« First « Previous Comments 51 - 76 of 76 Search these comments
Open the above photo link.
Guiliani is 5 foot 9 inches. Bloomberg looks about 4 inches shorter than Guiliani in the photo.
Campaign slogan for Blooberg:
"Elect a man who can deal with Putin eye to eye."
Bloomberg has been running ad here in Virginia (a Super Tuesday state) that is composed of old Obama clips, but these clips show Obama praising Bloomberg, plus several stills of Obama posing with Bloomberg. I do not know if Obama approves of this, but watching that ad gives the impression that Obama endorses and highly supports Bloomberg, especially since the clips and pics are presented as if they were recent.
Where's Bloomberg in blackface? This is something that Dem politics needs!
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change
facts are facts
Does someone think height is an important characteristic of a president?
Does someone think height is an important characteristic of a president?
« First « Previous Comments 51 - 76 of 76 Search these comments
Note that the article is locked due to "vandalism", by which they mean the reporting of Bloomberg's height, which is 5' 7"" from https://heightline.com/michael-bloomberg-worth-wife-age-height/ It is not reasonable to suppose that no one has tried to include Bloomberg's diminutive stature in the article, especially as Trump keeps calling it out in his Tweets.
Wikipedia has become terribly biased politically exactly as its wealth has dramatically increased, and it is a reasonable supposition that these two events are connected: wealthy Democratic donors have co-opted the Wikipedia to push the globalist agenda.
Please, do not donate to Wikipedia. They really don't need the money, and are using their massive fortune against the public interest already.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer