard Oil was highly efficient. It invested in:

Better refining technology
Economies of scale
Vertical integration (owning the supply chain: drilling, refining, transporting, marketing)

These efficiencies allowed Rockefeller to cut costs significantly.

As a result, the price of kerosene (the main oil product at the time) dropped sharply during Standard Oil's rise:

From ~30 cents per gallon in the 1860s to less than 10 cents by the 1890s.

📉 Data Point:

Between 1870 and 1897, the price of refined oil dropped by over 80% while quality improved — under Standard Oil’s near-total control of the market.

🧩 But There's a Catch:
❗ Anti-competitive behavior

Rockefeller used predatory pricing, railroad rebates, hostile takeovers, and intimidation to wipe out or absorb competitors.

These practices made it nearly impossible for smaller companies to compete, which is what led to antitrust action later on.
26   Ceffer   2025 Aug 25, 12:48pm  

Patrick says


https://x.com/RjNol/status/1959647232959094937




It's combination of 'remote viewing' which is a super cognitive receiver of the herd mind and channeling of the 'other minds', and actual leaks of 'their plans' aka Globalists, Illuminati types, Freemasons, and mother WEFers, whose shadow masters allegedly plan hundreds of years in advance at critical astronomical alignments and dates, at behest of whoever is running them to betray the herds.

The Covid 19 fraud (title used way before the event and designates the scheme rather than any particular disease) was planned as an exploitation of population hysteria over disease contagion (most people still have a primitive superstition about what disease is). The disease hysteria could be used to funnel people into committing suicide under banner of official authority and giving up all their human rights while committing that suicide. It seems that the current Covid roll of the dice used up every source of government, professional, scientific and agency credibility on that one roll. Of course, that is because the Satanic imperative is to accomplish everything through lies so that the population can never synchronize on truth.

The imaginations of 'sensitives' can pick up these things and broadcast them in their 'fictions'. The psychopaths believe that their spearhead announcements protect them from karma, which they believe in religiously. However, the science fiction empaths can unravel the whole schemes, which are regarded as fictions rather than recipes.

Philip Dick is another case in point, because his worlds are becoming our world.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste