Comments 1 - 28 of 28 Search these comments
Antifa attempts to block rally of Trump supporters in Portland. pic.twitter.com/JtgBNIzQEQ
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 30, 2020
Antifa attempts to block rally of Trump supporters in Portland. pic.twitter.com/JtgBNIzQEQ
Mainstream science mulls 'global moratorium' on COVID vaccines as cancers rise, boosters flub
Publisher of Nature and Scientific American platforms COVID vaccine skeptics. CDC drafted alert about post-vaccination heart inflammation early in rollout but feared looking "alarmist," emails suggest.
Calling for governments to enact a "global moratorium" on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could have been a death sentence for a scientist's career not long ago. Now it opens the door to a prestigious science publisher.
The Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, sibling to Nature and Scientific American, published a peer-reviewed paper by high-profile mRNA vaccine critics last month, showing the growing mainstream openness to data and arguments once nitpicked if not ignored by publishers and suppressed by academia and Big Tech. ...
"The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted," the paper also states.
mRNA formulated with lipid nanoparticles is a transformative technology that has enabled the rapid development and administration of billions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses worldwide. However, avoiding unacceptable toxicity with mRNA drugs and vaccines presents challenges. Lipid nanoparticle structural components, production methods, route of administration and proteins produced from complexed mRNAs all present toxicity concerns. Here, we discuss these concerns, specifically how cell tropism and tissue distribution of mRNA and lipid nanoparticles can lead to toxicity, and their possible reactogenicity. We focus on adverse events from mRNA applications for protein replacement and gene editing therapies as well as vaccines, tracing common biochemical and cellular pathways. The potential and limitations of existing models and tools used to screen for on-target efficacy and de-risk off-target toxicity, including in vivo and next-generation in vitro models, are also discussed.
Another Study Finds mRNA Vaccines Impair the Immune System
Study in Clinical And Experimental Medicine Journal
Four years after the biggest human experiment began, scientists are confirming what they already knew. mRNA vaccines have never been approved before because they always fail on this key point that scientists are re-confirming over and over again.
This latest study was published in Clinical and Experimental Medicine and was called mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1
"Over the last 24 months, there has been growing evidence of a correlation between mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters and increased prevalence of COVID-19 infection and other pathologies. Recent works have added possible causation to correlation. mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. The opportunity for mRNA vaccine boosters to impair the immune system response needs careful consideration, as this impacts the cost-to-benefit ratio of the boosters’ practice."
They note that “undesirable outcomes observed after vaccination may be associated with the proinflammatory properties of the lipid nanoparticles or the delivered mRNA in the vaccine formulation”.
According to one of the papers reviewed, already in 2021, “the immune function was better among unvaccinated individuals than vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of the two doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine”. Even the EU Medicine Agency warned about the impact of repeated boosters on the immune system. ...
One of the final sentences in the paper is something you would have been banned for saying in 2021 - “Natural immunity is far superior to that achieved by vaccination, as well-known since 2021”.
Moderna Scientists Admit mRNA Shots Carry Toxicity Risks
... The scientists made the admission in a new scientific paper about the mRNA technology used in their COVID-19 vaccine.
These risks are associated with the use of modified messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology.
The mRNA is delivered by lipid nanoparticles (LNP).
The paper was published by Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, a peer-reviewed review journal published by the prestigious Nature Portfolio. ...
Some of the cited papers report the presence of mRNA and spike protein from Moderna’s vaccine in different parts of the human body weeks or months after vaccination.
This contradicts earlier claims from health officials that these materials would exit the body within days.
Anybody else get the feeling they knew mRNA came with a shitload of adverse effects and used COVID to introduce it, knowing that going the standard approval route would require decades of adjustments and come out the end being reserved only for very high risk individuals?
There were lots of great moments, but to give you some a taste of what Colorado’s lawyers were up against, here’s a short clip of possibly the most liberal Justice on the Court, and you can tell she wasn’t buying it:
CLIP: Justice Ketanji Jackson appears very skeptical over Trump ‘insurrection’ challenge (2:32).
https://twitter.com/Rightanglenews/status/1755642314775564468
New Orleans readers recognized a vicious layer of vindication in Lauren’s selection. Not only did she become the first mainstream faith artist featured at the Superbowl, but it was also a turnaround story, a completely different reversal. The mild-mannered singer, 33, had been canceled in 2020 by New Orlean’s disastrous mayor LaToya Cantrell, after Lauren sang at a Christian anti-lockdown event during covid. Mayor Cantrell was displeased and made it her personal mission to smear Lauren, and using her Mayoral offices, got Lauren deleted from her upcoming, career-making slot on Dick Clark’s New Year. Here is Lauren discussing her cancelation experience:
https://x.com/RaymondArroyo/status/1887176510618148908
For the courageous Ms. Daigle, who sacrificed her breakthrough moment to stand up for others, it was a terrific turnabout. Last night, Lauren gracefully transitioned from being officially labeled a “menace to the public” —and not in the good, rap-music way, but in the bad, Typhoid Mary way— after five years being launched like a touchdown pass back from that despondent low point to now delivering the most patriotic song at the Superbowl. ...
Meanwhile, Taylor Swift, 35, also attended the game, presumably in her role as girlfriend of Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, whose lackluster performance was widely reported as “subdued.” Maybe it was just accidental that the show producers first highlighted President Trump, who delighted the audience to rapturous applause. Then the game camera panned to Taylor Swift, the cobra-charming mega-celebrity, who seemed completely confused that the audience responded with sustained boos. It was a dramatic reversal of fortunes for the pop star. I’m not sure Ms. Swift had ever faced an unfriendly crowd before last night. ...
It was several classic reversals of fortune, playing out on —love it or hate it— the grandest stage in American pop culture. The Chiefs fell from dominant dynasty to humbling defeat, Lauren Daigle rose from Covid-era cancellation to the Superbowl spotlight, and Taylor Swift—once pop’s untouchable darling—got a taste of audience rejection, setting a new low point in her meticulously curated career.
The layers of cultural meaning in this Superbowl ran deep. Daigle’s moment wasn’t just about singing America the Beautiful—it was a symbolic return of something more profound: the unapologetic embrace of faith, patriotism, and traditional American values — in a public space where they’ve often been benched, eclipsed by corporatized, virtue-signaling messaging designed to be offensive and to get in your face.
The optics of Daigle’s salubrious performance juxtaposed against Swift’s chilly reception will be hard to forget.
And then there’s Mayor Cantrell’s karma coming due. The same sneering bureaucrat who worked to cancel Daigle for daring to sing at a peaceful covid protest is now under the kind of “wide-ranging probe” that ends political careers. Another stunning switcheroo.


Something is happening. Former democrat Christina Buttons (87K followers), who rage-quit the Daily Wire after disagreeing with conservative co-hosts about being “mean” to trans people, such as by refusing to use ungrammatical pronouns, yesterday executed a flawless flip turn:
I was wrong and TERFs, gender-criticals, and conservatives were right all
along to "hold the line" and refuse to give an inch to any aspect of
transgender ideology. I'm sorry I ever doubted their approach.
9:33 AM • Jul 1, 2025 703.4K Views
Christina’s tweet is the kind of rhetorical tectonic shift signaling a broader cultural realignment. Christina, who previously clung to a moderate or even sympathetic position in gender discourse, is now explicitly siding with groups historically dismissed as “extreme” like TERFs, gender-critical feminists, and conservatives. (She’s been working up to it lately, running a series on her Substack about detransitioner experiences. She currently works with Chris Rufo at the Manhattan Institute.)
Not only did she admit her error, she endorsed conservatives’ hardcore strategy of zero compromise, a wild departure from the incrementalist, live-and-let-live middle ground.
That kind of public mea culpa —delivered on Twitter to 700k+ viewers— is a neon-lit bellwether. When former fence-sitters start echoing the language of hardliners, and aren’t afraid to publicly say so, it means the cultural clouds are clearing. Momentum is shifting. And the Overton window is flying open with a loud thump. In the very recent past, voicing sympathy for TERFs or gender-critical conservatives was career kryptonite. Now, it’s a badge of credibility; maybe even applause-worthy, if the comments to her post were any measure.
The cancel-culture fear police are losing their jurisdiction. The conversational chilling effect is thawing. When formerly cautious voices start saying the quiet part out loud, it means the cultural current hasn’t merely shifted. It’s reversing in full gear.
@CynicalPublius
We are currently watching the wokest elements of the left realizing in real
time that they a are a tiny minority and that most Americans hate them
and their ideas.
For a long time they thought they were the dominant force in America,
socially and politically.
It is now dawning on them, one by one, that they have no power and--
worse--that they are reviled and loathed.
It's happening right before our eyes like watching a spring flower unfurl
its petals.
I for one am enjoying it immensely.
We are currently watching the wokest elements of the left realizing in real
time that they a are a tiny minority and that most Americans hate them
and their ideas.
For a long time they thought they were the dominant force in America,
socially and politically.
We are currently watching the wokest elements of the left realizing in real
time that they a are a tiny minority and that most Americans hate them
and their ideas.

The movie “After the Hunt,” released to theaters last Friday, is a tense psychological drama. It was produced by Amazon-MGM Studios, internationally distributed by Sony Pictures, and directed by lauded Italian filmmaker Luca Guadagnino.
In the film, Julia Roberts plays Alma, a tenure-track, Ivy League philosophy professor for whom life is at first going swimmingly. But soon, a fateful cocktail party at her home upends her life. After a night of drinking, her star student Maggie (above left) accuses Alma’s close colleague Hank of sexual assault. Maggie never provides details —was it a kiss? An embrace? Something more? Hank denies it, and claims Maggie is making up the assault because he’d accused her of plagiarism.
Sound familiar?
The fallout is predictable: despite a lack of evidence or even details, Hank is fired, Alma —who tries unsuccessfully to walk a neutral line between her friends— loses tenure, and darker secrets emerge in the story’s foreground, while in the background the woke university inexorably grinds everyone except the diverse Maggie into a grisly professional paste.
That a major studio made this movie with an A-list actress and top-tier director is, frankly, the most astonishing sign of the counter-revolution we’ve seen to date.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,872 comments by 15,721 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, porkchopXpress, stfu online now