0
0

Another example of why religion is bad: Medical students skip evolution classes


 invite response                
2011 Nov 27, 11:55am   35,389 views  124 comments

by Dan8267   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

Muslim students, including trainee doctors on one of Britain's leading medical courses, are walking out of lectures on evolution claiming it conflicts with creationist ideas established in the Koran.

Professors at University College London have expressed concern over the increasing number of biology students boycotting lectures on Darwinist theory, which form an important part of the syllabus, citing their religion.

Similar to the beliefs expressed by fundamentalist Christians, Muslim opponents to Darwinism maintain that Allah created the world, mankind and all known species in a single act.

Full Article

Surprise, surprise. This time the religion is Islam. Whoopie doo.

Yes, evolution does contradict the Koran, the Bible, and every "holy" book ever written. Whenever science contradicts your religion, your religion is wrong. Deal with it.

Now, this isn't just an academic issue. These are people training to be doctors. These are people who want to be able to perform surgery on you, prescribe medicine, diagnose disease, and research new treatments. This is big shit here.

It is commonly said that you can't understand anything in biology without evolution. It is absolutely critical that doctors not only understand the basics of evolutions, but all the nitty, gritty details.

Take for example, AIDS. Yep, that disease. It's called by a virus named HIV. The thing is, when you give medicine to people who have AIDS, at first it impedes the replication of HIV and then it doesn't. You have to take the person off of medication and then put them back on later.

This makes absolutely no fucking sense whatsoever unless you realize that HIV is composed of many strains with different genetic code that compete against each other. By changing the host's chemistry, you allow drug-resistant strains to prosper why killing off the non-drug-resistant strains. But to prevent the resistant strains from killing the patient, you must then take him off the medicine so that the non-resistant strains can crush the resistant ones. It's literally managing the evolution of a virus within a human being.

Also, recently it has been discovered that some women are immune to AIDS. The way some diseases become non-threatening, is that they kill off all non-resistant hosts allowing the resistant ones to pass along their genes including the disease fighting one. This is literally evolution happening right now in our species. Given enough time, our species would adapt to AIDS and it would become a non-life-threatening disease. Understanding how this works in minute detail is essential to finding a cure without waiting for billions of deaths over centuries.

So when this ass-wipes refuse to listen to lectures on evolution because of their "faith", I say their faith makes it impossible for them to be qualified as doctors. Sorry, but you can't piss all over science and expect to still reap its rewards. The technologies and high paying jobs come with the price of accepting and embracing the knowledge upon which they were built.

Evolution is both a theory and a fact. And it is the very basis of all our understanding of biology, ecosystems, and medical science including genetics. Evolution has practical implications, life-and-death implications. Multibillion dollar per year industries are built on exploiting evolution to create biological batteries or mass produce silk for soft body armor.

Perhaps most important, the lack of willingness to accept evolution because of religious dogma demonstrates a lack of rationality that cannot be tolerate in important professions like doctors or policy makers. To completely disregard reality because of some arbitrary myth is to show the lack of critical thinking ability. Anyone who does that should not be allowed in the medical profession or in public office.

« First        Comments 102 - 124 of 124        Search these comments

102   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 12, 2:04pm  

Dan8267 says

Not when you get hit by a bus. There's way more to learn about than nutrition when it comes to earning a D.M. And the vast majority of doctors do not become nutritionist. I suspect those who do, take more than one course in it.

No they prefer to treat patients chronically, more $$$. I have personally seen 3 people get well by juicing. But doctors told my mom n law it wasn't a good idea. One person, by juicing, got to throw out her high blood pressure medicine. The second saw a chronic illness of 7 years disappear. The third was a boy who had a 102 fever go away within 6 hours.
Even more stories where people are healed from cancers. Google it.
But yeah you can worship the docs if you want. And yes i know they are great for many accident injuries. But, however they also prefer to do chemo and all other sorts of "practice" without any regard of nutrition first.

Oh yeah and the godlike doctors also gave thousands upon thousands labotomies ( forgive spelling) in the 50's or so. They don't don't do that anymore. I guess when they were practicing then they made some poor judgements.

103   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 12, 2:07pm  

Dan8267 says

Practicing medicine is not a right. It is a privilege earned by going through the rigorous process of medical training.

Yes and from there they "practice". Don't assume the world is flat because someone said so. I am not questioning the Science behind the science, but the fact is the universe is vast.

104   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 12, 2:16pm  

And science on going. We learn new things everyday. Ok so you know so much to completely disrespect people religion then please tell me this;
Who, what, where, when, and why of the pyramids of Egypt?

105   Dan8267   2011 Dec 12, 11:42pm  

KILLERJANE says

Ok so you know so much to completely disrespect people religion then please tell me this;

How the fuck is insisting that medical students actually attend the core classes of their curriculum before practicing medicine "disrespecting people's religion"? That is the most asinine statement I've heard in a long time.

If my religion refused to acknowledge the existence of atoms because it contradicted my holy book, would I be excused from taking an organic chemistry class and still be allowed to practice medicine? What if my religion forbids the study of anatomy? Evolution is no different. Grow up.

106   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 12:40am  

I never said that. But as for you your headline, you are as closed minded as those who insist that only evolution was involved.

107   MisdemeanorRebel   2011 Dec 13, 12:41am  

KILLERJANE says

I have personally seen 3 people get well by juicing.

And here's a website for "Survivors" of these diets.
http://www.beyondveg.com/

108   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 12:43am  

If you don't want to seek new info and ideas, then why do you post? This is a discussion forum. Or is it a way to make you feel better about yourself?

109   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 12:45am  

There is scientific proof that other life producing worlds exist. Maybe they had an influence here?

110   MisdemeanorRebel   2011 Dec 13, 2:39am  

KILLERJANE says

There is scientific proof that other life producing worlds exist. Maybe they had an influence here?

News to me. I heard there are candidates for planets that support life, and it is possible there may be bacterial life under the surface of Mars, but no scientific proof.

Got Links?

111   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 3:44am  

Check google news recently. Another report out a couple days ago, kepler, i believe. I am working now. Have good day.

112   uomo_senza_nome   2011 Dec 13, 4:21am  

KILLERJANE says

But as for you your headline, you are as closed minded as those who insist that only evolution was involved.

I think Dan's point is that if your religious belief is so completely inconsistent with well-established, factually supported science -- then it is best to reevaluate your beliefs. That's not close mindedness, that's asking for more open-mindedness.

KILLERJANE says

I am not questioning the Science behind the science, but the fact is the universe is vast.

I guess you are trying to say that "we don't know everything". This is true and I think we all agree on that. Sure, but there is a well-established, time tested, fool-proof method to know what you are curious to know: which is observation.

KILLERJANE says

One person, by juicing, got to throw out her high blood pressure medicine. The second saw a chronic illness of 7 years disappear. The third was a boy who had a 102 fever go away within 6 hours.
Even more stories where people are healed from cancers. Google it.

Healthy food is important regardless of the age. But to say "juicing" can cure so many deadly diseases is an extraordinary claim, therefore requires extraordinary proof. Here's the problem: Internet is no different than the real world, there are full of quacks. How to tell the difference? By scrutinizing what you read.

113   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 5:24am  

No read his headline, his point is that religion is bad and medicine good. Whatever. Read headline. The evolution point he makes below that is mostly understandable, but still a bit small minded.

114   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 5:30am  

uomo_senza_nome says

Healthy food is important regardless of the age. But to say "juicing" can cure so many deadly diseases is an extraordinary claim, therefore requires extraordinary proof. Here's the problem: Internet is no different than the real world, there are full of quacks. How to tell the difference? By scrutinizing what you read.

Not saying it is 100% cure all. But doctors should study it, and it is not required in a significant way under there curriculum.

Gerson-key word for one set of 50 case studies.

115   Dan8267   2011 Dec 13, 5:42am  

KILLERJANE says

No read his headline, his point is that religion is bad and medicine good. Whatever. Read headline. The evolution point he makes below that is mostly understandable, but still a bit small minded.

Thinking saying and doing need to line up.

I think it's pretty well supported that religion is bad if it causes unqualified and untrained people to become doctors. Yes, that's really bad. That's life and death bad. Can't get more black and white than that. Just take a look at all the examples of why it's bad listed in this thread.

Dan8267 says

f my religion refused to acknowledge the existence of atoms because it contradicted my holy book, would I be excused from taking an organic chemistry class and still be allowed to practice medicine? What if my religion forbids the study of anatomy?

Can you honestly make the point that medical students should be able to cherry pick which requirements apply to them because of religious reasons? That would not only be absurd, it would be dangerous.

116   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 5:45am  

Dan8267 says

I think it's pretty well supported that religion is bad if it causes unqualified and untrained people to become doctors. Yes, that's really bad. That's life and death bad. Can't get more black and white than that. Just take a look at all the examples of why it's bad listed in this thread.

Staff infection and medical malpractice and chemo also kill masses.

117   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 5:47am  

Dan8267 says

Can you honestly make the point that medical students should be able to cherry pick which requirements apply to them because of religious reasons? That would not only be absurd, it would be dangerous.

No i don't make that point, but i am not going for your short sided black and white approach either.

118   Dan8267   2011 Dec 13, 7:48am  

KILLERJANE says

Staff infection and medical malpractice and chemo also kill masses.

And that's relevant how?

119   Dan8267   2011 Dec 13, 7:50am  

KILLERJANE says

No i don't make that point, but i am not going for your short sided black and white approach either.

Some things are black and white, like slavery is bad. Just because one side is indefensible, doesn't make the other side "short-sighted". The Earth is round and anyone who says different is simply wrong, not insightful. It's ok to call bullshit, bullshit, especially when lives are on the line.

120   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 13, 12:27pm  

Of couse, I say black and white and you respond slavery. Take your doctors advice on the labotamy, i am sure it couldn't hurt. Pun intended.

121   Bap33   2011 Dec 13, 1:01pm  

the Earth is not round. It is an orb-like shape that is much larger around the equator than the circum. is at 90* to the equator.

A circle is round.

Just messing with you Dan. lol

122   Dan8267   2011 Dec 14, 5:16am  

Bap33 says

the Earth is not round. It is an orb-like shape that is much larger around the equator than the circum. is at 90* to the equator.

This is actually a common misconception. Nothing is perfectly round, as the fact that everything is made of atoms prevents that. However, you can measure how close to "round" an object is.

Earth's Diameter at the Equator: 7,926.28 miles (12,756.1 km)
Earth's Diameter at the Poles: 7,899.80 miles (12,713.5 km)

The difference between the major and minor axis of the Earth is a mere 0.334%. To put that in perspective, the Earth is about as smooth as an official billiards ball. The World Pool-Billiard Association states "All balls must be composed of cast phenolic resin plastic and measure 2 ¼ (+.005) inches [5.715 cm (+ .127 mm)] in diameter". So a billiards ball may deviate up to 0.222%. The Earth is pretty close to that level of smoothness.

123   Bap33   2011 Dec 14, 9:42am  

wouldn't it be the same to say, "Bap is right. And in a related story, billiards balls are not very true either."? lol

124   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 14, 2:02pm  

Bap is right

« First        Comments 102 - 124 of 124        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions