Comments 1 - 40 of 42 Next » Last » Search these comments
Last June, PayPal announced a new partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), whereby the liberal activist group would identify individuals and groups whose ideology is, in the eyes of the ADL, “extremist.” This would enable not only PayPal but financial services companies around the world to then terminate their accounts and exclude them from the financial system. Clearly, once the ADL declares a person or group to be “extremist” and PayPal banishes them, no other mainstream corporation will want to be accused of hosting them. As PayPal's founding Chief Operating Officer David Sacks warned at the time the partnership was announced, the purpose of this program is “shutting down people and organizations that express views that are entirely lawful, even if they are unpopular in Silicon Valley.” Comparing this to the spate of unified Silicon Valley censorship that has erupted over the last several years, Sacks explained why this power is so alarming:As for the notion of building your own PayPal or Facebook: because of their gigantic network effects and economies of scale, there is no viable alternative when the whole industry works together to deny you access.Kicking people off social media deprives them of the right to speak in our increasingly online world. Locking them out of the financial economy is worse: It deprives them of the right to make a living. We have seen how cancel culture can obliterate one’s ability to earn an income, but now the cancelled may find themselves without a way to pay for goods and services. Previously, cancelled employees who would never again have the opportunity to work for a Fortune 500 company at least had the option to go into business for themselves. But if they cannot purchase equipment, pay employees, or receive payment from clients and customers, that door closes on them, too.This is why it is so imperative for the Democratic Party and their media allies to describe the four-hour riot at the Capitol on January 6 as an insurrection and attempted coup. If those are mere protesters or even just rioters, then all the standard protections and legal safeguards apply to them, as liberals demanded be applied to protect BLM and Antifa protesters, even ones who used violence. If, however, they are part of a broader insurrectionary movement — an ongoing attempt to overthrow the U.S. Government — then they are elevated from ordinary political adversaries into a faction of sustained criminality, and anything and everything, from censorship and detention to extra-legal means of banishment such as no-fly lists and exclusion from the financial system, becomes justified, even necessary. (Note that such repressive tactics, cheered by liberals and even many on the left, have often swept up anti-establishment voices on the left, such as when PayPal banned Antifa-linked individuals along with Proud Boys members, and when animal rights activists are targeted for persecution by the FBI along with Oath Keepers, but such is the inevitable outcome of censorship and dissent-repressive schemes).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Defamation_League What is needed now is for white people to create their own ADL for exactly the same reasons: to fight anti-white bigotry and hatred.
Many folks have pointed out a missing voice: the so-called Jewish Anti-Defamation League, which went radio silent in the wake of the Canadian Nazi scandal. These days, the ADL seems more like a woke political money-laundering operation than anything else.
The defense tried to blame a black janitor. Frank owned the company where the janitor and his victim worked.
The Black Janitor, Jim Conley, was first interviewed trying to wash blood from his shirt at the factory. Conley later went on to rape a girl after Frank was convicted
Source? What girl? What was her name? Surely he would have been killed for that, as a black man, unless the girl he raped was also black.
He stepped into the first floor vestibule and walked toward the stairs to the second floor. But a movement in the shadows caught his attention. He was riveted by the scene before him: Jim Conley standing beside a trap door clutching the wilted body of a young white girl. Her head lolled on the man's right shoulder. She seemed either dead or unconscious. He saw no blood, no wounds, no rope.The janitor looked over his left shoulder at the boy and their eyes locked. They faced each other for a few moments before the man spoke. ''If you ever mention this, I'll kill you,'' he said.The frightened youngster fled back to the front door and ran outside. On arriving home, he told his mother what he had seen and recalled her saying: ''For God's sake, don't tell anybody else about this. You just stay out of it.''
I read this a while ago, I'll find the source. It was Jim Conley's original attorney who realized Conley was probably guilty when he began looking at Conley's long criminal record that included brawls.
This was in Georgia. 4 of the jurors were Jewish and the trial was in 1913. It went to the Supreme Court. That jury decided to have Leo Frank put to death over Jim Conley.
We didn't have the communication system we do now in 1913.
Even Conley's own lawyer - who was hired by one of the papers that presumed Frank's guilt before the trial began - came to believe he did it after the trial, William Smith.
I don't much care what media says. They lie and since the ADL which is a completely corrupt scam organization built around this case, they will never tell the truth.
As a young law student back in in 1987, I read an article about "human rights violations" being perpetrated by Israel in the National Law Review. Never a shrinking violet, I dashed off a letter to the editor in protest. A couple of days after it was printed, two letters arrived in my law school mailbox, both of them antisemitic and threatening. I was a bit spooked, so I called the Chicago office of the Anti-Defamation League.A fellow named Michael Lieberman invited me to come in, and when I showed him the letters, he recognized one of the authors, a known crank with many disturbing qualities by the name of Anthony Martin-Trigona. The man is a serial litigant who has by now filed over 250 political lawsuits, but he was also essentially harmless, Michael explained. ADL would "file" my letters. Case closed.Back then, the ADL adhered to the values America was founded upon. It existed to protect Jews from attacks and did so within the confines of free speech values, albeit with a liberal slant. I know because after my encounter with ADL in 1987, I volunteered as an ADL legal intern. It was fun, and I did believe I was doing good. Everyone believed that. And it was true.The ADL taught me that nastygrams from Jew haters were just the price we pay for liberty, worthy of being filed and forgotten. This is not Weimar Germany; it is America. We have a First Amendment, we have civil rights, we have a working democracy. That is part of the good we have done.But the ADL no longer believes this. It has become part of a great online censorship machine that is being exposed day after day as an anti-free speech enterprise.
I supplied some links, if you check them out, great, if not, no skin off my ass.
"I’d suggest corporate America should boycott hiring students graduating from any of these odious institutions"It's happening! The key is the new fracture line between fascist Democrats (but I repeat myself) and Jews. The ADL in particular was entirely on board with the "white supremacy" slander against the most accepting and tolerant group in human history, white people, as long the slanderers were careful to exempt Jews.But that wall has been breached, and Jews are now fair game for fascist Democrats. The ADL's own Frankenstein monster is after it! One good result is that Wall Street is now using Democrats' cancel culture against itself, blacklisting students for failing to limit their slander to just regular white people.
The Black Janitor, Jim Conley, was first interviewed trying to wash blood from his shirt at the factory. He lied about being illiterate. His own girlfriend testified Conley told her he did it.
Comments 1 - 40 of 42 Next » Last » Search these comments