Comments 1 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
That just can't happen with continuous mass imports from the 3rd world. Assimilation should be the primary goal.
I don't care if all 9 million Londoner's were 100% Saxon blood, they would still have shit-tons of homeless. Centralization breeds stress, isolation, and contempt for your fellow man.
Emerging from Helsinki's grandiose central railway station on a bitterly cold evening, it does not take long before you notice something unusual.
There are no rough sleepers and no-one is begging.
The contrast with the UK's major towns and cities - where rough sleepers curled up in sleeping bags, blankets or tents are a common sight - is striking. ...
decentralized-back-to-the-states system
And where is the 'diversity' concentrated in the US? The batshit liberal policies is an outcome of the diversity.
Point is, "diversity" as such is not sufficient to make city or state crazy.
Diversity of skin color is A-Ok, as long as there is unified cultural values! Unified cultural values is far easier to accomplish if everyone is related and has same history, etc... But not necessary.
I don't care if all 9 million Londoner's were 100% Saxon blood, they would still have shit-tons of homeless. Centralization breeds stress, isolation, and contempt for your fellow man.
DallasDallas, 100 miles north where I lived 38 years until 2005, is having a crime wave, already more homicides than in 2018, with a fairly new black female police chief. Who saw that coming?
CBOEtrader saysDiversity of skin color is A-Ok, as long as there is unified cultural values! Unified cultural values is far easier to accomplish if everyone is related and has same history, etc... But not necessary.
+10000000000
Look at Tokyo. Even more people than London, essentially zero homeless.
Oh ... wait! No such thing occurred! Those ppl assimilated and married others of the American mainstream and now, are no different than anyone else, from the 1970s to 2010.
Good question.
The answer is simple: diversity destroys social cohesion. What can the UK learn from the Finns? They can learn that no one in a diverse society cares about his fellow citizens because they don't have the same ancestors, habits, customs, or even language. There is no real nation in a diverse society, just a set of nominal (unprotected) borders and official papers (or not, if you're an illegal).
Britain has a "ethnic fractionalization index" of 0.324 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_ranked_by_ethnic_and_cultural_diversity_level )
Finland has a much lower level of diversity, 0.132
The reason Finland's homeless programs work is that the Finns still care about each other, exactly because they are other Finns. Take a look at the photos of the people helped by Finland's programs:
They are Finns. That is exactly why other Finns can muster the political will to deal with homelessness.
And the US? 0.491
We are totally fucked by the diversity religion that is erasing the United States as a coherent entity.
Maybe a little diversity is good, like 5% of the population, but excess diversity is death.