16
0

2nd Amendment Discussion


 invite response                
2018 Feb 17, 11:51am   251,217 views  1,304 comments

by CajunSteve   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

With all the talk about the school shootings, let's take a look at what the 2nd Amendment actually says:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Couple things to note in there:

1. The specific mention of a militia being the reason for the need to bear arms.
2. The 2nd Amendment never mentions the word gun at all.

So, what exactly is the definition of "arms"?

In 1755 Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language was first published. It defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.”

Weapons of offence would seem to include pretty much anything and everything, from knives to nuclear weapons. The US has already seen fit to ban some weapons of offence so the 2nd Amendment clearly has not been interpreted strictly as meaning that the US cannot ban all "arms". Therefore, the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee citizens the right to own whatever weapons they choose.

So it then becomes a question of which weapons should be banned, which should be strictly regulated, and which should be lightly regulated or not at all. Like anything else, we should weigh an individual's right with society's right. When looked at in that manner, it becomes very difficult to justify why fully automatic or semi automatic rifles should be allowed. What purpose do they serve an individual? And why would that purpose outweigh the extreme damage those weapons have cased society??

Patrick thinks the Chamber of Commerce is the worst organization, and he may be correct, but the NRA is not far behind.



« First        Comments 97 - 136 of 1,304       Last »     Search these comments

98   Booger   2018 Feb 19, 3:40pm  

When a cop fatally shoots someone, democrats blame the cop. When a democrat shoots someone, democrats blame the gun.
100   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 4:02pm  

bob2356 says
Hey, you guys keep claiming there is no such thing as an assault rifle, but want to use assault rifles in statistics. Sorry you can't have it both ways.


Which statistics would that be? The FBI?
101   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 4:02pm  

anon_8f378 says
let's move on to discussing actual relevant issues and solutions.


Good idea:

Grim Statistics On Child Drownings.

350 children under the age of five drown in pools each year nationwide.

Among unintentional injuries, drowning is the second leading cause of death to this age group after motor vehicle accidents. In some Sunbelt states such as California, Florida and Arizona, drowning is the leading cause of accidental death to children under five.

Another 2,600 children are treated in hospital emergency rooms each year for near-drowning incidents. Some of these submersion accidents result in permanent brain damage.

http://www.momsteam.com/sports/swimming/safety/grim-statistics-on-child-drownings


We need to BAN swimming pools. No one needs a pool filled with water in their backyard.

More kids die from needless drowning than being killed by AR-15's.

Where's your concern about these children?

So, having a swimming pool in a household is something like 4.3 to 5.6 times as likely to lead to an accidental death as having a firearm, when we look at the numbers for all age groups. For children less than 15, the difference is more like 19 to 25 times as likely.
103   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 7:05pm  

anon_0e666 says
The interesting thing about that list is that it shows society has a much higher tolarence for bad shit that happens where the relationship between cause and effect is well understood


Wrong.

Society has gotten use to many hundreds of thousands of deaths in that list because they happen so frequently. They've become desensitized. Does it make those deaths less important?

anon_0e666 says
Not so with things like a school shooting or other so called RANDOM acts of violence. Society has a much lower tolerance for these.


So society has a lower tolerance for something that happens rarely, and tolerates things that happen on a regular basis?

What's that truly say about society?
104   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 7:05pm  

anon_0e666 says
In fairness the distinction between banning guns and "banning heart disease" or any such absurdity- gun deaths are unique in that many of them are intentional


anon_0e666 says
Except for maybe abortion - notice how every other class of things on that list that kill people are not intentional


Really??

Obesity isn't intentional?
Stuffing your face with triple cheese burgers isn't intentional?
Smoking isn't intentional?
Alcoholism isn't intentional?
Drunk driving isn't intentional?
Drug overdose isn't intentional?
Many of the others on that list are from the intentional items I just listed.

Not intentional? Really??

There are no words....
105   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 7:06pm  

I think these threads on pat.net are a really good indication of how well propaganda works in the United States.

The NRA obviously knows how to appeal to a certain type of person--I'll give them that. They're actually using this tragedy to convince people that we need MORE guns in schools by arming teachers or adding God knows how many security guards.

Their bought and paid for Congressmen obviously spread the gospel, but it's amazing how many ordinary citizens fall for their propaganda as well.
107   MrMagic   2018 Feb 19, 9:09pm  

anon_3b28c says
They're actually using this tragedy to convince people that we need MORE guns in schools by arming teachers or adding God knows how many security guards.


Yes, security guards are never at a public places. Totally unheard of.

Wait.., cops are always at public sports games, NASCAR tracks, major concerts, parades, political and government buildings and all other types of large public events.

But asking to put security guards in schools to protect thousands of students or training teachers in CCW.... NOPE, we can't have that.

There you go folks, Liberal Logic at it's best!!
108   MrMagic   2018 Feb 19, 9:10pm  

anon_3b28c says
The NRA obviously knows how to appeal to a certain type of person--I'll give them that. They're actually using this tragedy to convince people that we need MORE guns in schools by arming teachers or adding God knows how many security guards.


There are like 4 - 5 million NRA members in the country but there are over 100 million gun owners in the country. Does that sound like the NRA has any type of leverage?

anon_3b28c says
I think these threads on pat.net are a really good indication of how well propaganda works in the United States.


Exactly.

You've bought the "guns need to be banned" Liberal narrative, hook, line and sinker!
109   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 9:10pm  

anon_cf6c6 says
The interesting thing about that list is that it shows society has a much higher tolarence for bad shit that happens where the relationship between cause and effect is well understood


Wrong.

Society has gotten use to many hundreds of thousands of deaths in that list because they happen so frequently. They've become desensitized. Does it make those deaths less important?


Yes - like the case of old age, in many ways those deaths ARE less important. In all those cases we know that bad shit happens, so we do some things to minimize them, but like old age, they all get you in the end so who gives a shit. That isn't the case with gun violence. Like terrorism, gun violence is random, it is senseless, and often the victims are innocent.

Note, for what its worth, I personally don't think we need to change the gun laws, but if you want to have an honest intellectual discussion, you must understand the uniqueness of gun violence relative to the rest of the who gives a shit deaths on that chart.


anon_cf6c6 says
So society has a lower tolerance for something that happens rarely, and tolerates things that happen on a regular basis?

What's that truly say about society?


We value predictability, and we abhor unpredictability. No more no less.
110   anonymous   2018 Feb 19, 9:10pm  

anon_cf6c6 says
anon_0e666 says
In fairness the distinction between banning guns and "banning heart disease" or any such absurdity- gun deaths are unique in that many of them are intentional


anon_0e666 says
Except for maybe abortion - notice how every other class of things on that list that kill people are not intentional


Really??

Obesity isn't intentional?
Stuffing your face with triple cheese burgers isn't intentional?
Smoking isn't intentional?
Alcoholism isn't intentional?
Drunk driving isn't intentional?
Drug overdose isn't intentional?
Many of the others on that list are from the intentional items I just listed.

Not intentional? Really??

There are no words....


Yes - that is correct. Not a single one of those things is done with an intent to kill the person. Death is a consequence of obesity, not the intent, Death is the consequence of alcoholism, smoking or any similar vice, but not the intent.
112   bob2356   2018 Feb 20, 7:43am  

Sniper says
There are like 4 - 5 million NRA members in the country but there are over 100 million gun owners in the country. Does that sound like the NRA has any type of leverage?


Putting up 54 million in NRA campaign contributions in 2016 might account for just a little bit of leverage.

Of course some people claim money doesn't affect elections or politicians votes. Even some right here on patnet.
113   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 20, 7:48am  

Unlike the Brady Campaign, the NRA is made up of millions of members and their contributions.

How many members does the Brady Campaign have? Two Million? haha

Which organization represents a mass movement, and a democratic membership, and which one represents a steering committee financed from wealthy foundations ?

May Democracy prevail against Elite preference.
114   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 8:03am  

Regarding that graphic with death rates:
1) The numbers are bogus.
2) The number of murders by gun is not the total deaths due to guns. That figure is about 35K. There are an additional 75K wounded.
3) We do what we can about the other things on the list. For example:
a) Drunk driving is against the law, and that had a big impact lowering accident rates by drunk drivers.
b) There are tons of efforts to curb obesity, heart disease, cancer, tobacco use, medical errors, and stroke. Just scan down that list, and you will see that gun deaths are pretty unique in how little we do about them.

We do have police, who are there to keep the peace in general. But the police don't have the tools to lower gun violence (self directed, accidental, or homicidal). We need to make universal license requirements for gun ownership, and make it more difficult to renew and easier to revoke the license. People are blaming the FBI for not investigating this shooter in FL. Perhaps they dropped the ball by not investigating, but the obvious truth is that they were powerless to do anything. The guy had a right to own the gun, and there isn't anything that law enforcement can do about it.
115   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 8:05am  

bob2356 says
Of course some people claim money doesn't affect elections or politicians votes. Even some right here on patnet.


There are even some here that claim gun ownership in homes is down the last few decades.
116   MrMagic   2018 Feb 20, 9:09am  

anon_d06f9 says
Yes - like the case of old age, in many ways those deaths ARE less important.


Well, isn't that nice.

anon_d06f9 says
Like terrorism, gun violence is random, it is senseless, and often the victims are innocent.


anon_d06f9 says
We value predictability, and we abhor unpredictability. No more no less.


OK, how about this unpredictability concerning children?



When are you going to start protesting Flu deaths of innocent children? When do the protest marches start trying to ban the flu?

Are these children's deaths just as unimportant like old people?
117   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 11:13am  

Sniper says
anon_d06f9 says
Yes - like the case of old age, in many ways those deaths ARE less important.


Well, isn't that nice.

anon_d06f9 says
Like terrorism, gun violence is random, it is senseless, and often the victims are innocent.


anon_d06f9 says
We value predictability, and we abhor unpredictability. No more no less.


OK, how about this unpredictability concerning children?



When are you going to start protesting Flu deaths of innocent children? When do the protest marches start trying to ban the flu?<...


The flu is ENTIRELY predictable. Each fall we lose somewhere between 50 and 500 people to a disease which once killed 500,000 americans. Thus while no one will ever say it, we are entirely ok with losing a few hundred kids per year (tough shit for them) because its predictable and expected. We also rejoice that as a nation via hard work we were able to get the death rate of the innocent down to 1/1000 of what it once was - Hooray America!

The analogy would be what are we now doing to try and bring the gun deaths down from the thousands to the few dozen negligible deaths where we can again say - Hooray America! So while you personally dont seem interested in TRYING anything further to improve on that number, other people are. And if that means that I as a gun owner have to put up with more inconveniences, I see it a reasonable tradeoff for our society to make.
118   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 11:14am  

Sniper says
When are you going to start protesting Flu deaths of innocent children? When do the protest marches start trying to ban the flu?

People do speak out against idiots who refuse to get the flu vaccine, and who refuse to take common sense measures to lower infection rates. Trump has been defunding the CDC. He appointed Fitzgerald to run the CDC, and she resigned in disgrace after revealing that she was trading tobacco stocks while in a position where she was supposed to be reducing smoking. The CDC remains under the direction of an interim director, as he has not found a new head. People are already speaking out against these things.

If the flu had a truly devastating year, people would be protesting Trump's impotence and negligence in regard to this post. As it turns out, we are having a banner year for multiple shootings, so people are speaking out and protesting against Trump and the rest of the swamp being bought and paid for by the NRA/Russia joint venture.
119   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 11:50am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
May Democracy prevail against Elite preference.


Amen. If only Democracy could overcome the $50MM+ in campaign donations from the NRA.
120   Goran_K   2018 Feb 20, 11:51am  

anon_8f378 says
Amen. If only Democracy could overcome the $50MM+ in campaign donations from the NRA.


The NRA is a private advocacy group of over 5 million citizens that gets $0 in Federal or State funding.

Seems like it's Democracy in action, not being overcome.
121   bob2356   2018 Feb 20, 11:57am  

anon_cf6c6 says

There are even some here that claim gun ownership in homes is down the last few decades.


No there aren't. The percentage of households with guns is down 40%. The guns per household has doubled. Less of the population owns guns but the ones that do own a lot more of them. Numbers matter.

Nice try sniper.
122   bob2356   2018 Feb 20, 12:02pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says

Which organization represents a mass movement, and a democratic membership, and which one represents a steering committee financed from wealthy foundations ?


Yes tell us which is financed by wealthy corporations and foundations. http://www.businessinsider.com/gun-industry-funds-nra-2013-1
That was 5 years ago. It's even more now.
123   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 20, 12:29pm  

The NRA doesn't have 5M members?

How many members does the Brady Campaign have?

Which is more representative of democratic impulses? If there is such a mass movement for Gun Control, where are their million member single issue organizations?

Tell me.
124   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:45pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Which is more representative of democratic impulses? If there is such a mass movement for Gun Control, where are their million member single issue organizations?

Tell me.


I think you'll see it soon enough. But, polling tells the story pretty well. There is very broad support for common sense gun control. The NRA and Republicans' intolerance of any reform is turning ordinary people against them. I can't believe they are so tone deaf.
125   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:45pm  

Goran_K says
The NRA is a private advocacy group of over 5 million citizens that gets $0 in Federal or State funding.

Seems like it's Democracy in action, not being overcome.


No, Democracy is 1 person, 1 vote. It's not $50MM to buy the entire House and Senate.
126   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:45pm  

Facts, Not Opinion, About the State of Guns in America

After every mass shooting event, before the blood even dries, the debates and arguments begin.

This article is nothing but a series of grouped facts which tell their own story.

________

A firearm is a nonliving piece of metal.

It takes the action of a living being to fire a firearm, purposefully or accidentally.

Criminals do not follow laws.

Newly created and potential future laws will be ignored by criminals.

People who are not criminals do follow laws.

There are state and federal laws making illicit drugs illegal.

60,000-65,000 people died from drug overdoses in 2016.

There are state and federal laws making drunk driving illegal.

From 2006-2016, over 10,000 people died every year from drunk driving crashes.

Murder is illegal. Mass shootings are murder.

_______

Gun free zones disarm only those who choose to follow laws.

Almost every school shooting in the past 20 years has occurred in a “gun free zone.”

Individuals intent on harming or killing others will use any weapon or object to do so.

Evil people do not care about laws or human life.

_______

The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791. It is part of the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights identifies pre-existing rights of all humans.

The Bill of Rights restricts the government from interfering with these rights.

The Bill of Rights does not grant any rights.

The Second Amendment protects the right to own firearms.

Repealing the Second Amendment would not remove the right to keep and bear arms.

Repealing the Second Amendment would only allow the government to violate the right to keep and bear arms.

_______

The first known “machine-gun” was patented in 1718.

The Puckle gun existed at the time of the writing of the Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment refers to “arms,” not limiting itself to covering any specific weapons or leaps of technology.

The First Amendment applies to all modern technologies including television, internet, and high-speed printing presses.

The Fourth Amendment covers modern technologies including cell phones and personal computers.

The Bill of Rights was not restricted to only technology that existed at the time of its writing.

_______

The national average for police response time is 11 minutes.

Every school has some teachers, school staff and administration officials present while in session.

School staffs are responsible for the safety of their students.

Almost all teachers and school staff in the United States are unarmed.

An unarmed individual stands little chance against an armed individual.

Many teachers have died while trying to protect students from active shooters.

_______

Semi-automatic weapons fire one round for every time the trigger is depressed.

Automatic weapons continuously fire while the trigger is depressed.

The functionality of an AR-15 and any standard semi-auto hunting rifle is the same.

AR-15’s are rifles with accessories to make them easier to operate. Most are black. Neither the accessories nor color make the rifle any deadlier.

The “AR” in AR-15 stands for “ARmalite,” the company that invented that style of rifle.

“AR” does not stand for “assault rifle.”

An “assault rifle” is a selective-fire weapon that can fire in both semi-automatic or automatic modes.

Most news reporters describe AR-15’s as “assault rifles.”

The caliber of an AR-15 is either .223 of an inch, or 5.56mm.

Bullets from an AR-15 are not the largest bullets.

A standard 9mm round is approximately 60 percent larger than a AR-15 round.

A standard hunting round (.308 or 30.06) is more than 30 percent larger than an AR-15 round.

Less than 400 people are killed per year by any kind of rifle, including the AR-15.

The National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 regulates fully automatic weapons, suppressors, shotguns, and other destructive devices such as bombs or grenades. A special license from the BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives) is required to manufacture or own any of these items.

_______

Background checks are required for all online firearm dealer purchases.

Background checks are required for all gun show dealer purchases.

Individuals selling private property to another individual who is a non-felon is legal.

Criminals stealing firearms do not go through background checks.

Criminals selling firearms to other criminals will not conduct background checks.

_______

There are 270-310 million firearms in the United States.

Approximately 40 percent of all U.S. households have a firearm.

Giving a liberal estimate of 13,000 firearm homicides per year, that is a 0.00004025 chance of being killed by a firearm. (1 in approximately 25,000 Americans).

40,200 people died in car accidents in 2016. (1 in approximately 8,000 Americans).

_______

The National Rifle Association is composed of 5 million+ Americans.

The NRA represents its membership.

The NRA does not receive government funding.

The NRA teaches gun safety for free in schools that will allow it.

_______

There are thousands of firearm laws and regulations at both state and federal level.

Before 1968, you could buy an AR-15 through the mail.

There was no background check system before 1993.

School shootings were a rare event until the 1990’s.

_______

These facts should have told you a story. You can ignore them and argue merely based on emotion, but that does nothing to change the facts, especially these last two:

Inanimate objects do not kill people intentionally.

People kill.

https://www.newsmax.com/johncylc/guns-firearms-second-amendment-parkland/2018/02/16/id/843820/
127   MrMagic   2018 Feb 20, 1:46pm  

bob2356 says
anon_cf6c6 says

There are even some here that claim gun ownership in homes is down the last few decades.


No there aren't. The percentage of households with guns is down 40%.


How much has the number of actual households risen in the last few decades?

oops..

Sniper says


Not these percentages again, some just haven't learned math.

In 1978 there were 73 million households, so 51% of 73 = 37 million were gun owners.

In 2016 there were 126 million households, so 36% of 126 = 45 million were gun owners.

Quick math question, which is larger, 37 million or 45 million?



Why do you IGNORE the rise in households over the decades. Oh that's right, it doesn't fit the twisted Liberal narrative from CBS and NYT in that chart.

Still think actual household gun ownership is down 40%?

Those pesky math facts again...
128   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:46pm  

bob2356 says
No there aren't. The percentage of households with guns is down 40%. The guns per household has doubled. Less of the population owns guns but the ones that do own a lot more of them. Numbers matter.


Down 40%??? Really??? This is YOUR chart below.

Numbers matter, somehow you don't understand them or can read a chart. Let's try for the THIRD time.

Sniper says


Not these percentages again, some just haven't learned math.

In 1978 there were 73 million households, so 51% of 73 = 37 million were gun owners.

In 2016 there were 126 million households, so 36% of 126 = 45 million were gun owners.

Quick math question, which is larger, 37 million or 45 million?

What was that again about "right wing math"?

More households own guns NOW.


So tell us, which number of households are bigger, 37 million or 45 million?

Still think it's down 40%.

bob2356 says
Numbers matter.


Apparently logic doesn't.
129   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:46pm  

bob2356 says
No there aren't. The percentage of households with guns is down 40%. The guns per household has doubled. Less of the population owns guns but the ones that do own a lot more of them. Numbers matter.


Down 40%??? Really??? This is YOUR chart below.

Numbers matter, somehow you don't understand them or can read a chart. Let's try for the THIRD time.

Sniper says


Not these percentages again, some just haven't learned math.

In 1978 there were 73 million households, so 51% of 73 = 37 million were gun owners.

In 2016 there were 126 million households, so 36% of 126 = 45 million were gun owners.

Quick math question, which is larger, 37 million or 45 million?

What was that again about "right wing math"?

More households own guns NOW.


So tell us, which number of households are bigger, 37 million or 45 million?

Still think it's down 40%.

bob2356 says
Numbers matter.


Apparently logic doesn't.
130   Goran_K   2018 Feb 20, 1:48pm  

bob2356 says
No there aren't. The percentage of households with guns is down 40%. The guns per household has doubled. Less of the population owns guns but the ones that do own a lot more of them. Numbers matter.

Nice try sniper.


Uh how would anyone even know this or get accurate information about this?

As a matter of fact and culture, gun owners aren't very open about what they have inside their home. Gun owners aren't going to be like, "Yeah I have guns inside my house. 17 exactly."

That sounds ridiculous.
131   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 1:54pm  

anon_cf6c6 says
Criminals do not follow laws.

Newly created and potential future laws will be ignored by criminals.

People who are not criminals do follow laws.


By this logic, we should get rid of all laws. Criminals don't follow them, after all.
132   Goran_K   2018 Feb 20, 1:55pm  

anon_8f378 says
By this logic, we should get rid of all laws. Criminals don't follow them, after all.


Uh no. That's not what people are saying.

You need to have laws that are calibrated to stop the problem WHILE also working to not deny people, who have done nothing wrong, their rights.

Hyperbole on either side is not useful or productive.
133   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 3:25pm  

anon_8f378 says
By this logic, we should get rid of all laws. Criminals don't follow them, after all.


By Liberal logic, if we just passed NEW laws, the criminals will follow them, even though they don't follow existing laws.
134   HappyGilmore   2018 Feb 20, 5:00pm  

Goran_K says
Uh no. That's not what people are saying.


I'm not sure to which people you refer, but the posters on here absolutely are saying that.

Goran_K says

You need to have laws that are calibrated to stop the problem WHILE also working to not deny people, who have done nothing wrong, their rights.

Hyperbole on either side is not useful or productive.


Yep, I agree. Unfortunately the NRA won't allow ANY laws to be passed that might affect the ability of someone to get a assault rifle--no matter if they are mentally ill, teenaged, whatever. I'm all for a rational discussion of facts, but that's very hard to find because one side desperately wants to avoid it.
135   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 7:44pm  

HappyGilmore says
Unfortunately the NRA won't allow ANY laws to be passed that might affect the ability of someone to get a assault rifle


Ahhh, the Chuck Schumer talking points. Nice.

HappyGilmore says
I'm all for a rational discussion of facts, but that's very hard to find because one side desperately wants to avoid it.


Exactly.

Stop watching CNN and you'll learn true facts, not FAKE hyperbole they spew all day long.
136   anonymous   2018 Feb 20, 8:50pm  

HappyGilmore says
I'm all for a rational discussion of facts,


« First        Comments 97 - 136 of 1,304       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions