patrick.net

It is also not mentioned that many of the 53% of women who voted for Trump may have a goo man (or men if you count sons, dads, etc.) in their lives and do not agree with demonizing them as has become a fad amongst many alt left feminists. Hillary seemed to exemplify extreme feminism with her "I'm with her slogan" and belief that anyone with a vagina was required to vote for her because she had one also. Huff Post either ignores or misses that.

What? She says she put up with it because that was easier than accusing a powerful man? Bullshit. She definitely wanted it. I've been reading PatNet for long enough to know that all labia and clits become swollen, wet, and achey around rich guys. Evolution.

HEY YOU says

“I encountered all kinds of sexism,” Conway tells Cosmo’s Kristen Mascia in a story published on Tuesday. “The most extreme examples were unwanted sexual advances. "

If she means "harassment" she should say "harassment".
"unwanted sexual advances" sounds like.. yeah... Women need to spend time turning down men they don't like. I feel so sorry for them having to do that.

in any case it doesn't sound like sexism.

Why Did White Women Vote For Trump?

Two words: bad boys. Women are shit stupid when it comes to bad boys. Always have been. Probably always will be. It's instinctual. They cannot override their instincts. Trump is an unapologetic bad boy and that makes him attractive to white women regardless of how moronic or crude that pig is.

Women are the worst hypocrites on this planet. They secretly LOVE sexual advances (even if unwanted) from any alpha/powerful male, but then publicly spout how much they hate it and call it sexual harassment because it's a way to brag without overtly bragging. I've seen this first hand over and over...it's total bragging rights under the auspices of harassment.

They never seem to complain about the advances when they are rotating on the plywood pillory!

Their screams just make them tighter!

http://komonews.com/news/local/court-documents-i-am-a-serial-killer-woman-announces

LYNNWOOD, Wash. (KOMO)- A woman who met a man through a Craigslist ad announced that she was a serial killer and began stabbing him in a Lynnwood motel, court documents say.

The man managed to escape. Police found and arrested the 24-year-old woman, who is from Edmonds. She told police that she wanted to be a serial killer. She had written a note to leave on the man's body, saying that she planned to kill again, court documents say.

She also told police she also planned to eat the man's heart, court documents say.

The woman was jailed. The man, 29, of Lynnwood, is in satisfactory condition at Harborview Medical Center.

Police were alerted to this incident Sunday night. The man had escaped to a Lynnwood Walgreen's. He was suffering from stab wounds.

He told police that he met the woman through a Craigslist ad, and the two went to a room in the Rodeo Inn in Lynnwood.

He told police that she asked him several times if he were a serial killer. He said he wasn't.

The woman then climbed on top of him and said, "Well, I'm a serial killer." She grabbed a pocket knife and stabbed him.

He struggled and escapes.

Court documents say the woman seemed emotionless when discussing her plans to kill the man and that at one point seemed more concerned about missing work than facing criminal charges.

When an officer asked her what had happened, she said, "I'm a loon," according to court documents.

She has not yet been charged.

A judge ordered her held on $1 million bail on Tuesday.

I wanna see what that crazy bitch looks like. Did he get to fuck her first or did she stab him right away?

YesYNot says

If a woman puts up with unwanted sexual advances to be able to work in a profession, that is not consent.

How do you know in advance that a sexual advance will be unwanted? Is there a mind reader app for smartphones, point at a chick and be like "Siri, does this chick think I'm hot or not?" and it tells you?

Unless it's repeated from the same person despite clear notice for it to stop - say 3 times, there should be no such thing.

YesYNot says

Flirt a little and see if it is reciprocated. Where Trump went wrong was admitting to skipping this step and going right to the pussy grabbing.

That's a ridiculous answer. You can flirt and the girl can tease you and still say no. That still qualifies as "unwanted sexual advances".
How is that unethical?

I think you have spoiled women acting like advances are really suuuch a bother, and men should be mind readers. Just having to turn down men means their career can't progress, you know.

In reality of course, having something men want is clearly an advantage. It is something that gets converted all the time into very practical privileges, whether on the way women are treated, or the standard of living they enjoy, etc...

YesYNot says

Flirt a little and see if it is reciprocated. Where Trump went wrong was admitting to skipping this step and going right to the pussy grabbing.

No, he said "When you're famous, THEY let you grab the pussy" which indicates consent.

For the rest, I answered this by stating it should be required that the advances be repeated in the face of a clearly communicated desire not to be the recipient.

And Heraclitusstudent has answered the rest.

Heraclitusstudent says

In reality of course, having something men want is clearly an advantage. It is something that gets converted all the time into very practical privileges, whether on the way women are treated, or the standard of living they enjoy, etc...

A great part of feminism is manly or plain or socially awkward women jealous that other women benefit from their charisma/appearance at work and elsewhere.

Well, you have the pretty ones that protest that they get too much unwanted attention (even though they spend hours in front of the mirror making themselves look awesome), and then those that suffer from not getting enough and protesting how negative comments about their looks traumatized them (even though they should feel freed from not having to care).
In both cases they agree on blaming men.

T L Lipsovich says

I wanna see what that crazy bitch looks like. Did he get to fuck her first or did she stab him right away?

The article implies that she tried to stab him right away. I'm assuming that there is no picture of her because according to the article She has not yet been charged. Of course if it were a man doing this he would have been charged and his picture would be readily available. I'll have to monitor SmokingGun to see if they post her picture at some point.

Women can only be spaz serial killers. Another symptom of gender inferiority.

Heraclitusstudent says

That's a ridiculous answer. You can flirt and the girl can tease you and still say no. That still qualifies as "unwanted sexual advances".

How is that unethical?

It's not. That's all normal behavior. I think unwanted sexual advances are common and not a problem. Unwanted kissing and groping are a problem, IMO. The question is whether or not the latter were common in the 90s.

T L Lipsovich says

No, he said "When you're famous, THEY let you grab the pussy" which indicates consent.

We've already had this discussion. I think his comments were vague. Some will read that 'let you do it' as consent. Others will read it as let you get away with it as in not call a lawyer, but be pissed off. Anyway, I shouldn't have brought Trump into it, b/c that's not what the OP was about.

Wait, now. Should I be a gentleman? Nahhhhhhhhhhh, grope grope.

zzyzzx says

The article implies that she tried to stab him right away. I'm assuming that there is no picture of her because according to the article She has not yet been charged. Of course if it were a man doing this he would have been charged and his picture would be readily available. I'll have to monitor SmokingGun to see if they post her picture at some point.

Right on.

Her name is Amy Caroline Brown, pretty sure about the first and last but not middle. Couldn't find any pics.

Curious to see how crazy she looks.

YesYNot says

IMO, more discussion about what is / isn't permissible ahead of time would lead to less problems. That's why corps and schools are moving toward that model.

As long as it doesn't create an industry of consultants who profit by discussing it... oh wait.

T L Lipsovich says

As long as it doesn't create an industry of consultants who profit by discussing it... oh wait.