5
1

Early Study of Pfizer Covid Shot Shows 99% Graphene Oxide


 invite response                
2021 Jul 7, 11:19am   9,917 views  80 comments

by NuttBoxer   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

The article is in Spanish:
https://everydayconcerned.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MICROSCOPIA_DE_VIAL_CORMINATY_DR_CAMPRA_FIRMA_E_1_HORIZONTAL.pdf

The FDA knows graphene oxide is toxic, and will not approve it for human consumption:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphite_oxide

Comments 1 - 40 of 80       Last »     Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2021 Jul 9, 4:21pm  

The good thing about all that graphene is you can now sign your name with your bare finger.
2   NuttBoxer   2021 Jul 9, 5:00pm  

HunterTits says
FDA will approve whatever the Deep State says to fucking approve.


But they haven't. All covid shots are still in the experimentation phase, none are FDA approved.
3   TonyKulernus   2021 Jul 9, 10:04pm  

I saw this on 4chan a few days ago. Has some links to some white papers.

vax is graphene
symptoms of graphene poisoning are the same as vax side effects
graphene can bypass the barrier and will end up in your brain
graphene interferes with electromagnetic waves
antennas that produce electromagnetic waves are everywhere
it is possible to alter brain functions with electricity
Vaxxd to become a part of the upcoming Internet of Things monitored and controlled via graphene in their brains.
>Spanish scientists determine there is graphene in the vaccine
https://www.europereloaded.com/analysis-of-vaccination-vial-confirms-presence-of-graphene-nanoparticles/
>covid spike proteins degrade the brain barrier allowing graphene through
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786155/
>graphene alters fear response in mice
https://graphene-flagship.eu/graphene/news/soothing-the-symptoms-of-anxiety-with-graphene-oxide/
>graphene has potential for mind control
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190124105309.htm
a paper about toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles https://archive.is/WQF3L
the symptoms of graphene poisoning are the same as injection side (or maybe main) effects.
So far the effects of graphene poisoning include:
- acute inflammation response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of important organs;
- serious damage to the gastrointestinal tract;
- A high dose of GO (graphene oxide) that forms aggregations can block pulmonary blood vessels and result in dyspnea, and platelet thrombi;
- GO reportedly disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the lungs and stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines;
- In the chicken embryo model, pristine graphene flakes decreased the ribonucleic acid level and the rate of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis, leading to harmful effects on brain tissue development and the atypical ultrastructure was observed in the brain;
4   Onvacation   2021 Jul 10, 1:23pm  

HunterTits says
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

Seeing that the death rate of the Wuhan is under 400 a week and there are treatments maybe the emergency is over?

WT actual F?
5   NuttBoxer   2021 Jul 11, 6:31pm  

HunterTits says
Yes they are. Just not fully approved.


"An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Taking into consideration input from the FDA, manufacturers decide whether and when to submit an EUA request to FDA."

Last time I checked, unapproved, means NOT approved, it's doesn't mean partially approved. Just because someone can conduct a study for a new drug, doesn't mean the FDA has "partially" approved it.
6   NuttBoxer   2021 Jul 11, 6:33pm  

TonyKulernus says
I saw this on 4chan a few days ago. Has some links to some white papers.


The first link in the OP is the official study conducted by the lab in Spain. They have a hundred more vials, and plan to confirm and expand on their initial findings.
7   rocketjoe79   2021 Jul 11, 10:24pm  

This is complete bullshit.
8   Onvacation   2021 Jul 11, 10:30pm  

rocketjoe79 says
This is complete bullshit.

The story? Or the experimental biologic agent?
9   Patrick   2021 Oct 6, 2:17pm  

Another worst-case scenario:

Maybe the graphene or whatever makes the shot magnetic can cause blood clots on if the person is later subject to intense radio waves.

So various people could be caused to drop dead whenever the Pfizer/government complex wants to get rid of them.

Just sayin it may be possible.
10   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 6, 4:27pm  

I think it's more likely an early trial of bio-digital convergence. The ability of the shot to penetrate the blood brain barrier, coupled with 5g's ability to penetrate same, coupled with the research that has already gone into nano-particles, and the sociopaths desire to constantly test everything, I'd wager people with the shot are transmitting, and maybe even receiving data right now.
11   Bd6r   2021 Oct 6, 4:39pm  

NuttBoxer says
research that has already gone into nano-particles

nano-garbage is used only to extract money from granting agencies, almost no practical applications as of now.
12   AmericanKulak   2021 Oct 6, 5:12pm  

Bd6r says

nano-garbage is used only to extract money from granting agencies, almost no practical applications as of now.


I remember some of the biggest bullshit I ever saw, Allentown, PA papers, county, city was bragging about it would have the first nano-engineering certificate or something, and would attract all these nano-manufacturing plants to replace the steel mills, back around 2009. Millions and millions from the stimulus package.

I doubt there's a single plant making nano-garbage there, or a single certificate holder involved in any aspect of their manufacture.
13   porkchopXpress   2021 Oct 6, 5:19pm  

Latest release from Project Veritas about Pfizer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUXGB5FzhPc
15   RC2006   2021 Oct 6, 7:32pm  

Patrick says
Another worst-case scenario:

Maybe the graphene or whatever makes the shot magnetic can cause blood clots on demand by exposing targeted people to some intense radio waves.

So various people could be caused to drop dead whenever the Pfizer/government complex wants to get rid of them.

Just sayin it may be possible.


This reminds me of a guy that was using rf and some chemical to disintegrate cancer. I think it was graphene, but I can't find it. Graphene would make a person more susceptible to some energy weapons.
16   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 6, 9:32pm  

Bd6r says
nano-garbage is used only to extract money from granting agencies, almost no practical applications as of now.


So why did one of the leading researchers suddenly have IRS problems right around the start of the plandemic, then just disappear?
18   Bd6r   2021 Oct 7, 1:50pm  

NuttBoxer says
So why did one of the leading researchers suddenly have IRS problems right around the start of the plandemic, then just disappear?

@NuttBoxer,

what is the name and affiliation of the researcher? I can check on this
19   Rin   2021 Oct 7, 2:00pm  

Graphene in essence, is a two-dimensional diamond lattice, Carbon-to-Carbon bonded sheet, which is why its extremely strong and highly durable.

The problem, esp with Graphene Oxide, even if its total electrical charge is 'neutral', is that it's been known to polymerize and once it's past some 7 nm size, the kidneys wouldn't be able to dispose of it like all the other trash in the blood stream.

Then, you're up the creek because you have something which the body has little way of enzymatic-ally eliminating and at best, it could be stored in fat cells in a type of a matrix so that it doesn't affect the body as a whole.
20   Bd6r   2021 Oct 7, 2:12pm  

Rin says
two-dimensional diamond lattice

graphite
diamond does not have multiple C-C bonds
22   Rin   2021 Oct 7, 2:51pm  

Bd6r says
diamond does not have multiple C-C bonds


Here's graphene ...



Here's diamond ...



The same basic idea of the strong Carbon-to-Carbon bond lattice but change the dimensions from 2 to 3.
23   Bd6r   2021 Oct 7, 2:52pm  

not that it matters, all carbons in diamond are sp3-hybridized, but in graphite/graphene sp2-hybridized
24   Rin   2021 Oct 7, 3:05pm  

Bd6r says
not that it matters, all carbons in diamond are sp3-hybridized, but in graphite/graphene sp2-hybridized


This is why so many researchers, not just in biopharma (and separation technologies), but also electronics, are interested in graphene because unlike diamond, it's more malleable and able to offer the same benefits of diamond's strength but w/o the limitations of a hardened 3-D crystal.
25   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 7, 3:15pm  

Bd6r says
what is the name and affiliation of the researcher? I can check on this


It was all over the real news networks when it happened, but I do not remember his name, and in a scrubbed internet, it may be hard to find. I believe he worked for Standford, and was accused of being a Chinese spy, then it was IRS, then he vanished. I invite you to do your own research if you're seriously interested. You could start with many of the posts I've made here. Or just search bio-digital convergence, nano-particles, re-engineering humans, and similar.

While I don't believe in aliens, I do believe the the black-ops that have been in operation in this country since the 50's have developed technology we are not aware of, and "space ships", are an example. Nano technology is not new, there has articles even in the public space going back more than 10 years talking about it's applications.

But maybe you have a better explanation for why graphene oxide is in these shots, that has nothing to do with implanting wires and transistors, despite that being a perfect application of graphene oxide, 5g, and The Shot. Maybe you just believe in a LOT of coincidences..?
26   Rin   2021 Oct 7, 3:39pm  

NuttBoxer says

But maybe you have a better explanation for why graphene oxide is in these shots, that has nothing to do with implanting wires and transistors, despite that being a perfect application of graphene oxide, 5g, and The Shot. Maybe you just believe in a LOT of coincidences..?


Here's my explanation ... laziness, idiocy, and looking for a quick fix.

The mRNA fragment, roaming the body or even the cell itself, gets chopped up by restriction enzymes which prevent your latest broccoli or avocado meal, from expressing its genes in your body. This is why we don't develop green skin nor grow sprouts on our skin, whenever we eat these vegetables. This is why most mRNA vaxxes will fail w/o a lot of biomedical engineering.

Therefore, the mRNA vax needs ways of shielding against this as well as being able to slide around the body at will. First the phospholipid and cholesterol wrapping makes the mRNA look like 'food stuff', then the graphene oxide coating, allows it to move from the shoulder injection point and into anywhere else in the body, without resistance as the carbon lattice protects it from all the body's defenses (as well as the general kinetics of degradation during mass transport) until the mRNA arrives at let's say the Spleen, the Pancreas, the Liver, the Heart, you name it.
27   Bd6r   2021 Oct 8, 6:31am  

NuttBoxer says
But maybe you have a better explanation for why graphene oxide is in these shots, that has nothing to do with implanting wires and transistors, despite that being a perfect application of graphene oxide, 5g, and The Shot. Maybe you just believe in a LOT of coincidences..?

I don't see any reason for putting graphene oxide in vaccines. My suspicion is that chemically illiterate people confuse something else for graphene oxide.

This is what Malone says: https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1430916614258561026

Regarding the Japanese / Moderna contamination issue. The probability is that this is a fill/finish problem due to machines not being properly adjusted. This is a surprisingly common problem. If true, then this also exposes a larger underlying quality control problem. small glass chips, metal chips, and stopper material chips in the vialed product are all signs of this type of issue.

In an older tweet he said that people confuse the aggregation of mrna in vaccine with graphene oxide.

Just as bad, but as Rin says above result of incompetence and laziness. Also, I think it is PEG derivatives, not graphene oxide that is added to vaccines.

Most of these "articles" contain shocking lack of chemistry knowledge. Forced vaccinations are bad enough, and we don't need to invent additional scary stories. If they are untrue, that gives arguments to vaccine mandate supporters.
28   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 8, 12:32pm  

Rin says
Here's my explanation ... laziness, idiocy, and looking for a quick fix.

A quick fix for what? The quick part is contradicted by the numerous patents around covid going back to the turn of the century, and to the DARPA funded of Moderna MRNA research around 2013. The fix part stands is contradicted by everything that's happening from a health perspective, but maybe you think it's to "fix" something unrelated to health? And in this case what would you propose?

Rin says
Therefore, the mRNA vax needs ways of shielding against this as well as being able to slide around the body at will. First the phospholipid and cholesterol wrapping makes the mRNA look like 'food stuff', then the graphene oxide coating, allows it to move from the shoulder injection point and into anywhere else in the body, without resistance as the carbon lattice protects it from all the body's defenses (as well as the general kinetics of degradation during mass transport) until the mRNA arrives at let's say the Spleen, the Pancreas, the Liver, the Heart, you name it.


This is exactly what it's NOT supposed to do. It's supposed to remain in the arm. This is the main cause of damage to the body(the fact that it moves). Again, not seeing a lot of evidence contradicting what I'm saying.
29   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 8, 12:38pm  

Bd6r says
I don't see any reason for putting graphene oxide in vaccines.


Agreed.

Bd6r says
The probability is that this is a fill/finish problem due to machines not being properly adjusted.


Causing the contents of the shot to be almost entirely graphene oxide? And that not being intentional!?

Bd6r says
If they are untrue, that gives arguments to vaccine mandate supporters.


So consent is only relevant as long as everyone tells the truth? The minute one person tells one lie, you now have the right to line 'em up and inject 'em?
30   richwicks   2021 Oct 8, 12:41pm  

NuttBoxer says
Bd6r says
The probability is that this is a fill/finish problem due to machines not being properly adjusted.


Causing the contents of the shot to be almost entirely graphene oxide? And that not being intentional!?


It could very well be that the claim that "the vaccines are filled with graphine oxide" are simply false. That's most likely the case.
31   NuttBoxer   2021 Oct 8, 12:42pm  

So from the above, it sounds like your both saying because you don't want to believe in a larger plan at work here, that's your sole reason for rejecting bio-digital convergence, despite the plethora of government sponsored documentation praising it's potential uses and benefits. Well, I don't want to believe it either, but just because it makes me uncomfortable, doesn't mean I'm going to stop my ears, close my eyes, and pray it all starts making sense soon.

I would invite you to be a little uncomfortable, dig a little deeper into the many connections that point towards this being very planned, very intentional, and very much your future if you don't face it and fight back.
32   Bd6r   2021 Oct 8, 12:57pm  

NuttBoxer says
So consent is only relevant as long as everyone tells the truth? The minute one person tells one lie, you now have the right to line 'em up and inject 'em?

That is not what I said and meant, you are extrapolating. If "our side" is producing easily refutable nonsense, we will be listened to much less, and baby will be thrown out with bath water. People who waver in their doubts will be more difficult to convince. There was a video on rumble, shared on Patnet, where a lady was going off about graphene oxides and PEG's made from ethylene oxide, and did not know the difference. We should listen to people such as Malone, and not random persosn who have little knowledge of chemistr and biology.

NuttBoxer says
Causing the contents of the shot to be almost entirely graphene oxide? And that not being intentional!?

I don't think it is graphene oxide. I don't even think it contains graphene oxide. Malone himself has said that people confuse the aggregates of mrna with graphene oxide. Perhaps "graphene oxide" contaminant story is a plant by our beloved gubbermint to discredit vaccine sceptics.

NuttBoxer says
So from the above, it sounds like your both saying because you don't want to believe in a larger plan at work here, that's your sole reason for rejecting bio-digital convergence, despite the plethora of government sponsored documentation praising it's potential uses and benefits. Well, I don't want to believe it either, but just because it makes me uncomfortable, doesn't mean I'm going to stop my ears, close my eyes, and pray it all starts making sense soon.

I would invite you to be a little uncomfortable, dig a little deeper into the many connections that point towards this being very planned, very intentional, and very much your future if you don't face it and fight back.

Blackrock owns most media. Blackrock owns most pharma company stocks. Blackrock profits if our gubbermint forces everyone to perpetually vaccinate, and takes OUR money and gives it to pharma companies. Nearly all media support this because they are owned by Blackrock. That seems to me like the simplest explanation. May be there is something else, but I don't have proof for it. Perhaps we are being trained to be obedient; perhaps there are more unknown unknowns. They are unlikely related to non-existent graphene oxide in vaccines and 5G death rays.
33   Ceffer   2021 Oct 8, 5:06pm  

Would you believe 95 percent graphene oxide?
34   BoomAndBustCycle   2021 Oct 8, 6:58pm  

There is more garage and bad stuff in the food and drink the general population consumes on a daily basis that adds up to be far worse for our health than any once a year vaccine shots.

Almost every adult I know over 30 has some form of IBS or stomach issues… skinny or fat from the seed oils and crap in basically everything in the grocery store.
35   Bd6r   2021 Oct 8, 7:40pm  

Ceffer says
Would you believe 95 percent graphene oxide?

Absolutely not
36   Rin   2021 Oct 9, 7:59am  

NuttBoxer says
This is exactly what it's NOT supposed to do. It's supposed to remain in the arm. This is the main cause of damage to the body(the fact that it moves). Again, not seeing a lot of evidence contradicting what I'm saying.


Bd6r says

Just as bad, but as Rin says above result of incompetence and laziness.


Here's a comment on the above, don't you think ... that for the most part, a lot of micelles (phospholipid complexes) with mRNA fragments inside them, wouldn't survive in the body for very long?

Along with the cell interpreting the mRNA as a foreign organism, there are also intracellular shearing forces which can break up the micelles over time.

So thus, it's conceivable that w/o the wrapper of Graphene Oxide, that there's little chance of a critical mass of mRNA fragments surviving (as in the billions), to pull off the heist of taking over ribosomal complexes in mass across multiple organ systems.
37   Ceffer   2021 Oct 9, 11:01am  

Would you believe 85 percent graphene oxide?
38   Bd6r   2021 Oct 9, 11:08am  

Rin says
So thus, it's conceivable that w/o the wrapper of Graphene Oxide, that there's little chance of a critical mass of mRNA fragments surviving (as in the billions), to pull off the heist of taking over ribosomal complexes in mass across multiple organ systems.

I have seen no proof of graphene oxide in the vaccines. I have not seen graphene oxide used for stabilizing any vaccines. I do not know what type of mechanism would stabilize micelles and if graphene oxide, which is a huge aromatic surface, would wrap around those particular micelles.
39   Bd6r   2021 Oct 9, 11:11am  

Ceffer says
Would you believe 85 percent graphene oxide?

absolutely not. I would not believe also 75, 65, 55, 45, 35, 25, 15, or 5%
40   Bd6r   2021 Oct 9, 11:28am  

Analysis of the report in OP: https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/07/whitney-webb-interview-is-there-graphene-oxide-in-the-covid-19-injections/

Two hrs, but they trash it and say that this graphene stuff is made up to take heat off problems cause by spike protein which are well-documented

Comments 1 - 40 of 80       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions