Comments 1 - 35 of 35 Search these comments
Also true about constructively addressing concerns.
For example, if it were a fact that we as a species would be better off with a much lower population (probably true at some point) how could that be addressed
Human activities brighten our landscape and our atmosphere. Might this ultimately make an ice age here? At the same time we are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect…. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth’s climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the Cosmos, into a kind of hell.
To believe that our species can avoid extinction
Another way to show it’s all a hoax is to ask yourself this: if the democrats really believed climate change is the emergency they say it is, why won’t they work with republicans in the areas where they share common ground?
Because it's a propaganda hoax disguised to convince religious believers that they are doing something altruistic and benign for the world environment, when they are just being chumped by the Globalists into giving over their prosperity and freedoms
What does green tech and nuclear power have to do with Global Warming fear mongering?
Because it's a propaganda hoax disguised to convince religious believers that they are doing something altruistic and benign for the world, when they are just chumped by the Globalists into giving over their prosperity and freedoms. Classic Bernays misdirection, and making something harmful to the many but beneficial to a few seem like an act of selfless and wise devotion.
AGW alarm is just an excuse to institute a global carbon tax. I’ve yet to year any intelligent explanation about what will be done with the money to actually combat climate change.
Why do you think Fossil fuel companies are the biggest funders of global warming denial "research ?"
Sounds slightly delusional to me.
Meanwhile nuclear reactor tech keeps on progressing and will certainly be part of the mix, maybe it's time is here ? That too take political impetus, since the stronger lobbying comes from existing fossil fuel industries that stand to lose big time when the shift finally occurs. As I think about it, who is lobbying for nuclear ?
which makes it baffling that you support and vote for leftists, whom you should reasonably despise.
And of course the absence of advocacy of nuclear power...the one readily available and economically viable alternate power source there is...is absolute proof that the “climate change” cabal is a fraud solely designed to enrich certain politically connected individuals, and largely taking advantage of a slew of useful idiots
SJws are said to make up about 8% of the population. That would make them about one sixth of democrats. I don't identify with that part of the left, just as you probably don't identify with the white supremacist part of the right or sub 90 IQ part of the right (not that there isn't an intersection between these 2 groups).
https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum
He is a very well-regarded scientist from a highly ranked school, has a shot at membership in National Academy of Sciences. I suspect that many if not most scientists think like him, but they have less ability to publicly say what they think due to AGW hypocrite witch-hunts.
Please read through this:
https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/status/1175244297530216450
"I think claims about melting ice and especially hurricane frequency have been contested rather convincingly. These counters could be wrong but I don't find them easy to dismiss.
On top of that, I am way more afraid of the plans of the cult-like alarmists than the weather and far more concerned about resource depletion and general environmental destruction than the climate. I actually don't think it is even possible to CONSTRUCTIVELY address concerns."