by null ➕follow (4) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 27 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
Eric Holder saysT-62s are outdated against pretty much everyting. No reactive armor, weak 115mm cannon, it's fucking pathetic really.
Exactly the reason for the 2nd amendment! Everyone should be allowed to own a panzerfaust if they can't afford a modern antitank missile, just in case.
Bd6r saysPatnetters should listen more to what Trump says
Nah, they'd rather agree with that Ocasio-Cortez cunt if it confirms their (rather inexplicable) hots for Putler, LOL.
bribery/kickback scheme.
richwicks says
bribery/kickback scheme.
Post proof of bribery/kickbacks scheme in the lend-lease act or GTFO. It's easy to post bullshit propaganda.
richwicks says
bribery/kickback scheme.
Post proof of bribery/kickbacks scheme in the lend-lease act or GTFO. It's easy to post bullshit propaganda.
So if my neighbor decides to start kidnapping my children, kills some and destroys my garage, I should give him my yard so he will stop?
So if my neighbor decides to start kidnapping my children, kills some and destroys my garage, I should give him my yard so he will stop?
No he would not. Ukraine is not a US problem. The sanctions is all he would have done. Maybe made a few phone calls to Europe that would have been like, "You so worried now, then you fork up the $$$$ and send your kids to go fight."
RWSGFY saysBut they have a fucking shitload of them.
Exactly.
Ukraine is toast. Period
HunterTits saysUkraine is toast. Period
We've heard that for last 3 months. First a few days and they are toast, then a few weeks, etc. Not toast yet.
BUT NOW THAT GLORIOUS T-62s HAVE ENTERED THE BATTLE IT'S A MATTER OF HOURS, NOT DAYS!!
HunterTits saysUkraine is toast. Period
We've heard that for last 3 months. First a few days and they are toast, then a few weeks, etc. Not toast yet.
time on Russia's side or Ukraine's and their ally predator's side?
richwicks saystime on Russia's side or Ukraine's and their ally predator's side?
Neither, the question is who will collapse faster.
Russia is better off today than they were a year ago.
Russia can continue this forever.
RWSGFY saysBUT NOW THAT GLORIOUS T-62s HAVE ENTERED THE BATTLE IT'S A MATTER OF HOURS, NOT DAYS!!
DID YOU SEE RUSSIANS ARMED WITH THEM MOSIN NAGANT RIFLES? A SURE SIGN THAT UKRAINE IS DEAD!
richwicks saysRussia is better off today than they were a year ago.
Why didn't they do all this beneficial to them shit (minus the war) a year ago if it is sooo good for them? Or 10 years ago?
Eric Holder saysrichwicks saysRussia is better off today than they were a year ago.
Why didn't they do all this beneficial to them shit (minus the war) a year ago if it is sooo good for them? Or 10 years ago?
They were trying to cooperate and play nice with the West - they've been trying to do this for 2 decades. They wanted to expand markets, do manufacturing for Europe, etc. That window is now closed with this war, for a decade at least.
THAT RIFLE HAS SIGHTS MARKED UP TO 2000 YARDS!!!! IT MEANS EVERYBODY DEAD IN A MILE AND A QUARTER CIRCLE AROUND IT!!!!!!
Why do that if being closed and isolated makes them "better off than a year ago"?
Makes no logical sense. Are you really an engineer or just stayed at Motel 6 once?
pudil says
If Trump had been in office he would have engaged militarily which is why Russia didn’t invade while he was in office.
When you elect oat meal for brains because you don’t like mean tweets, well… elections have consequences.
No he would not. Ukraine is not a US problem. The sanctions is all he would have done. Maybe made a few phone calls to Europe that would have been like, "You so worried now, then you fork up the $$$$ and send your kids to go fight."
The 40 billion dollar check has cleared, they don't need Ukraine anymore.
« First « Previous Comments 27 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,194,337 comments by 13,889 users - Patrick online now