patrick.net

joeyjojojunior says

Let's get a special prosecutor that can put this to bed!

Remember when Trump mentioned his judge may not be unbiased, and the MSM went crazy? Why do you think it's ok to question the system now?

You dont get to create special processes when things look like they arent going your way.

Regardless, a prosecution requires evidence. We currently have none.

joeyjojojunior says

lol---I'm the troll? If a simple google search would give me what I'm asking for--why haven't you or anyone else done it?

You want us to find evidence of no evidence? If you claim there is evidence, its your job to show your links. So far, you posted one misinterpreted quote from Comey wherein he says he is investigating Russia.

"You want us to find evidence of no evidence? If you claim there is evidence, its your job to show your links. So far, you posted one misinterpreted quote from Comey wherein he says he is investigating Russia."

Nope-I've never asked for that. I have shown the links and the quotes. I've shown links with some evidence. So, clearly evidence exists. You can call it untrustworthy if you like, but you can't claim that it doesn't exist.

joeyjojojunior says

Why wait 100+ days?

taking advice from your advisors is what a president does. Absolutely crazy to expect a president to walk in and fire the FBI director, w/o learning all the facts available to a president.

Also, Comey fucked up again and showed no signs of adjusting his behavior going forward.

Your timing narrative is a lie. Nothing there.

"Remember when Trump mentioned his judge may not be unbiased, and the MSM went crazy? Why do you think it's ok to question the system now? You dont get to create special processes when things look like they arent going your way. Regardless, a prosecution requires evidence. We currently have none."

Wow--you're losing it now. Trump claimed a judge was biased because of his family's race. People rightly were appalled.

I'm claiming that Republicans leading the investigation into a Republican President are inherently biased. Not even remotely the same thing.

And an investigation is what produces evidence that can be used much later if a prosecution is warranted. You need to learn the difference between investigation and prosecution.

"Your timing narrative is a lie. Nothing there."

All I've said is it's suspicious. That is most definitely not a lie. Let's investigate and you can prove me wrong.

I'd be happier if Trump had been open and honest about the reasons that he fired Comey. I'd be happier if those reasons had merit.
Instead, he and his 'team' hid in the bushes and told us a variety of stories on why he fired Comey. The reasons that he settled on were to contradictory to bother trying to summarize. You can read it here:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/transcript-donald-trump-nbc-news/

There's one thing he's right about. Neither he nor his team can come up with a reasonable explanation verbally, so they should stick to written words, and have a lawyer compose the statements. At least that way, they will make sense. OTOH, if he had competent people explaining the truth in the press conferences, there wouldn't be any problem. Unfortunately, that is too much to ask from the Trump administration.

joeyjojojunior says

Wow--you're losing it now. Trump claimed a judge was biased because of his family's race. People rightly were appalled.

I'm claiming that Republicans leading the investigation into a Republican President are inherently biased. Not even remotely the same thing.

Its exactly the same thing. Does the authority figure have a bias towards his own team or not? In trump's case, that judge was proven to have connections to La Raza. Trump was proven accurate in his claim.

Your hypocrisy is noted...again.

joeyjojojunior says

I'm claiming that Republicans leading the investigation into a Republican President are inherently biased. Not even remotely the same thing.

The FBI is not republican. Its the unbiased, non political FBI. If a director shows bias, get rid of him. If not, you're questioning the new FBI director's integrity w zero evidence. This is every bit as appalling as what Trump did to that Mexican judge.

EXCEPT Trump had good reasons to accuse that Judge, given the judge was a member of La Raza.

You dont even know who the new director is yet, and you are claiming bias. This is nothing short of a total meltdown.

Unless Trump nominates David Duke or Alex Jones, you have no right to demand input over who the prosecutor should be. To question the integrity of this honorable official yet-to-be-named should make rational people "appalled". Either you agree w me, or you are a hypocrite. Which is it?

joeyjojojunior says

Let's get a special prosecutor

joeyjojojunior says

You need to learn the difference between investigation and prosecution.

Um? who are you talking to? Neither is acceptable, tbc. Which of your fever dreams are we discussing? A special prosecutor, or a special investigation? Also, tell us what pattern of behavior the new head of FBI has shown to justify a special anything?

"EXCEPT Trump had good reasons to accuse that Judge, given the judge was a member of La Raza."

And it's clear where you get your news...

joeyjojojunior says

"EXCEPT Trump had good reasons to accuse that Judge, given the judge was a member of La Raza."

And it's clear where you get your news...

You consistently think you know things that you dont. Your trigger word seems to be "clear." Whenever you say something is "clear" you mean you have a clear fantasy in your head.

"Um? who are you talking to?"

Uh, you. A special prosecutor investigates and then prosecutes if evidence warrants. It's actually called a special counsel now so I should have used the new term.

"You consistently think you know things that you don't"

That's funny because it's you who are always making the declarations and me who is saying that things aren't black and white. You say there is no evidence. I say, actually there is some evidence but it may not be credible. We need to do more investigating.

You say they are NOT investigating Trump. I say--they are investigating Trump Administration and we don't really know for sure what they've found, so it's not right to say anything for certain.

All I'm saying is let's get to the bottom of this. What are you afraid of?

literally one quick google search, proving you are a troll https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2016/06/07/the-donald--the-la-raza-judge-n2174441

Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot.

Or -- explain why you feel its totes cool to question the honor of a US official?

Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.

"Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot."

Wow--an appalling bigot? Someone is triggered.

joeyjojojunior says

Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.

"Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot."

Wow--an appalling bigot? Someone is triggered.

Notice you can't address the facts, or make a choice. The cognitive dissonance you are experience should tell you something.

"Notice you can't address the facts, or make a choice"

What facts and what choice? wtf are you talking about?

CBOEtrader says

either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot.

Or -- explain why you feel its totes cool to question the honor of a US official?

Quigley says

Jojo, go get an education and come back when you're more informed and less stupid.

It's as if the past 7 months of Dems and their leaders bitching about Comey's role in the election just "POOF!" vanished.

"What criticism of Comey? Which Demorat Criticized Comey? Nobody Criticized Comey! Trump is Nuts!"

joeyjojojunior says

lol---I'm the troll? If a simple google search would give me what I'm asking for--why haven't you or anyone else done it?

Now you want us to do YOUR homework? Grow up noob!

CBOEtrader says

Remember when Trump mentioned his judge may not be unbiased, and the MSM went crazy? Why do you think it's ok to question the system now?

Good point.

joeyjojojunior says

Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.

So Trump didn't criticize the Judge who was a La Raza member and an Open Borders advocate for having bias?

They are accusing the new director of the FBI of bias before she's even been named.

What type of bigot would do such a thing?

Quigley says

Now you want us to do YOUR homework? Grow up noob!

No, I want you to back up what you say on here like I do. All you do is make nonsense statements.

Lashkar_i_Trumpi says

If you have problems with the accuracy of the before and after quotes I posted directly from ABC News, go complain to the editor.

What after quotes?? You have posted absolutely ZERO after quotes.

Yes, all the Dems thought Comey did a bad job on the Clinton investigation. So what? Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.

There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position. For you to imply such is a bold faced lie.

CBOEtrader says

They are accusing the new director of the FBI of bias before she's even been named.

What type of bigot would do such a thing?

Who is? Source?

joeyjojojunior says

Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.

You'll know the name of this special counsel when trump taps a new FBI director.

joeyjojojunior says

There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHAHHAH

And surprise, surprise. Republican Congressmen are saying nobody assured Trump he was in the clear

https://www.yahoo.com/news/told-trump-clear-not-us-key-senators-say-202928995.html

“Sen. Grassley has not spoken to President Trump about what he has learned in briefings related to investigations into Russian interference in our elections, and he has never referred to the notion of collusion as a ‘hoax,’ Grassley’s spokesman, Taylor Foy, emailed Yahoo News.

CBOEtrader says

joeyjojojunior says

There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHAHHAH

Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.

joeyjojojunior says

Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.

See jojo, thats not your job. You cant usurp the director of the fbi just cause you want to, especially w zero evidence.

To suggest the FBI would be biased is bigoted. You are either a bigot or a hypocrite.

CBOEtrader says

See jojo, thats not your job. You cant usurp the director of the fbi just cause you want to, especially w zero evidence.

To suggest the FBI would be biased is bigoted. You are either a bigot or a hypocrite.

Of course it's not my job. It is the job of Congress, however.

To appoint a special counsel to GET the evidence.

And I'm not sure you know what the word bigot means. You are clearly misusing it.

joeyjojojunior says

Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.

Intellect isnt yours.

Team Hillary hatched this narrative as soon she lost. Try finding Russia/Trump stories before election night. Notice how this story hit all at once as soon as hillary lost?

Its all made up dude. Zero evidence. 154 comments in and you, nor anyone else, has shared any evidence what-so-ever.

Have a stronger mind. Dont let your overlords lie to you so easily.

joeyjojojunior says

And I'm not sure you know what the word bigot means.

Was trump a bigot for questioning a la raza judge's bias?

You are questioning the new FBI director of bias for no reason. You must be an Uber-Bigot. ^^ this is dem logic. Or-- and we can try this again-- explain why you feel entitled to judge the director of our FBI w/o even knowing who it is.

CBOEtrader says

Try finding Russia/Trump stories before election night. Notice how this story hit all at once as soon as hillary lost?

Is that a joke? The FBI investigation into Trump/Russia connections began in the summer of 2016. The dossier was circulated in October. The story was around from well before the election.

Your lies are getting worse and worse.

CBOEtrader says

Was trump a bigot for questioning a la raza judge's bias?

No, just an idiot.

This guy is fucking hopeless...

joeyjojojunior says

Your lies are getting worse and worse.

You dont even care about evidence do you?

The dossier and the other discredited anonymous sources are all garbage. This was the weak support used to surveil Trump. The blasting MSM narrative didnt start until Hillary lost. This makes sense, considering there is no actual evidence to surveil trump, it looks like team hillary working in cooperation w Obamas team tried to hack the election. There is far more evidence for this theory than for Trump/Russia hacking the election.

Hillary needed a cover, and they spun this nonsense Trump/Russia narrative which the MSM was all too happy to blast into your soft skull.

Again, there is far more evidence for this theory than for Trump/Russia collusion. Hopefully Trump's new FBI director re-opens Hillary's investigation, and starts one on the Obama administration for its role in surveilling political rivals.

joeyjojojunior says

CBOEtrader says

Was trump a bigot for questioning a la raza judge's bias?

No, just an idiot.

OK, and what does that make you for questioning the integrity of the new FBI director?