Comments 1 - 22 of 22 Search these comments
Does this mean my precious crap shack will drop in paper value? Horrors
I wish you no ill will, but I hope that mine in SJ will.
The high prices have made life miserable here for many folks.
Historical norm before the 2000's bubble.
B.A.C.A.H. saysI wish you no ill will, but I hope that mine in SJ will.
The high prices have made life miserable here for many folks.
I wouldn't mind a bit if the value of RE cratered so hard, that my house was only worth $69K. I didn't buy it for wealth, I bought it to live in. So the house is priceless if I have no interest to sell it. Worth $500K or 2 cents makes no difference to me. But I if the value of my house was inline with the Historical norm before the 2000's bubble. It would only be worth about $120 to $150K on the very high end. And most folks think they live in a Jumbo Loan domicile, their house shouldn't be worth a penny over $250K.
I would like to buy more real estate one day, land in some country acreage somewhere. And keep this house in the family. I would also like to rest easy that the tax situation isn't going to chase out of control manipulated inflation out ...
always figure the real house price is 1999 price plus inflation.
RC2006 saysalways figure the real house price is 1999 price plus inflation.
So the real price is a 2019 price?
always figure the real house price is 1999 price plus inflation.
So the real price is a 2019 price?
I wouldn't mind a bit if the value of RE cratered so hard, that my house was only worth $69K.
It will be interesting to see what happens to California real estate prices if interest rates go up significantly and the exodus from CA continues.
We will own nothing anyhow.
If you want to adjust for inflation, you have to go back to the start of our current fiat currency, since all fiat currencies are created for the sole purpose of inflation/dishonest economics. Conservatively that would decrease the value of today's homes by 28. So a $500,000 home is really worth about $178k.
There are several ways to reconcile the market movement underlying the rate spike. The Fed is the easiest target as last week's "minutes" suggested a faster timeline for balance sheet normalization.
Those are fancy words that mean the Fed will be decreasing its rate-friendly bond purchases sooner/faster than previously expected.
Other explanations include the notion that omicron could substantially hasten the endemic phase of covid. Finally, bond market supply has been elevated over the past 2 weeks, and higher supply means higher rates, all other things being equal.
With any move as abrupt as this, there's always a chance that technical factors will help push back in the other direction. Simply put, traders will eventually have sold enough bonds that the new, lower prices (and higher yields) are attractive enough to bring buyers back into the market. There's no telling exactly when that will happen or how much of a recovery it could induce--only that it becomes more likely the higher rates go.
On a housekeeping note, if you missed last week's commentary on the 3.22% figure in Freddie Mac's rate survey being WAY too low to reflect the end-of-week reality, it's worth getting caught up (and then realizing that rates have only continued to move higher since then). Or just take a look at the chart!
https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/markets/mortgage-rates-01102022?source=patrick.net