patrick.net

Patrick says

I remember that case. There was a documentary about it, called "death of a princess".

It was the first real expose on what the culture of Arabia, make that Islam, was really about, long before 9/11.

If anything, nothing going on today should be a surprise to anyone. Realize, Paul Freeman was in that film, and that's what's got him his casting in 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' as Belloq, because Spielberg was impressed by him.

Her name was Mishaal bint Fahd bin Mohammed Al Saud. Her grandfather the king ordered her shot to death, and after that was done the guy she was alleged to have committed "adultery" with was publicly decapitated by a member of her family.

curious2 says

Her name was Mishaal bint Fahd bin Mohammed Al Saud. Her grandfather the king ordered her shot to death, and after that was done the guy she was alleged to have committed "adultery" with was publicly decapitated by a member of her family.

If this happened in America, there would be no one left.

Strategist says

curious2 says

Her name was Mishaal bint Fahd bin Mohammed Al Saud. Her grandfather the king ordered her shot to death, and after that was done the guy she was alleged to have committed "adultery" with was publicly decapitated by a member of her family.

If this happened in America, there would be no one left.

This is true because angry parents wouldn't have to hire a hit man, instead, they'd just call the Sharia Police and tell 'em that their single daughter was guilty of adultery with another single guy (and one of the same religion and ethnicity). Wow! The USA would a "Killing Field', much like Cambodia back in the mid-70s.

Seriously, and you think that America was experiencing some racial divide, KSA is a lot worse!

Rin says

This is true because angry parents wouldn't have to hire a hit man, instead, they'd just call the Sharia Police and tell 'em that their single daughter was guilty of adultery with another single guy (and one of the same religion and ethnicity). Wow! The USA would a "Killing Field', much like Cambodia back in the mid-70s.

Seriously, and you think that America was experiencing some racial divide, KSA is a lot worse!

Here's a 911 Call ...

911 Operator: Sharia 911, how can we help you?

Parent: Help! Help! My daughter is about to run away with her boyfriend.

911 Operator: Ok, stay calm ... is she running away with a Christian, Jew, or Hindu?

Parent: Actually no, he's a Muslim.

911 Operator: Hmm ... is he some Sudanese fellow? Or perhaps, Turkish?

Parent: Well no, he's also an Arab.

911 Operator: That's a tough one ... did you say that she was single?

Parent: Well sort of, but I promised her to my in-bred 2nd cousin.

911 Operator: Ah, so she's promised! Let me check ... yes, that's a grandfathered adultery clause. So yes, we'll send in Abu Bakr & his 40 rapists/thugs to pick 'em up.

Parent: Oh thank you!

911 Operator: Hey no problem, that's what friends are for.

Rin says

angry parents

do not usually resort to child sacrifice, unless they are Muslim. Islam is the last major religion to command child sacrifice. We see it across the Islamic world, and wherever Muslims migrate. Jews and Christians do not practice child sacrifice, because Leviticus prohibits child sacrifice specifically and the new testament prohibits killing generally. Jews and Christians might disown their children, even mourn them as if dead, but only Muslims resort to actually murdering them.

curious2 says

Rin says

angry parents

do not usually resort to child sacrifice, unless they are Muslim. Islam is the last major religion to command child sacrifice. We see it across the Islamic world, and wherever Muslims migrate. Jews and Christians do not practice child sacrifice, because Leviticus prohibits child sacrifice specifically and the new testament prohibits killing generally. Jews and Christians might disown their children, even mourn them as if dead, but only Muslims resort to actually murdering them.

I guess I was referring to really angry parents, you know, the psychopathic ones.

It is perfectly permissible for a parent to kill his own child under Islamic law:

And in the classic manual of Islamic law, Umdat as-Salik wa ‘Uddat an-Nasik, we read:

Qisas is obligatory on whoever kills a person purely intentionally and aggressively (that is, not in self-defense). But qisas is not applicable on children or the insane under any circumstances, nor is it applicable on a Muslim for killing a kafir, nor on a free man for killing a slave, nor on a dhimmi for killing an apostate, nor on a father or a mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their child, or their child’s children.

Narrated Suraqah bin Malik bin [Ju'shum]: "The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) judged that the son is to suffer retaliation for [killing] his father, but the father is not to suffer retaliation for [killing] his son."

Grade : Da'if (Darussalam)
Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1399 In-book reference : Book 16, Hadith 15 English translation : Vol. 1, Book 14, Hadith 1399

It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “A father should not be killed for his son.”

Grade : Da'if (Darussalam)
English reference : Vol. 3, Book 21, Hadith 2661 Arabic reference : Book 21, Hadith 2763

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: that the Prophet (ﷺ) said: 'The Hudud are not carried in the Masjid, and the father is not killed for the son.'

https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/36852/ruling-on-parents-killing-their-child

Qisas means "revenge".

BTW, a Muslim may murder any non-Muslim (kafir) at any time, and that's just fine and dandy according to Islamic law:

Patrick says

nor is it applicable on a Muslim for killing a kafir

Patrick says

It is perfectly permissible for a parent to kill his own child under Islamic law:

Honor killings. Only Islam can convince it's followers to kill their child for honor. What a fucked up religion.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

bob2356 says

Nice job with that strawman. Keep on making shit up and claiming I said it.. The lengths you go to to create strawmen and misdirection are impressive.

Bob, it's not a strawman, nor is it Whataboutery. It's a direct regurgitation of your own words:

It's okay to execute Gays and Witches - and apparently unmarried Princesses for adultery - if you have a Trial based on Shari'a Law and Islamism. But not Muslim Brotherhood shills who are trying to pick up paperwork to divorce their wife in Saudi Arabia - so they only have to pay 130 days support.

i

My direct words were it's not front page news when someone is tried and executed according to a nations laws. The rest of the shit you just keep making up. Show one single place where I said anything was "ok" or not "ok" since obviously my statement I'm not offering my opinion on whether I condone or condemn was outside of you comprehension. .

Regurgitate is when you chew a bunch of stuff up, mix it up in your stomach. then throw it up all in a jumbled mess. So you are correct that you regurgitated.

Did you catch KSA's story of the day today? Well we sort of, kind of, may have, maybe planned it. But it was an accident that we planned it. It's like listening to a 5 year old explaining how the lamp got knocked off the table and broken. ROFLOL.

@bob2356 got a link for that?

bob2356 says

My direct words were it's not front page news when someone is tried and executed according to a nations laws. The rest of the shit you just keep making up. Show one single place where I said anything was "ok" or not "ok"

It's not always what you say, but also what you don't say that counts.
eg This Pakistani Anjem in London, never said he supports Osama, but flatly refuses to condemn him. What does that tell you?
Bob, you are such a slow learner. Please focus.