0
0

Trump might get impeached


 invite response                
2019 Oct 2, 3:15pm   692 views  9 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (13)   💰tip   ignore  

* The Senate will declare him to be a naughty boy and censure him, he stays in office.
* The remaining "Exhausted Middle" voters will be pissed... at the democrats
* Trump wins 2020.

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   Shaman   2019 Oct 2, 8:44pm  

It’s not going to come to that. Looks like the entire Ukraine case was a donkey construct and will slowly explode in their faces.
2   Tenpoundbass   2019 Oct 2, 8:57pm  

BRILLIANT! Corrupt Congressional Dems Ask Trump State Dept for Ukrainian Docs – Get Crooked Hillary and Biden Docs Instead!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/brilliant-corrupt-congressional-dems-ask-trump-state-dept-for-ukrainian-docs-get-crooked-hillary-and-biden-docs-instead-video/
3   komputodo   2019 Oct 2, 9:01pm  

NoCoupForYou says
Trump might get impeached

I agree...but pretty much anything MIGHT happen....stock market MIGHT crash...stock market MIGHT hit new highs...lol
4   richwicks   2019 Oct 2, 10:32pm  

Quigley says
It’s not going to come to that. Looks like the entire Ukraine case was a donkey construct and will slowly explode in their faces.


Do you mean that you believe Biden is innocent of corruption?

If this is the case, can you please explain to me how Hunter Biden ended up on the board of directors of Burisma, when he had no qualifications for the job, and why he was paid around $50,000 a month to do this "job"? Why did Joe Biden insist on the firing of the prosecutor looking into corruption of Burisma - why would Biden care and what business would it be for him anyhow? Why did it make a billion dollar loan contingent on this prosecutor being fired?

But since you're calling it a "donkey" construct, I suspect you mean it will blow up in the Democrat's faces - well really, this isn't just exclusively Democrats. There's a mafia running the federal government, and I doubt Biden was the only one milking this cow.
5   Ceffer   2019 Oct 2, 10:40pm  

Trump will be the first President to make impeachment look like a badge of honor.

When a pack of crooks and hypocrites abuse their powers to impeach you on false premises for purely political purposes, what does it mean?
6   richwicks   2019 Oct 2, 11:28pm  

Ceffer says
Trump will be the first President to make impeachment look like a badge of honor.

When a pack of crooks and hypocrites abuse their powers to impeach you on false premises for purely political purposes, what does it mean?


This is a coup attempt, it was started before Trump even walking into office. Do you remember Maxine Waters ranting about "resist"? Resist what, exactly? A democratic election? Considering what the DNC did to Bernie Sanders, it appears to be that way.

Did you ever realize how corrupt the government was before Trump walked into office? 3 years ago, I was deeply cynical about the government, but I was only about 10% cynical enough. They're just a group of criminals.

I didn't vote for Trump (certainly didn't vote for Clinton!) and I'm not a huge fan of him, but I hope he's made some real enemies, because his enemies, are my enemies, and yours. I'm happier with him than I am with Clinton in any case. She was just about the worst person imaginable to be run for president. She didn't only vote for the Authorization to Use Force in Iraq (that's the 2nd Iraq war, over a non existent weapons of mass destruction program) but she's the main reason Libya is in civil war today, with operating slavery markets. This is the opposition to the Bush Jr. party?

In any case, it seems like Trump, a classic 1960's Democrat, has reformed the Republican party a lot. Wish somebody would clean up the Democratic party. Schiff, Pelosi, Waters, they are all garbage. It's pathetic what sort of refuse they have running for the nomination. Tulsi Gabbard may be an exception, but she may just be controlled opposition. She's done some pretty weird things which is too bad, I had hope for her at one point.
7   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 3, 12:02am  

I hope he gets impeached and then the senate republicans run a long and thorough trial. They will bring in dozens of corrupt actors and question them under oath in public: Democrat house members, FBI agents, DOJ agents, CIA agents. It could go on for 5 years with dozens of people getting 20 year sentences.
8   richwicks   2019 Oct 3, 12:06am  

SunnyvaleCA says
I hope he gets impeached and then the senate republicans run a long and thorough trial. They will bring in dozens of corrupt actors and question them under oath in public: Democrat house members, FBI agents, DOJ agents, CIA agents. It could go on for 5 years with dozens of people getting 20 year sentences.


For what? Please don't respond with "for all the crimes he's done!!!"

Be specific.

You know what I hope? I hope all these criminals that run our nation end up in an offsite prison.
9   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 3, 12:40am  

richwicks says
SunnyvaleCA says
I hope he gets impeached and then the senate republicans run a long and thorough trial. They will bring in dozens of corrupt actors and question them under oath in public: Democrat house members, FBI agents, DOJ agents, CIA agents. It could go on for 5 years with dozens of people getting 20 year sentences.


For what? Please don't respond with "for all the crimes he's done!!!"

Be specific.

You know what I hope? I hope all these criminals that run our nation end up in an offsite prison.

Just for starters with Peter Strzok:
• What is the meaning of some of those text messages such as the "insurance plan"? (There are dozens of text messages worth reviewing.)
• Why didn't he recuse himself as being biased (as amply evidenced)?
• Why, when he wrote in the 302 that he did not think Michael Flynn was lying in his interview, did he not stand up for Michael Flynn when Flynn was being railroaded into a plea for crimes Strzok clearly didn't he committed? Did he think that was legal? Ethical?
• Why did he think Hillary Clinton's handling of classified information was merely "extremely careless"? (Strzok was the one that changed the wording from the devastating legal term "grossly negligent.") I'd really love to know how badly someone needs to behave with top-secret classified information to run afoul of the law.
• Trey Goudy might have some questions: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/12/congress-threatens-hold-strzok-contempt-after-firs/

Is that a sufficient start for you?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions