patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,198,316 comments by 14,128 users - RC2006, The_Deplorable, UkraineIsTotallyFucked online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 41 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
43
Ceffer
2021 Mar 8, 5:41pm
Ceffer
2021 Mar 8, 5:41pm
"Your DNA and your body are the property of the Crown, the City of London, the Vatican and the foreign city state of Washington DC. We will manipulate them and dispose of them as we please."
44
Patrick
2021 Mar 8, 5:42pm
Patrick
2021 Mar 8, 5:42pm
Ceffer says
Exactly. The Sicilians say "The fish rots from the head down."
And we have extremely corrupt people in power, people who brag about it, like Biden bragging about making US aid contingent on not fucking with a company that was paying off his son in a no-work job.
Biden is utter scum.
Trickle down lawlessness
Exactly. The Sicilians say "The fish rots from the head down."
And we have extremely corrupt people in power, people who brag about it, like Biden bragging about making US aid contingent on not fucking with a company that was paying off his son in a no-work job.
Biden is utter scum.
45
MisdemeanorRebel
2021 Mar 8, 6:09pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2021 Mar 8, 6:09pm
Apparently Xiden forgot his mask at the White House, and forgot the name of his SecDef
46
Ceffer
2021 Mar 8, 6:14pm
Ceffer
2021 Mar 8, 6:14pm
MisdemeanorRebel says
Maybe he should have waved a blond haired leg at him, like dog to a bone.
Apparently Xiden forgot his mask at the White House, and forgot the name of his SecDef
Maybe he should have waved a blond haired leg at him, like dog to a bone.
47
GNL
2021 Mar 8, 7:10pm
GNL
2021 Mar 8, 7:10pm
Patrick says
It may be time to become Sicilian. Know what I mean?
Ceffer saysTrickle down lawlessness
Exactly. The Sicilians say "The fish rots from the head down."
And we have extremely corrupt people in power, people who brag about it, like Biden bragging about making US aid contingent on not fucking with a company that was paying off his son in a no-work job.
Biden is utter scum.
It may be time to become Sicilian. Know what I mean?
49
komputodo
2022 Mar 16, 12:45pm
komputodo
2022 Mar 16, 12:45pm
clambo says
Isn't asking for I.D. raciss? Don't you have a " right to be vaxxed"?
At first I showed my confirmation and my ID
Isn't asking for I.D. raciss? Don't you have a " right to be vaxxed"?
50
richwicks
2022 Mar 16, 1:04pm
richwicks
2022 Mar 16, 1:04pm
GlocknLoad says
@Booger:
I used tesseract to do this. I didn't proof-read it or even check it, but it should be close.
[1 Anonymous 02/06/15 (Fri) 17:45:08 @DEOfE225) No.1146880
File (hidey: 1423237508379.pna (113.41 kB, 1003x558, 1003:568, skeptic iews.pna)
Whether you're pro-vaccine, anti-vaccine, or fall somewhere in the middle, the questions you need to ask yourselves are as follows:
Do you want to live in a world, where you cannot freely refuse a medical procedure that carries risk of injury or death? I'm not questioning your comfort level with today's vaccine schedule, because today's vaccine schedule will change. New vaccines and additional doses are added all the time. children today receive as many as 49 doses of 14 vaccines before they reach age six, which is roughly 42 times higher than the number of vaccines administered to children back in 1940. With more than 220 new vaccines in the developmental pipeline for children and adults...and no end in sight..the question you must ask yourself is ARE YOU CERTAIN you will be 100% comfortable with vaccines that are added to the mandated list in the future? If you say that yes, you're comfortable, then you're either a) not expecting to be a parent or grandparent, b) don't have to worry about it because your kids are grown and out of the house, or c) lying to prove a point. No critical thinker, no honest person, would ever sign off on the sight-unseen vaccine schedule of the future. And yet that's what you're doing when you condemn the people who are fighting for your right to refuse. YOU have the right to refuse, should you ever choose to use it, because the very "anti-vaccine" people you demonize have been fighting for us all. Right now, the burden of "herd immunity" falls on small children, but that is changing. Vaccine manufacturers see an untapped market in adult vaccines and are coming for you next. What will you do if your state, your employer, or your insurance company forces you to get a vaccine that you simply don't want? It hasn't happened to you yet, but if the right to refuse is eroded, it will happen to you sooner than you might think. Who then will you turn to? Your legislators who get campaign donations from pharmaceutical companies? The CDC that has former pharma executives sitting on the board? Who will you tum to if you ever want to say no? There will be no one. Once we enter the slippery slope of removing and individual's right to refuse medical procedures that carry a risk of injury or death, once we remove an individual's right to speak for himvherseff and hisiher children, we open ourselves up to an insidious new era, where other drugs and other procedures can be mandated. | heard (on NPR, interestingly enough) that there are people who want to test for a gene marker that's been found in mass shooters in the hopes that they can put the carriers of that gene on medications in early childhood. Sounds great, right? But many of us carry genes that will never be expressed. You could be a cartier of that gene. Or your child could be a carrier. So if we follow the "for the greater good" mentality behind vaccines (or the Nazi's "for the greater good” mentality behind eugenics (breeding out illness), we are looking at forcing people who may never express a sociopathic gene to take antipsychotics, just in case. Because that's what forced vaccination does. It asks children who may never come into contact with a particular virus to accept a vaccine just in case. And that's what eugenics was all about. It sterilizes people who can pass on a genetic disease just in case. Forced vaccination is a human rights violation, and to support it when you know that the government's own Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System exists and lists people who have died as a result of vaccines is unethical at best, sociopathic at worst. The ethical thing to do is to allow people their right to refuse and leave it up to doctors and big pharma (who have marketing budgets larger than the GDP of some countries) to do a better job of convincing parents that vaccines are safe. We can start by reversing the law that grants vaccine manufacturers total immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits. Because as it stands, you can't sue a vaccine manufacturer if your child is injured or killed by a vaccine, even in cases where they could've made a safer vaccine and chose not to or when they failed to recall a contaminated lot# in a timely manner. Think about that. You can't sue the manufacturer. That immunity from liability does more to shake parents’ confidence in vaccines than anything else out there.
Booger says
Are you able to copy past that in text form?
@Booger:
I used tesseract to do this. I didn't proof-read it or even check it, but it should be close.
[1 Anonymous 02/06/15 (Fri) 17:45:08 @DEOfE225) No.1146880
File (hidey: 1423237508379.pna (113.41 kB, 1003x558, 1003:568, skeptic iews.pna)
Whether you're pro-vaccine, anti-vaccine, or fall somewhere in the middle, the questions you need to ask yourselves are as follows:
Do you want to live in a world, where you cannot freely refuse a medical procedure that carries risk of injury or death? I'm not questioning your comfort level with today's vaccine schedule, because today's vaccine schedule will change. New vaccines and additional doses are added all the time. children today receive as many as 49 doses of 14 vaccines before they reach age six, which is roughly 42 times higher than the number of vaccines administered to children back in 1940. With more than 220 new vaccines in the developmental pipeline for children and adults...and no end in sight..the question you must ask yourself is ARE YOU CERTAIN you will be 100% comfortable with vaccines that are added to the mandated list in the future? If you say that yes, you're comfortable, then you're either a) not expecting to be a parent or grandparent, b) don't have to worry about it because your kids are grown and out of the house, or c) lying to prove a point. No critical thinker, no honest person, would ever sign off on the sight-unseen vaccine schedule of the future. And yet that's what you're doing when you condemn the people who are fighting for your right to refuse. YOU have the right to refuse, should you ever choose to use it, because the very "anti-vaccine" people you demonize have been fighting for us all. Right now, the burden of "herd immunity" falls on small children, but that is changing. Vaccine manufacturers see an untapped market in adult vaccines and are coming for you next. What will you do if your state, your employer, or your insurance company forces you to get a vaccine that you simply don't want? It hasn't happened to you yet, but if the right to refuse is eroded, it will happen to you sooner than you might think. Who then will you turn to? Your legislators who get campaign donations from pharmaceutical companies? The CDC that has former pharma executives sitting on the board? Who will you tum to if you ever want to say no? There will be no one. Once we enter the slippery slope of removing and individual's right to refuse medical procedures that carry a risk of injury or death, once we remove an individual's right to speak for himvherseff and hisiher children, we open ourselves up to an insidious new era, where other drugs and other procedures can be mandated. | heard (on NPR, interestingly enough) that there are people who want to test for a gene marker that's been found in mass shooters in the hopes that they can put the carriers of that gene on medications in early childhood. Sounds great, right? But many of us carry genes that will never be expressed. You could be a cartier of that gene. Or your child could be a carrier. So if we follow the "for the greater good" mentality behind vaccines (or the Nazi's "for the greater good” mentality behind eugenics (breeding out illness), we are looking at forcing people who may never express a sociopathic gene to take antipsychotics, just in case. Because that's what forced vaccination does. It asks children who may never come into contact with a particular virus to accept a vaccine just in case. And that's what eugenics was all about. It sterilizes people who can pass on a genetic disease just in case. Forced vaccination is a human rights violation, and to support it when you know that the government's own Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System exists and lists people who have died as a result of vaccines is unethical at best, sociopathic at worst. The ethical thing to do is to allow people their right to refuse and leave it up to doctors and big pharma (who have marketing budgets larger than the GDP of some countries) to do a better job of convincing parents that vaccines are safe. We can start by reversing the law that grants vaccine manufacturers total immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits. Because as it stands, you can't sue a vaccine manufacturer if your child is injured or killed by a vaccine, even in cases where they could've made a safer vaccine and chose not to or when they failed to recall a contaminated lot# in a timely manner. Think about that. You can't sue the manufacturer. That immunity from liability does more to shake parents’ confidence in vaccines than anything else out there.
51
Patrick
2022 Mar 16, 1:06pm
Patrick
2022 Mar 16, 1:06pm
richwicks says
Looks cool: https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract?source=patrick.net
Did you install it, or use some free online version?
I used tesseract to do this.
Looks cool: https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract?source=patrick.net
Did you install it, or use some free online version?
52
richwicks
2022 Mar 16, 1:09pm
richwicks
2022 Mar 16, 1:09pm
Patrick says
Installed it.
I could setup a free online version.
If you run CGI on this website, you could run it here.
richwicks saysI used tesseract to do this.
Looks cool: https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract?source=patrick.net
Did you install it, or use some free online version?
Installed it.
I could setup a free online version.
If you run CGI on this website, you could run it here.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
I previously was sent an invitation to register for the vaccine and choose the appointment time.
They used 2 step authentication for the process.
“Print the confirmation and bring it with you.”
I drove to the Palm Beach County fairgrounds. Signs then people directed traffic to parking.
There was a large temporary building with air conditioning, and a line of people shuffling inside.
At first I showed my confirmation and my ID
“You aren’t 65.” (It was for age 65 and above people)
“See my ID” He was convinced.
The rest of the crowd seemed older than I. I wondered to myself “why aren’t they dead from the terrible deadly virus?”
As I approached the injection table, they took my ID again to check me against the database of people approved to receive the vaccine.
Then, a fireman gave me the Moderna vaccine #1. I will return for #2 in several weeks.
There was no way for an interloper to get the vaccine.
I said to someone “Imagine if they did this on November third?”
“We’d have a different president.”
We were told to sit and hang out for 15 minutes before leaving.
There was excellent organization and I kept wondering “and yet there’s no income tax here.”