2
0

COVID Vaccinated Children are 4423% more likely to Die!!!


 invite response                
2022 Sep 8, 10:27am   725 views  9 comments

by Shaman   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

So the UK has a new prime minister and quite suddenly their ONS has released new data about jabs and child mortality. One news site has compiled that data into charts and what they reveal is absolutely SHOCKING!
Triple vaxxed kids have over 4000% more risk of dying last year than unvaxxed kids.
https://expose-news.com/2022/07/27/uk-gov-vaccinated-children-increased-mortality/

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   Booger   2022 Sep 8, 10:37am  

"COVID Vaccinated Children are 4423% more likely to Die!!!"

That means that it's working.
2   Ceffer   2022 Sep 8, 10:47am  

Sad. Target was 100,000 percent. They just don't make democidal villains like they used to.
3   richwicks   2022 Sep 8, 1:19pm  

Shaman says

So the UK has a new prime minister and quite suddenly their ONS has released new data about jabs and child mortality. One news site has compiled that data into charts and what they reveal is absolutely SHOCKING!
Triple vaxxed kids have over 4000% more risk of dying last year than unvaxxed kids.
https://expose-news.com/2022/07/27/uk-gov-vaccinated-children-increased-mortality/




Wait a minute...

The deaths from the last 4 subsets are (from right to left):

289.02+247.73+41.29 + 138.31+138.31 + 97.28+97.28 + 9.56+9.56 = 1068.34

If that's out of 100,000 deaths, that's 1.07 % of the children's population - at least who got vaxxed. That's too large of a number. Nearly every kid in a school would know somebody that died. This has to be erroneous.
4   Shaman   2022 Sep 8, 2:24pm  

@richwicks
The math here seems tricky to me. They’re trying to tease out mortality rates from ONS data provided in person years. Read the article and see if you can figure out their method. It’s not making a ton of sense to me.
5   richwicks   2022 Sep 8, 2:27pm  

Shaman says

@richwicks
The math here seems tricky to me. They’re trying to tease out mortality rates from ONS data provided in person years. Read the article and see if you can figure out their method. It’s not making a ton of sense to me.


Nah, me too lazy.

Overall mortality rate is all that matters to me, and Onvacation periodically goes through that.

I'm not obsessed about knowing precisely what is going on. It's enough for me to know the vaccines are dangerous and worthless for protecting against disease. There will be a hell of a fallout in time, but it will take time.
6   Shaman   2022 Sep 8, 2:35pm  

True enough. I think the problem was that ONS obscured its data inside numbers that people don’t know what to do with. This site reverse engineered their math to get the numbers to make up the charts. It’s not per 100,000. That would’ve been too simple and obvious.
7   richwicks   2022 Sep 8, 2:58pm  

Shaman says

True enough. I think the problem was that ONS obscured its data inside numbers that people don’t know what to do with. This site reverse engineered their math to get the numbers to make up the charts. It’s not per 100,000. That would’ve been too simple and obvious.


Yeah, they are making the data hard to get death RATES of each group. That's all anybody cares about. The fact they are trying to so hard to technically make the information available, but obscure it so you cannot be certain of what you're looking at, tells you all you need to know. The data they are starting out with is that

1) X people were vaccinated to different levels
2) Y people died each level of vaccination weren't alive Z months later

Now if they just published THAT data, that's all we'd need, and that's what THEY started with yet we only get it through math and obscurity, so we can't really know. Death rates would be trivial to calculate with that and that's the data we all want to know, but they have to fuck with it - they go through WORK to obscure the raw data, instead of doing no work and just giving the raw data.

It doesn't matter. If, say 66.6% of the population was vaccinated, and 10% of those people die within the next 3 years, we'll see it in the excess death rates.
8   EBGuy   2022 Sep 8, 3:53pm  

This is what the UKHSA is now recommending in their Green Book.
See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1102459/Greenbook-chapter-14a-4September22.pdf
Chapter 14a - 33
The following groups should be offered a COVID-19 booster vaccine in the autumn of 2022:
●residents in a care home for older adults and staff working in care homes for older adults
●frontline health and social care workers
●all adults aged 50 years and over
●persons aged 5 to 49 years in a clinical risk group, as set out in Tables 3 and 4
●persons aged 5 to 49 years who are household contacts of people with immunosuppression (as defined in Tables 3 and 4)
●persons aged 16 to 49 years who are carers (as defined in Table 3).


Notice that they are not recommending giving to kids unless they are in an at risk group.
9   richwicks   2022 Sep 8, 5:03pm  

EBGuy says

Notice that they are not recommending giving to kids unless they are in an at risk group.


Same thing Hitler was doing, he encouraged euthanasia of "babies unfit to live", nurses even got awards for it, when they killed over 1,000.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions