invite response« First « Previous Comments 129 - 158 of 158 Search these comments
"EXCEPT Trump had good reasons to accuse that Judge, given the judge was a member of La Raza."
And it's clear where you get your news...
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 11:36am
"EXCEPT Trump had good reasons to accuse that Judge, given the judge was a member of La Raza."
And it's clear where you get your news...
You consistently think you know things that you dont. Your trigger word seems to be "clear." Whenever you say something is "clear" you mean you have a clear fantasy in your head.
"Um? who are you talking to?"
Uh, you. A special prosecutor investigates and then prosecutes if evidence warrants. It's actually called a special counsel now so I should have used the new term.
"You consistently think you know things that you don't"
That's funny because it's you who are always making the declarations and me who is saying that things aren't black and white. You say there is no evidence. I say, actually there is some evidence but it may not be credible. We need to do more investigating.
You say they are NOT investigating Trump. I say--they are investigating Trump Administration and we don't really know for sure what they've found, so it's not right to say anything for certain.
All I'm saying is let's get to the bottom of this. What are you afraid of?
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 11:40am
literally one quick google search, proving you are a troll https://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2016/06/07/the-donald--the-la-raza-judge-n2174441
Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot.
Or -- explain why you feel its totes cool to question the honor of a US official?
Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.
"Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot."
Wow--an appalling bigot? Someone is triggered.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 12:24pm
Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.
"Regardless, either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot."
Wow--an appalling bigot? Someone is triggered.
Notice you can't address the facts, or make a choice. The cognitive dissonance you are experience should tell you something.
"Notice you can't address the facts, or make a choice"
What facts and what choice? wtf are you talking about?
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 2:00pm
either you accept the integrity of trump's new head of fbi choice, or you are an appalling bigot.
Or -- explain why you feel its totes cool to question the honor of a US official?
MisdemeanorRebel
2017 May 12, 2:30pm
Jojo, go get an education and come back when you're more informed and less stupid.
It's as if the past 7 months of Dems and their leaders bitching about Comey's role in the election just "POOF!" vanished.
"What criticism of Comey? Which Demorat Criticized Comey? Nobody Criticized Comey! Trump is Nuts!"
Shaman
2017 May 12, 3:04pm
lol---I'm the troll? If a simple google search would give me what I'm asking for--why haven't you or anyone else done it?
Now you want us to do YOUR homework? Grow up noob!
MisdemeanorRebel
2017 May 12, 3:26pm
Remember when Trump mentioned his judge may not be unbiased, and the MSM went crazy? Why do you think it's ok to question the system now?
Good point.
MisdemeanorRebel
2017 May 12, 3:27pm
Like I said--you get your news from Pat Buchanan. That was my point.
So Trump didn't criticize the Judge who was a La Raza member and an Open Borders advocate for having bias?
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 3:31pm
They are accusing the new director of the FBI of bias before she's even been named.
What type of bigot would do such a thing?
Now you want us to do YOUR homework? Grow up noob!
No, I want you to back up what you say on here like I do. All you do is make nonsense statements.
If you have problems with the accuracy of the before and after quotes I posted directly from ABC News, go complain to the editor.
What after quotes?? You have posted absolutely ZERO after quotes.
Yes, all the Dems thought Comey did a bad job on the Clinton investigation. So what? Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.
There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position. For you to imply such is a bold faced lie.
They are accusing the new director of the FBI of bias before she's even been named.
What type of bigot would do such a thing?
Who is? Source?
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 3:59pm
Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.
You'll know the name of this special counsel when trump taps a new FBI director.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 4:00pm
There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHAHHAH
And surprise, surprise. Republican Congressmen are saying nobody assured Trump he was in the clear
https://www.yahoo.com/news/told-trump-clear-not-us-key-senators-say-202928995.html
“Sen. Grassley has not spoken to President Trump about what he has learned in briefings related to investigations into Russian interference in our elections, and he has never referred to the notion of collusion as a ‘hoax,’ Grassley’s spokesman, Taylor Foy, emailed Yahoo News.
There is absolutely NOTHING hypocritical or inconsistent in the Dems position.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHAHHAH
Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 4:03pm
Dems are asking for a special counsel to investigate if Trump fired him because he was worried about the FBI investigation.
See jojo, thats not your job. You cant usurp the director of the fbi just cause you want to, especially w zero evidence.
To suggest the FBI would be biased is bigoted. You are either a bigot or a hypocrite.
See jojo, thats not your job. You cant usurp the director of the fbi just cause you want to, especially w zero evidence.
To suggest the FBI would be biased is bigoted. You are either a bigot or a hypocrite.
Of course it's not my job. It is the job of Congress, however.
To appoint a special counsel to GET the evidence.
And I'm not sure you know what the word bigot means. You are clearly misusing it.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 4:06pm
Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.
Intellect isnt yours.
Team Hillary hatched this narrative as soon she lost. Try finding Russia/Trump stories before election night. Notice how this story hit all at once as soon as hillary lost?
Its all made up dude. Zero evidence. 154 comments in and you, nor anyone else, has shared any evidence what-so-ever.
Have a stronger mind. Dont let your overlords lie to you so easily.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 12, 4:09pm
And I'm not sure you know what the word bigot means.
Was trump a bigot for questioning a la raza judge's bias?
You are questioning the new FBI director of bias for no reason. You must be an Uber-Bigot. ^^ this is dem logic. Or-- and we can try this again-- explain why you feel entitled to judge the director of our FBI w/o even knowing who it is.
Try finding Russia/Trump stories before election night. Notice how this story hit all at once as soon as hillary lost?
Is that a joke? The FBI investigation into Trump/Russia connections began in the summer of 2016. The dossier was circulated in October. The story was around from well before the election.
Your lies are getting worse and worse.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 13, 4:11am
Your lies are getting worse and worse.
You dont even care about evidence do you?
The dossier and the other discredited anonymous sources are all garbage. This was the weak support used to surveil Trump. The blasting MSM narrative didnt start until Hillary lost. This makes sense, considering there is no actual evidence to surveil trump, it looks like team hillary working in cooperation w Obamas team tried to hack the election. There is far more evidence for this theory than for Trump/Russia hacking the election.
Hillary needed a cover, and they spun this nonsense Trump/Russia narrative which the MSM was all too happy to blast into your soft skull.
Again, there is far more evidence for this theory than for Trump/Russia collusion. Hopefully Trump's new FBI director re-opens Hillary's investigation, and starts one on the Obama administration for its role in surveilling political rivals.
CBOEtrader
2017 May 13, 4:13am
Was trump a bigot for questioning a la raza judge's bias?
No, just an idiot.
OK, and what does that make you for questioning the integrity of the new FBI director?
« First « Previous Comments 129 - 158 of 158 Search these comments
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/10/maxine_waters_i_dont_support_trump_firing_comey_i_would_support_hillary_clinton_firing_comey.html
Just watch the video. Oy Vey.