patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,198,929 comments by 14,158 users - desertguy, ForcedTQ, Patrick, PeopleUnited, stereotomy online now
Rin's corroboration with a female ex-classmate
invite response
2014 Sep 16, 3:24am 56,073 views 218 comments
« First « Previous Comments 140 - 179 of 218 Next » Last » Search these comments
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 11:13am
a.k.a a moniker for the basket case Canadian
Rin, perhaps you should write a screenplay, About a Boat, a Canadian Story to explore this area. :-)
No need to write anything, just listen to Alanis Morrisette's "Jagged Little Pill", you know, one of the most commercially successful rocks CD of the 90s, alongside Metallica & Nirvana, and you'll get the picture.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 11:18am
"Jagged Little Pill"
Just skip over 'Head Over Feet' on the CD because she actually admitted that she needed help and support in that one, and then, respected the person who gave it to her.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 12:07pm
Many women in the US are victims of unrealistic expectations.
Are you sure?
Here's a Sugar Baby article about the scene in the USA ...
Apparently, these rich, investment banking guys haven't gotten my memo ... women in America aren't worth dating.
If co-eds at Princeton, Columbia, & NYU are expecting a guy to put 'em on an expense account, then it's clear that there's something wrong with our society.
I would never hand a fortune over to any of these American skanks. They should have a steady BF in college, instead of trolling for bankers.
Ceffer
2014 Sep 21, 12:28pm
It's unrealistic for a man to expect himself to be able to get pregnant, carry the baby to term and nurse the baby
I live in California, where they think, "there's no harm in trying."
Apparently, these rich, investment banking guys haven't gotten my memo ... women in America aren't worth dating.
For some men, it's is less expensive in terms of time to have the limo pick up a sugar baby locally than to drive from NYC to Montreal himself.
If co-eds at Princeton, Columbia, & NYU are expecting a guy to put 'em on an expense account, then it's clear that there's something wrong with our society.
These are undergrads. Undergraduate programs at these top universities are usually taught by graduate students. The kids are there often because the universities have good financial aid.
I would never hand a fortune over to any of these American skanks. They should have a steady BF in college, instead of trolling for bankers.
Undergrad programs for women have a long history of MRS degrees. With dwindling prospect for male college graduates, it is not a bad idea for the coeds to broaden their MRS degree to include older men who already are established instead of merely prospects. Women are simply turned on by successful men, just like we men are turned on by young/skinny/healthy girls.
The really dumb ones are the ones making a job out of being a sugar baby and keeping a BF at the same time as her little project; likely losing both men in the long run, or even worse: getting pregnant with the project.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 12:48pm
Apparently, these rich, investment banking guys haven't gotten my memo ... women in America aren't worth dating.
For some men, it's is less expensive in terms of time to have the limo pick up a sugar baby locally than to drive from NYC to Montreal himself.
Legally speaking, these American women need to be put on a monthly expense account, for it to be legal. That monthly stipend can range, from $2K to $20K per month.
A plane flight from NYC to Montreal, flight time around 45 mins, costs some $400.
Sure, if it were mid-week, it wouldn't be possible. But Thurs night, forget about it, I'd fly to Montreal for a legal bo*nk.
If co-eds at Princeton, Columbia, & NYU are expecting a guy to put 'em on an expense account, then it's clear that there's something wrong with our society.
These are undergrads. Undergraduate programs at these top universities are usually taught by graduate students. The kids are there often because the universities have good financial aid.
The point is that these are top tier universities. Traditionally speaking, these persons aren't suppose to be hoes, for NYC investment bankers. They should instead, be recruited by the Fortune 1000.
Legally speaking, these American women need to be put on a monthly expense account, for to be legal. That monthly stipend can range, from $2K to $20K per month.
A plane flight from NYC to Montreal, flight time around 45 mins, costs some $400.
Sure, if it were mid-week, it wouldn't be possible. But Thurs night, forget about it, I'd fly to Montreal for a legal bo*nk.
Some people may be fine with spending a day or two's time in order to get an hour or two from a pro. Others prefer having the non-pro coming to them, to stay the evening and decorate the penthouse apartment. There is nothing illegal about paying people to decorate private penthouse late at night and stay overnight. LOL.
The point is that these are top tier universities. Traditionally speaking, these persons aren't suppose to be hoes, for NYC investment bankers. They should instead, be recruited by the Fortune 1000.
There are far more graduates churned out by universities like that than what the Fortune 1000 recruit every year. Besides, who's to say, the girl is not getting an advanced interview from a hedge fund manager? Who wants to be a junior staff member at Fortune 1000 when you can be the girlfriend of a future Sergei Brin and get a fast track to head a future google glass or a future CEO of a future Yahoo? How much are you willing to pay to get a few hours face time with a potential serious investor? For the pretty young lady, her inheritance is her youthful body, which may well be worth more than your entire vestment in your hedge fund, if she plays her cards right and find the right investor to buy her out. LOL. It beats the heck out bouncing along a bunch of concussion damaged football player cocks.
It also makes sense from the executive's point of view: if I'm going to put some crony in charge that I can trust, I might as well put in place someone I know, intimately!
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 1:21pm
Some people may be fine with spending a day or two's time in order to get an hour or two from a pro. Others prefer having the non-pro coming to them, to stay the evening and decorate the penthouse apartment. There is nothing illegal about paying people to decorate private penthouse late at night and stay overnight. LOL.
Considering that outside this one particular country, the USA, it's legal, means that these execs are overpaying, for a personal assistant.
There are far more graduates churned out by universities like that than what the Fortune 1000 recruit every year. Besides, who's to say, the girl is not getting an advanced interview from a hedge fund manager? Who wants to be a junior staff member at Fortune 1000 when you can be the girlfriend of a future Sergei Brin and get a fast track to head a future google glass or a future CEO of a future Yahoo? How much are you willing to pay to get a few hours face time with a potential serious investor? For the pretty young lady, her inheritance is her youthful body, which may well be worth more than your entire vestment in your hedge fund, if she plays her cards right and find the right investor to buy her out. LOL. It beats the heck out bouncing along a bunch of concussion damaged football player cocks.
It also makes sense from the executive's point of view: if I'm going to put some crony in charge that I can trust, I might as well put in place someone I know, intimately!
I have no problems with what ppl want to do in their private time.
The thing is that a junior staff member, does not earn the rate of a typical NYC/Boston esc*rt. They earn a rate, comparable to a senior secretary, or a mid-level research analyst.
If an executive in the work world can't separate his bo*nking needs with the need to staff a dept or program, then he's ripe for a sex scandal and future admonitions from the partners.
Sure, some bozos fall for this but in the end, they get blackmailed and so-forth.
A flight from either Boston or NYC, is merely a few hundred bucks and usually, less than an hour. Afterwards, you can bang cuties from the Univ of Montreal, McGill, or some other school, w/o any of those headaches. Afterwards, everything stays in Montreal.
Considering that outside this one particular country, the USA, it's legal, means that these execs are overpaying, for a personal assistant.
Considering that these same execs do not intend to expatriate themselves, hiring a personal assistant locally is just like hiring a baby sitter in the US: probably costing more than in India. However, it's just part and parcel of living in the US.
I have no problems with what ppl want to do in their private time.
The thing is that a junior staff member, does not earn the rate of a typical NYC/Boston esc*rt. They earn a rate, comparable to a senior secretary, or a mid-level research analyst.
If an executive in the work world can't separate his bo*nking needs with the need to staff a dept or program, then he's ripe for a sex scandal and future admonitions from the partners.
Sure, some bozos fall for this but in the end, they get blackmailed and so-forth.
A flight from either Boston or NYC, is merely a few hundred bucks and usually, less than an hour. Afterwards, you can bang cuties from the Univ of Montreal, McGill, or some other school, w/o any of those headaches. Afterwards, everything stays in Montreal.
Okay, when you are a Billionaire, that means at 10% average business return, your annual return is 100mil just for sitting there. That is some $300k per day, or $20k every waking hour of your time. Why spend the time flying anywhere? Why spend that time boinking someone who has no potential more than just a bang that any mere middle class can also bang for a couple hundred bucks? I would want to be well rested in my own bed in my own house, and banging someone whom I'm also interviewing for better potentials. I want to bang someone who will one day top the list of female CEO in the US or the most influential women in the US, thanks to my talent discovery! Oh yeah, it would be even better if she brings the baby to her corner office while functioning as the CEO, my baby!
BTW, if you are fine with UMO and McGill coeds free-lancing for a couple hundred bucks an hour, why are you so upset at NYU coeds shooting for bigger prizes?
What I find laughable are all the miserable and married men out there.
Yes, it helps to know there's someone more miserable than oneself.
The problem is that some of these fellas, used to be old friends.
I would have preferred that they'd stayed single and then, we could haven taken regular road trips to Montreal, and have regular stag parties with a few esc*rts.
By Monday morning, we'd all be back to work, being productive citizens again.
Would you prefer they'd have stayed single?
Or would you honestly rather you had shackled up with some broad yourself
Reading all your posts on the matter, your ideas on the subject sound new. It sounds more like you lived your first three decades on this planet, with a wildly different set of expectations
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 1:54pm
BTW, if you are fine with UMO and McGill coeds free-lancing for a couple hundred bucks an hour, why are you so upset at NYU coeds shooting for bigger prizes?
I'm not upset, it's that these fellas (NYC, Boston, or other NE corridor cities), if they're earning north of $1M/yr, are getting ripped off by Team USA. They don't know how to valuate what a female companion brings to them. It's that Puritanism, dictates that value, not business.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 1:57pm
Would you prefer they'd have stayed single?
If they'd stayed single, we could have formed a brat pack, up in Montreal, boning away, month after month.
Between the bo*nking sessions with esc*rts, it would have been card games, rock climbing, discussing political science/history, camping, and all the other stuff which guys like to indulge in, w/o women messing it up.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 2:00pm
and banging someone whom I'm also interviewing for better potentials. I want to bang someone who will one day top the list of female CEO in the US or the most influential women in the US, thanks to my talent discovery! Oh yeah, it would be even better if she brings the baby to her corner office while functioning as the CEO, my baby!
In other words ... allow a snake into your own home to one day, put the knife into your own back.
BTW, if you are fine with UMO and McGill coeds free-lancing for a couple hundred bucks an hour, why are you so upset at NYU coeds shooting for bigger prizes?
I'm not upset, it's that these fellas (NYC, Boston, or other NE corridor cities), if they're earning north of $1M/yr, are getting ripped off by Team USA. They don't know how to valuate what a female companion brings to them. It's that Puritanism, dictates that value, not business.
Location imparts value on the goods. That's why a quarter pound corn dog sold by a street vendor in NYC costs more than a bushel (60lbs) of corn in Iowa. Farm gate price vs. market price are two different values; otherwise, nobody would be transporting any produce from the farm gate to the market.
and banging someone whom I'm also interviewing for better potentials. I want to bang someone who will one day top the list of female CEO in the US or the most influential women in the US, thanks to my talent discovery! Oh yeah, it would be even better if she brings the baby to her corner office while functioning as the CEO, my baby!
In other words ... allow a snake into your own home to one day, put the knife into your own back.
Well, Marissa Mayor has not back stabbed Sergey Brin yet; the Google Glass project is still running fine. In any case, if you truly believe "all women are like that," then you have to deal with the "snakes" somehow if you want to reproduce. It's better to pass the cost off to the shareholders' in order to give the women some kind of long term support instead of marrying them and making them into your own personal responsibility under current unfavorable family laws.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 2:40pm
Location imparts value on the goods. That's why a corn dog sold by a street vendor in NYC costs more than a bushel of corn in Iowa. Farm gate price vs. market price are two different values; otherwise, nobody would be transporting any produce from the farm gate to the market.
NYC's true value (a.k.a money shuffler) is a complete illusion, we all know that. At least Iowa is producing a 1/3 of the world's corn produce.
With that in mind, those rotten b*tches, hanging out in lower Manhattan, are clearly fishing for a banker. Knowing that, if someone in finance simply takes a one hour flight, out of *delusion central*, and onto Montreal, their prospects for a great time, increase 2 to 3 fold, at a very manageable cost.
And for others, a 3 hour flight to the Caribbean or Central America, can do the same thing.
So what's the value of an NYU student esc*rt? Besides taking her to the Met? Or some fancy gala in the Big Apple, while talking BS to a bunch of socialites? Very little else.
You see, these fellas don't get this. These local private college gals are pernicious and will create scandal, just to garner something for themselves.
Instead, like me, these guys need to divest from American skanks, and move onto the world of international courtesans.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 2:42pm
Marissa Mayor has not back stabbed Sergey Brin yet
Brin's worth billions, not millions. In that case, only time will tell.
If I were him, I would have stopped dating stateside immediately, and created a bevy of mistresses in Brazil, Montreal, Australia, Thailand, and Japan.
Robber Baron Elite Scum
2014 Sep 21, 2:45pm
If I were him, I would have stopped dating stateside immediately, and created a bevy of mistresses in Brazil, Montreal, Australia, Thailand, and Japan.
Ditto!
Just take private jet to any of those countries.
You can sleep on the king sized bed in your Private Jet until you arrive.
Robber Baron Elite Scum
2014 Sep 21, 2:46pm
Instead, like me, these guys need to divest from American skanks, and move onto the world of international courtesans.
Now you're talking language.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 2:46pm
If I were him, I would have stopped dating stateside immediately, and created a bevy of mistresses in Brazil, Montreal, Australia, Thailand, and Japan.
Ditto!
Just take private jet to any of those countries.
You can sleep on the king sized bed in your Private Jet until you arrive.
Finally, for the first time, we're on the same page.
Rin and Scum,
General Aviation (i.e. private aircraft) is some 50 times more dangerous than commercial airlines, in terms of crash fatality per mile . . . and something like 10-20 times the danger of driving a car on public highways, per mile of travel. Frequent flights to Caribean and Montreal (or even Far East and Oceania) would log up those miles very quickly, not mention the cost of keeping private jets that have ranges that reach the Far East and Oceania.
New Renter
2014 Sep 21, 2:59pm
If I were him, I would have stopped dating stateside immediately, and created a bevy of mistresses in Brazil, Montreal, Australia, Thailand, and Japan.
Ditto!
Just take private jet to any of those countries.
You can sleep on the king sized bed in your Private Jet until you arrive.
Finally, for the first time, we're on the same page.
Oh sweet Jesus, the end times have come!
Peter P
2014 Sep 21, 3:04pm
General Aviation (i.e. private aircraft) is some 50 times more dangerous than commercial airlines, in terms of crash fatality per mile
Rubbish! FAR 25 turbine aircrafts flown by two professional pilots operated under Part 91 have comparable safety statistics as Part 121 airlines.
Don't you lump that Piper Cub with a Global 6000.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 3:15pm
Rin and Scum,
General Aviation (i.e. private aircraft) is some 50 times more dangerous than commercial airlines, in terms of crash fatality per mile . . . and something like 10-20 times the danger of driving a car on public highways, per mile of travel. Frequent flights to Caribean and Montreal (or even Far East and Oceania) would log up those miles very quickly, not mention the cost of keeping private jets that have ranges that reach the Far East and Oceania.
You're worried about chartering jets?
You can simply book a business class flight (or even coach) to Montreal, at very little cost, esp for a banker type.
You've really missed the point of this discussion, a flight between any NE city, from DC to Boston, towards Montreal, costs every little, against the budget of a rainmaker in finance services.
The end result is that you land in a first world nation's city, with adult entertainment venues, which is completely underworld in the US.
Thus, you don't take your Sugar Baby to some *stall*, but to a fine restaurant or hotel/lounge, and then, can take her up to the room for a nice bo*nk. There are no policing activities to restrict these activities.
Afterwards, she goes back to her life and you go back to that airport, for that flight home to NYC or Boston.
LOL, now we are talking about using aircrafts that cost upwards of multiple $100k a day to operate, in order to save a few hundred dollars? i.e. the girl only costs 1/1000 the aircraft daily operating cost. I mean, seriously, how many dicks do you have that have to be satisfied to make it economical??
Location imparts value on the goods; i.e. locational value is part of the goods' value.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 3:19pm
LOL, now we are talking about using aircrafts that cost upwards of multiple $100k a day to operate, in order to save a few hundred dollars? i.e. the girl only costs 1/1000 the aircraft daily operating cost. I mean, seriously, how many dicks do you have that have to be satisfied to make it economical??
Location imparts value on the goods; i.e. locational value is part of the goods' value.
For one hour, I don't mind flying coach to Montreal.
Peter P
2014 Sep 21, 3:21pm
http://www.nbaa.org/ops/safety/stats/
As you can see, Airlines and Corporate/Executive have very similar numbers.
Rin,
There is nothing illegal in the US about taking a woman to a restaurant and paying her time for the restaurant. Everything is quite legal once you are willing to wine/dine/entertain her in addition to boinking her. Only cash for boinking is illegal.
There is no need to make those travel arrangements or dealing with the hassle of travel or sleeping in someone else' bed.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 3:31pm
There is nothing illegal in the US about taking a woman to a restaurant and paying her time for the restaurant. Everything is quite legal once you are willing to wine/dine/entertain her in addition to boinking her
What that is, is a faux relationship in the USA.
When I'm up in the Great White North, I only pay for companionship for a period of time, which complies with the law of not *advertising* for the sake of a bo*nk.
In contrast, the USA vice squad/sting ops crew, gets ppl to invoke these sort of time dimensions, with the supposition that the intent, was the bo*nk. Thus, in order to completely avoid these sanctions, one must pay completely, for a relationship.
Thus, many of these American Sugar Babies are paid monthly, just to stick around the bankers, for the occasional bo*nk.
That's how the laws are evaded.
Ceffer
2014 Sep 21, 4:14pm
Since we are talking commodities here, how come there are no charts about the twat/dollar ratios/efficiencies and twat futures.
There must be an open exchange where twats can be traded like pork loins.
What about twat derivatives?
There is nothing illegal in the US about taking a woman to a restaurant and paying her time for the restaurant. Everything is quite legal once you are willing to wine/dine/entertain her in addition to boinking her
What that is, is a faux relationship in the USA.
When I'm up in the Great White North, I only pay for companionship for a period of time, which complies with the law of not *advertising* for the sake of a bo*nk.
In contrast, the USA vice squad/sting ops crew, gets ppl to invoke these sort of time dimensions, with the supposition that the intent, was the bo*nk. Thus, in order to completely avoid these sanctions, one must pay completely, for a relationship.
Thus, many of these American Sugar Babies are paid monthly, just to stick around the bankers, for the occasional bo*nk.
That's how the laws are evaded.
I don't think that's evading the law per se. The guys are after something more than just boink. They probably want the real girlfriend experience without the (or with less of) the drama, while providing for the girls like a marriage-light of shorter term; i.e keeping away the unfavorable components of the current family law.
From the girls' perspective, it's an opportunity for them to meet and date more established men, which is a turn-on for women just like female beauty is a turn-on for men. Some of them may also try catching a man in a long term relationship.
Both sides seem to want more than the shoot-and-scoot arrangement that you are used to up in Montreal.
Ceffer
2014 Sep 21, 4:33pm
From the girls' perspective, it's an opportunity for them to meet and date more established men, which is a turn-on just for women just like female beauty is a turn-on for men. Some of them may also try catching a man in a long term relationship.
No wonder so many marriages work out so well. They start out as cesspools of exploitation, accommodation, advantage shifting, power plays, blackmail, extortion, guilt tripping and solvency contracts, then get better from there.
From the girls' perspective, it's an opportunity for them to meet and date more established men, which is a turn-on just for women just like female beauty is a turn-on for men. Some of them may also try catching a man in a long term relationship.
No wonder so many marriages work out so well. They start out as cesspools of exploitation, accommodation, advantage shifting, power plays, blackmail, extortion, guilt tripping and solvency contracts, then get better from there.
Hmm, perhaps I did not phrase it correctly in my previous post. I did not mean the girl might try blackmailing a married man . . . but rather, turning a "good catch" of a man into a husband or long term boyfriend for herself.
70+% divorces take place due to financial reasons. The post-modern feminist concept of husband and woman being equals may not be correct. Both the man and the woman might be happier if the husband can provide for the family financially and in terms of leadership. The two getting married at about the same age may well be a big mistake: by the time the man is established enough to provide for a pregnant wife and stay-home wife for the new-born, the wife in that kind of marriage may well have become too old to bear children. The result is often the couple having to have child when the wife is getting old yet the husband is not yet well established enough to provide for her and the children. Those families are the ones facing hardship and very high divorce rate. The marriages between high income couples or couples where the established husband is significantly older than the wife are doing fine. It should not be a surprise. That's how traditional marriages used to be before post-modern feminism and skyrocketting divorce rates.
Ceffer
2014 Sep 21, 4:57pm
The old wive's advice is still good: beguile a rich old croaker, then poison his coffee when the time is right after fulfilling your biologic destiny with a few kids, and then cat around in leisure.
The old wive's advice is still good: beguile a rich old croaker, then poison his coffee when the time is right after fulfilling your biologic destiny with a few kids, and then cat around in leisure.
LOL. The 40-27 (half + 7) matchups can do just fine; he at his prime and she is at hers. 10yrs into the marriage, he is 50 and she is 37, both are starting their back slopes and can get old together, without much resentment towards each other.
Rin
2014 Sep 21, 10:45pm
I did not phrase it correctly in my previous post. I did not mean the girl might try blackmailing a married man . . . but rather, turning a "good catch" of a man into a husband or long term boyfriend for herself.
What you're talking about is far more common in a culture like Japan than in the USA. There, yes, a lot of young women, like to be taken cared off, by an older man with the possibility for a future long term relationship, like a full time consort.
The USA, on the other hand, is a society fueled by lies, half-truths, and so-forth. In reality, no man no matter how rich he is, is better off, keeping those relationships in Mexico or Brazil, than stateside. This so-called Ivy League graduate would later, get a book contract, using femi-nazi titles like ... "How a Princeton co-ed became a Prisoner to the Wolves of Wall St", using faux notions that she was exploited and didn't enter the arrangement on her own volition.
As far as I'm concerned ... no thanks. I'm not interested in some hokey conversations about her readings of Kant or Descartes, attempting to make herself look cultured. I'd been through that nonsensical stage during my earlier years. And BTW, the seven sister schools have been playing that game for generations. The only difference now is that the intel has gone mainstream. Before, the bus from Norton College to Brown University was called the f*ck truck, by the men at Brown, same for the Wellesley bus to Harvard/MIT. So much for feminist ideals there, eh?
Peter P
2014 Sep 22, 1:18am
People need to get real. Exploitation, as a form of arbitrage, improves humanity.
Rin, what about dating someone who believes in Sex Magick?
« First « Previous Comments 140 - 179 of 218 Next » Last » Search these comments
I had a chat with an old acquaintance from high school. She was one of the few girls who was in the advanced chemistry section and did extremely well on the Olympiads. Unlike her female counterpart in that course, who'd later become a snotty premed at Columbia, she was down to earth and basically, a nice person, and rather attractive. She'd gone onto college (not Ivy league), dated an engineering type, and they'd gotten married upon graduation. A decade and a half later, they're still together and quite happy.
I'd asked her if she advocates this whole settling down and relationship thing to others. Her response was basically *no* and that's because she'd met her current husband in the flow of their lives. She wasn't on the *hunt* (as her gal pals put it) and she'd met someone organically, without a bunch of miscues and half-truths. They were first friends; then they dated, and afterwards, decided that they'd spend their lives together. It was always a clear channel of communication. The ppl she'd met, after college and especially in the workforce, were not all that genuine and she could tell that ppl more or less, lied to each other, more often than not. If she weren't already settled with the right guy by then, she may have avoided dating altogether, just to keep away from the games. Today, even though she's got a few acquaintances who're still available, she wouldn't recommend any of them for me to date, because essentially, they'd dumped the "nice engineer", earlier on in life, and were more or less, trying to salvage their mismanaged life situations but still dating the bad guys or the ones who can't commit, good or bad.
We also had a lengthy discussion on Turtledove and defending blood relatives over other relationships. She's half Irish-American and said that the fact that the prominent Bulger family didn't formally disown mobster/mass murderer Whitey Bulger, not only casted doubt about their own complicity, since it was already rumored that Bill Bulger (former president of UMass and the state legislature), had helped Whitey flee from the FBI in Boston, but it also reflected poorly on Irish-Americans in general. Sure, the ethnic stereotypes about drunken brawlers had ended during her dad's generation, however, what remained was this notion of clannish tribalism where it's ok to secretly give money to the IRA, to kill/maim innocent English ppl. Thus, she despises members of her dad's ethnicity who'd supported the IRA and at the same time, doesn't like the glib notion that it's ok to hurt an Englishman, Russian, German, Asian but don't mess with the Irish. In her opinion, those A-holes should move back to Ireland and hand over their American passports.
Now, do I regret not having pursued this person back in HS? My only answer to that is that one can't sit around and dream about inventing a time machine. We live in the present and move into the future. With that said, ok, perhaps I could have pursued her back then but you know what, I was dealing with a lot of stuff at home. Remember my sister? One of the reasons why my friend is still my friend is that I didn't bring her into a nuclease where my sister could have sabotaged our friendship. Trust me on this one, no one from the sis' graduating class speaks to her today. She driven 'em all away. Ok, should I have then pursued her during college? Well, our schools were many hours apart. It was destined that she'd meet someone on her campus and myself, on my campus. So there you have it; one guy won the coin toss and other guy didn't.
Am a currently looking for a woman, with the above personality? And once again, I believe that that's living life, looking at a rear view mirror. I've moved on. Now, why can't members of mainstream society accept this?