« First « Previous Comments 53 - 79 of 79 Search these comments
> richwicks
Arguing via doctored images now, are we?
Google (or duckduckgo)
None of that translates I into military capacity to stop Putin from rolling into Ukraine.
But that too, is not our problem.
Who cares what is "internationally recognized"? Why do YOU think this is relevant? Every fucking government is run by a criminal syndicate. Oh, the criminal syndicates don't "recognize" the country. As if anybody, including you, should give a shit about their dumb fucking "opinion".
Ukraine because the Donetsk region has a high number of Russians living there, S. Ossetia to repel invading Georgians at the request of the S. Ossetian government.
Explain the logic. Being able to read Russian makes no difference, anymore that being able to read English makes any difference in understanding MY nation.
Really? Name the 7 wars.
No, a strong nationalistic Poland disadvantages the EU which in turn disadvantages the United States. A strong nationalistic anything in the EU is a disadvantage to the EU. They intend to become a singular political bloc. We all know that.
I'm pretty quick in spotting logical fallacies at this point.
richwicks saysWho cares what is "internationally recognized"? Why do YOU think this is relevant? Every fucking government is run by a criminal syndicate. Oh, the criminal syndicates don't "recognize" the country. As if anybody, including you, should give a shit about their dumb fucking "opinion".
By that logic, US invasion of Iraq and Syria is perfectly fine. Kurds wanted US troops there, they wanted US attack, so bombing Saddam and Assad was all fine and dandy...you apply different logic to Russia vs. USA.
richwicks saysUkraine because the Donetsk region has a high number of Russians living there, S. Ossetia to repel invading Georgians at the request of the S. Ossetian government.
Kurds in Syria and Iraq, Albanians in Kosovo, etc. US behaves in exactly the same way as Russia.
richwicks saysExplain the logic. Being able to read Russian makes no difference, anymore that being able to read English makes any difference in understanding MY nation.
A lot of information about Russia is exclusively in Russian.
richwicks saysReally? Name the 7 wars.
Ukraine, Georgia twice, Moldova, CAR, Syria (they did not start but they participate), Libya (did not start but participate), Chechnya twice. Probably something else that I have forgotten.
richwicks saysNo, a strong nationalistic Poland disadvantages the EU which in turn disadvantages the United States. A strong nationalistic anything in the EU is a disadvantage to the EU. They intend to become a singular political bloc. We all know that.
No we don't know that. Poland is extremely pro-American, and is widely hated in Europe for that. Strong Poland is a disadvantage to EU and an advantage to US as in they buy a lot of US weapons. Strong Poland is a disadvantage to Russia as in they will help Ukraine.
richwicks saysI'm pretty quick in spotting logical fallacies at this point.
Did you spot logical fallacies in your own reasoning, for example in all US invasions bad, all Russian invasions good?
There is a snippet of local Donbass separatist news where an hr after downing the airplane they boasted about shooting down Kiev regime transport plane. One of Donbas separatist leaders (Girkin) admitted to shooting down the plane.
But of course all of this information is in Russian, and knowledge of Russian is not necessary for some to come to conclusions about anything happening in former USSR...
No, the invasions didn't do anything for the United States. It has only hurt the United States. My definition of the "United States" doesn't mean "the government of the United States", it's the people of the United States.
Russia is free to waste as much money as they want.
I'd just be hearing hearsay anyhow.
A short incursion is not the same thing as years upon years of wars, and trillions of dollars spent.
Name all the ways this has helped this country
I don't care of Russia destroys itself. Wars are neither "good" nor "bad" - they are beneficial or detrimental. I don't see in any way how any of the last 20 years of wars the US has engaged in have been beneficial to this nation in any way, and several ways they have been detrimental.
richwicks saysNo, the invasions didn't do anything for the United States. It has only hurt the United States. My definition of the "United States" doesn't mean "the government of the United States", it's the people of the United States.
Russians invading neighboring countries also did not do much positive things for Russia.
These changed relatively pro-Russian Ukrainians into anti-Russian ones. Basically, Russians made enemies all around their country...
richwicks saysRussia is free to waste as much money as they want.
That is absolutely true. But we should not say that this Russian waste of money is different from US waste of money...other than not being our business
richwicks saysI'd just be hearing hearsay anyhow.
You would be able to, for example, listen to what Doneck separatist leaders say etc. Much more information available, including about the Malaysian airlines that you make statements above.
richwicks saysA short incursion is not the same thing as years upon years of wars, and trillions of dollars spent.
Russian troops are in Moldova since 1992, for example. I believe this does not qualify as a "short intrusion"
richwicks saysName all the ways this has helped this country
I have never claimed that any of these wars have benefitted USA.
richwicks saysI don't care of Russia destroys itself. Wars are neither "good" nor "bad" - they are beneficial or detrimental. I don't see in any way how any of the last 20 years of wars the US has engaged in have been beneficial to this nation in any way, and several ways they have been detrimental.
Agreed, but then I don't understand your whitewashing of Russian aggressions.
They are not much if any of US business, but one should not say that US attacking someone is wrong while at the same time excusing nearly identical Russian attacks. That does not make any logical sense.
richwicks saysWe're going to go the way of the USSR
USSR. An Atheist's paradise.
your false faith
"Biden Made a 180 Degree Reversal With Ukraine - Something Else Is At Play Here"
I'm more scared of the unknown reason they have done so, than I am from any military threat out there.
Ahhh, Gen Rall Mirrey, you do vely fine work. Much job consultant for Boeing, you come China help after Retirement. Half a million for a few years, no show job, you work from home. So very good.
Strange, Russia owns a small area on the Baltic Sea between Lithuania and Poland called Kalliningrad Oblast granted after WWII. They have tried to sell it back to adjoining countries, but nobody wants it, so they park a bunch of military equipment and bases there.
richwicks saysyour false faith
Ahem,
yes I know, you are so smart that you know what's inside the mind of others. I did not profess any faith on this website nor elsewhere.
That's the homeland of my great-grandfather going back many generations.
F*ckin' Nazis ruined it by creating a situation that the Soviet Union expelled the Germans. We cannot blame the Russians for doing that, but now there's no residual German cultural sites for folks like me to visit. :(
F*ckin' Nazis.
They have tried to sell it back to adjoining countries
Maybe they were just asking too much for it. Adjacent countries know Russia could just steam roller them, anyway, why buy something from them.
« First « Previous Comments 53 - 79 of 79 Search these comments
https://canadafreepress.com/article/how-clinton-and-obama-disarmed-and-abandoned-ukraine?source=patrick.net