« First « Previous Comments 27 - 56 of 56 Search these comments
the lamestream media.
I saw the video.
INSANE DEATH_DEALING BLM NEGROES AND! MUSLIMANIACS were bayonetting white voters and beheading Trump poll watchers.
And
MICHELLE OBAMA'S IMMENSE PREHENSILE PENIS lurking around trying to be incognito wearing shades and a BLM t-shirt, FOOLING NO ONE!
Technology hasn't been fast and efficient enough to run and store election results until the 90s maybe. So there's an argument that elections used to be done differently for a long time and haven't been the same for 150 years. If necessary go back to in person paper ballot votes only and stringent ID requirements. The fraud has been set up more recently by systematically eroding any checks and requirements during the last 2 decades.
NoCoupForYou saysCdon2 saysIts the opposite. Both parties agreed to the conditions of the election in advance.
Why did every Pennsylvania and Michigan county, except 2-3 of them, allow full oversight by Republican pollwatchers when they were counting the mail ballots?
Were the scores of counties that allowed Republican Pollwatchers/Observers wrong, but two or three of the solid monopoly D counties doing it right?
That alone should at least make those counties revote or exclude all votes. I mean observers denied entry, harassment, boarding up the place? Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Cmon man what is this, Somalia?!
the cornerstone of trumps 2024 run.
The corrupt democrats
Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ
Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo
There is sufficient evidence of several kinds which prove that a significant number of votes were 1. Stolen from Trump 2. Given to Biden as a result of fraud to change the outcome of an election for President.
This will be sufficient for the Supreme Court to get involved.
There are several kinds of fraud involved; vote changing with ballots, vote counting changes, and electronic vote count manipulation using software.
There is evidence in 1. Sworn affidavits 2. Statistical evidence 3. Software evidence. 4. Physical evidence (ballots)
porkchopexpress saysYou're totally right. My bad.Watch this. Trump knows what he has. The real stuff hasn't even come out yet.
www.youtube.com/embed/HH0AvaG3SqQ
Watch Pompeo's reaction. He knows the cards that Trump has. This is a done deal. Now it's a matter of containing the civil unrest that will result and watching high level officials squeal for immunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAQHXf60uRo
Didn't this happen a couple years ago?
mell saysCmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.
DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.
Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.
Plus, fraud, while rare, is wrong, and I do like the idea of remedying it, which is why I was happy to intervene if it would help the cause. The reality is the common sense notion of "fraud" is very easy to claim, in the public sphere, but very hard to prove in court. If counsel for POTUS cannot bring it soon, you really have to wonder if this is a sincere effort, or just another nothingburger which so often seems to be the case nowadays.
NoCoupForYou saysmell saysCmon man what is this, Somalia?!
Why, if WaPo and Politfact say it is okay, then it must be okay. I agree with the wise, therefore I am wise.
DEBOONKED! Now pardon me while I attend our third session this year on not misgendering a Tranny and the 32 genders, at my Office, we respect Science.
Wait for me here - as you can see, our waiting room stocks the Economist and the Atlantic. A sure sign of Quality.
OK, given your response, I am guessing you are thinking of the "I wasnt allowed in the room" claim which ran for the first few media cycles, but has also has been denied by POTUS counsel when pressed at oral argument. That said, I havent read everything and as I said when I started this, the great lesson of the national enquirer reporting on John Edwards was ...
Cdon is a propaganda plant. No lawyer would ever say that fraud is 'rare'. Also, no lawyer would come to a random blog to look for 'evidence'.
I suppose it is reassuring that somebody is frightened enough to think this is still necessary.
are you fucking kidding me? These poll workers have been doing shenanigans with voters ballots all night, they can see names, but you know who couldn't? The poll watchers who were ordered to stay so far away INSIDE the rooms that they couldn't read shit. And anybody is going to believe that people on the OUTSIDE with 21/21 vision can actually catch a glimpse of "private" data? Seriously, this is just skullduggery at this point. Whatever the legal standards are, it's clear that they obstructed poll watching to the fullest extent and thus the results need to be invalidated.
mell saysare you fucking kidding me? These poll workers have been doing shenanigans with voters ballots all night, they can see names, but you know who couldn't? The poll watchers who were ordered to stay so far away INSIDE the rooms that they couldn't read shit. And anybody is going to believe that people on the OUTSIDE with 21/21 vision can actually catch a glimpse of "private" data? Seriously, this is just skullduggery at this point. Whatever the legal standards are, it's clear that they obstructed poll watching to the fullest extent and thus the results need to be invalidated.
I wonder if anyone in the room that was put so far back, challenged every ballot every working in the room picked up?
Poll Watcher
"I contest that ballot the signatures don't match!"
Poll worker
"How can you tell, you're too far back to see it!"
Poll Watcher
"EXACTLY! so bring it over there so I can see it!"
I wonder if anyone in the room that was put so far back, challenged every ballot every working in the room picked up?
Poll Watcher
"I contest that ballot the signatures don't match!"
Poll worker
"How can you tell, you're too far back to see it!"
Poll Watcher
"EXACTLY! so bring it over there so I can see it!"
Is Trump the right guy to do cleanup?
Cdon is a propaganda plant.
I disagree. He's a legit old-time user (2012) of patrick.net back under a separate name.
« First « Previous Comments 27 - 56 of 56 Search these comments
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=2774849979467215&ref=notif¬if_id=1605804969206932¬if_t=live_video
As of a minute ago video link has been removed by facebook. 1984
Amount of fraud in Michigan and Wisconsin is out of this world.
- When Republican poll watchers left in Michigan, democrats pulled in trucks of ballots and started scanning them 3 at a time, they didn't have enogh time to full fill them out so they just filled in the president bubble, not the rest of the ballot even.
- Similar situation in Wisconsin and Georgia
Hundreds of witnesses.
Democrats are turning America into a banana republic, stealing election. Started with BLM beating people down telling them they'll be burned down if they vote for Trump, but that wasn't enough, so they are stuffing ballot boxes.