Comments 1 - 24 of 24 Search these comments
Note: the writer doesn't think the UK police are bound by the First Amendment, speaking comparatively
Bullshit. There are anti-free speech laws on the books that are enforced in the UK all the time that would be thrown out of court here.
Do we still have the Constitutional right to free assembly, or not?
I am very sure it is unconstitutional. Problem is, that doesn't stop politicians from doing it anyway and depend on not being taken to court over it. The other problem is The General Welfare clause of the constitution. That clause is quite the bitch and I'd think it will eventually be used for everything.
Change my mind.
It’s does stop, but that involves citizens taking up arms.
What part of "stay-at-home order" do you not understand?
WASHINGTON, D.C.—According to sources at the National Archives, doctors rushed the United States Constitution to the hospital and were forced to hook the document up to a ventilator after it began having trouble breathing Sunday afternoon.
The document reportedly slipped into a coma en route to the emergency room and was in critical condition for many hours. Doctors confirmed the worst: the founding document of our nation was infected with the novel coronavirus. Finally, surrounded by one or two mourners, as most people in Washington abandoned it a long time ago, it slipped away Sunday night.
"Between both political parties constantly trampling all over the Bill of Rights and stretching and distorting the Constitution for political gain whenever it's convenient, I just don't know how much more abuse it could have taken," said one doctor as he pronounced the Constitution's time of death: 20:20, ironically.
The 232-year-old Constitution has had its share of health scares, nearly being killed in the 1860s, the 1930s and 40s, and the early 2000s, but medical experts say this last crisis was just more than it could take. ...
>>>> https://www.marketwatch.com/story/authorities-are-now-using-thermal-imaging-to-help-police-enforce-social-distancing-rules-2020-04-02
>>>>
>>>> hey, might it just be that "social distancing" means abrogation of First Amendment right of peaceable free assembly?
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_assembly
>>>>
>>>> Congress shall make no law abridging the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . . . .
>>>>
>>>> yes, "health & safety" considerations MUST abolish the Constitution . . . we MUST be "safe", YOU KNOW!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> "If once you give up your freedom in exchange for safety, in the end you shall have neither . . . " --Benjamin Franklin
>>>>
>>>> (not the verbatim quote -- actual quote was "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety")
>>
>> I got a lot of interesting feedback from this one, sent to a group of friends
>>
>> a lawyer told me that although my First Amendment argument was "clever, very clever" he would counter-argue that persons going out knowingly infected with CV was a sort of violence, and hence not a First Amendment protected act
Note: the writer doesn't think the UK police are bound by the First Amendment, speaking comparatively