patrick.net

Goran_K says

his sordid sexual history

... of placing his hands over women's tits while grinning at the camera

anon_4460e says

Goran_K says

his sordid sexual history

... of placing his hands over women's tits while grinning at the camera

Uh and admitting on camera to needing to reflect on his history of sexual aggressiveness towards dozens of women some dating back 20 years.

Hutch says

If roy moore is so innocent then why hasn't he sued the washington post for slander like he said he was going to do?

I think its because he is a yuge liar, not to mention a pepophile

I see, so he is in the middle of a campaign, fighting the good fight against the evil propaganda leftists and so that makes him guilty-liberal logic as usual.

Wookieman here,

Hutch says

Hutch here,

WTF is this? Seems like copy of the Roidy character here. Be yourself man. If you're new here, sorry, just seems like a copy cat shtick. We can see your username without the nonsense.

These accusers have caused enormous harm to those that have actually been sexually ASSAULTED. I don't believe any of these accusers at this point. Any of them. I really don't care what "team" you're for either. My wife wouldn't do this, but some man is now going to be charged with rape for slapping his wife's ass while she's cooking something cause she's wearing yoga pants.

(Quick side note. Fat women can stop wearing yoga pants today. Not tomorrow. Not in the new year when they will "lose" the weight. Take them off and put on some loose fitting jeans. Or sweat pants that you maybe can wear to run and make that ass spankable. I'm not sure when or how it became acceptable for fat women to wear this clothing. I guess some trends don't discriminate. Oh boy I wish they did.)

Liberal logic again. Here she is saying Roy moore wrote the whole thing at the 10.40 min mark. Now she claims she wrote it and liberals still argue this is not a forgery. SHE and Gloria allred made the claim-on their own. Now they got caught in a lie and say oops I wrote-that is what is called a forgery.

lostand confused says

Liberal logic again. Here she is saying Roy moore wrote the whole thing at the 10.40 min mark. Now she claims she wrote it and liberals still argue this is not a forgery. SHE and Gloria allred made the claim-on their own. Now they got caught in a lie and say oops I wrote-that is what is called a forgery.

Fox news says she just added the place and date after the signature. Experts say the note is moores signature. Are you saying fox news is wrong and the writing experts are wrong. That she wrote the note and forged the signature to it? Odd how she used different hand writing for his part of the note than for her addition.

Anything to back this up with or are we going with (liberal) fox is wrong and it's true because I say it's true?

bob2356 says

Fox news says she just added the place and date after the signature. Experts say the note is moores signature. Are you saying fox news is wrong and the writing experts are wrong. That she wrote the note and forged the signature to it? Odd how she used different hand writing for his part of the note than for her addition.

Anything to back this up with or are we going with (liberal) fox is wrong and it's true because I say it's true?

Liberals, liberals. Here is Beverly saying Roy Moore signed it and including the DA. Now she admits she signed the DA. As for the signature writing experts-leave it tot he experts to prove the liars that make up the liberal media. Watch at 10.40-what is she saying
www.youtube.com/embed/tHPOm6yIy6k&t=661s


Oh regarding the signature expert wapo
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/08/exclusive-handwriting-expert-touted-by-washington-post-turns-on-gloria-allred-calls-for-activist-attorney-to-release-yearbook/
Need a shovel to dig deeper?

Wake me up when she retracts her story. Even if she did, it would be even odds that someone paid her to retract it.

lostand confused says

Liberals, liberals. Here is Beverly saying Roy Moore signed it and including the DA. Now she admits she signed the DA. As for the signature writing experts-leave it tot he experts to prove the liars that make up the liberal media. Watch at 10.40-what is she saying

You are having a lot of trouble with the concept of signature. Are you saying a)he didn't write any of it, b)he wrote it all, or c)he wrote it and signed it then she added to it? Don't do a bretibart weasel deal, pick one and stand by it. If he wrote the note then signed his name and she added DA, the place, and date. So what? If it's true (unlike you I'll wait for some actual real evidence to actually decide) then why is some 30 something guy writing love notes in a high school kid's yearbook no matter what she added. That's just creepy and perverted.

Dig deeper at what? Where did I say what I believe about it? I'm just asking. Are you saying fox is wrong? It's a very simple question.

Your video doesn't work.

Hutch says

Hutch here, first I don't think I "do it" like roidy.

Everybody is free to believe what they like. Do note the only one who has lied is roy moore. First he says he knows Gibson then he says he doesn't know Gibson. Which is it roy?

Don’t forget that he is 15 years older thdn his wife, and by Roy Moores own words, he first frll in love with her when he saw her at a dance, when he was 30 and she was 15. But, he’s a Republican and Republicans are immoral trash, so, shame the victims he’s innocent. In Jesus name, Amen. Praise be to God

bob2356 says

You are having a lot of trouble with the concept of signature

That is you. It is not me saying. She said he signed the whole thing in her speech. Now she says she signed part of it-contradicting her own claim. She claimed it was the judge and outlined what he signed, now she is saying what she claimed the good Judge signed-she actually put it in there. Tis is not me, you, breitbart-I know liberal logic will never allow facts.

Hutch says

Sounds like we are all in agreement, roy moore is a Republican.

Hutch says

Hutch here,

Sounds like we are all in agreement, roy moore is a pedophile

Accused. By your logic , if I accuse you of being a child killer, then you are. No proof needed. liberals.

Again it is up to real news breitbart to provide proof. Breitbart needs a Pulitzer-the lying fake media should peddle stories about alien abduction and rectal exams. Beverly and Allred present evidence-on their own-claiming that Moore signed . Now they claim that no Bevely signed/wrote parts of those which had been called into questions. That is classic forgery-the document is forged. Moore has consistently said he did not and also he has asked for it to be turned over to an independent third party review-so they can give their verdict. Allred refuses-even though she is the one who produced the evidence and now we know why.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/08/forgery-explained-beverly-young-nelson-gloria-allred-presented-notes-roy-moores-writing/

The fact that she was caught red handed adding writing and claiming it to be Moore’s takes away most of her credibility.

That’s why Roy Moore will win a senate seat.

So a proven liar gets caught in a lie, admits the lie, but still wants us to believe her about this outrageous accusation (which can neither be proven nor prosecuted) and change vote to a creepy Emperor Palpatine dude because ... uh, right.

Sorry, Leftists lose this year, and hopefully for many years to come. We do NOT need the CONSERVATIVE LEFT dictating morality to us! Especially since the #metoo phenomenon has proven that particular Emperor has no fucking clothes, and is jerking off into a potted plant!

Hutch says

Republican logic, writing a note in your own personal yearbook = forgery

No. Claiming that the note you wrote was written by the one you accuse is forgery. Both her and Allred claimed that the portions were written by Moore. Now they claim she wrote it-after everyone points out inconsistencies.

Liberal logic-yeah right, liberals have no logic and their patron saint is trigglypuff.

Hutch says

Hutch here,

Republican logic, writing a note in your own personal yearbook = forgery

Goran here,

Democrat logic, Actually claiming writing was all original, then get caught lying, called out, and having to admit it was added much more recently = still honest.

Goran_K says

Democrat logic

Republican logic: Admitting that B is fake is the same as admitting that A is fake. Also, admitting that you painted your Nissan is the same as admitting it is not a Nissan. Also, admitting that you put ketchup on your hot dog makes it no longer a hot dog. Also, admitting anything makes you a loser that should not be trusted.

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

Admitting that B is fake is the same as admitting that A is fake. Also, admitting that you painted your Nissan is the same as admitting it is not a Nissan. Also, admitting that you put ketchup on your hot dog makes it no longer a hot dog. Also, admitting anything makes you a loser that should not be trusted.

Admitting you did something that you accused someone else of doing is fake.
Admitting you added ketchup to your dog-when you accused someone else of adding ketchup to trigger your allergies-that is fake.

Admitting something you did-the thing that you accused someone else of doing-yeah you be a fake.

lostand confused says

bob2356 says

You are having a lot of trouble with the concept of signature

That is you. It is not me saying. She said he signed the whole thing in her speech. Now she says she signed part of it-contradicting her own claim. She claimed it was the judge and outlined what he signed, now she is saying what she claimed the good Judge signed-she actually put it in there. Tis is not me, you, breitbart-I know liberal logic will never allow facts.

No answer to my simple question I see. Run and hide.

So what if she wrote some stuff in after his writing? Why are you not bothered by a 30 something year old perverted lecher writing this type of shit in a high school girls year book?

Damn it would be a really nice looking forest if all these fucking trees weren't in the way.

Goran_K says

The fact that she was caught red handed adding writing and claiming it to be Moore’s takes away most of her credibility.

That’s why Roy Moore will win a senate seat.

Looks like the voters agree that it's a forgery and they think the MSM is full of crap and Fake news:

bob2356 says

So what if she wrote some stuff in after his writing?

Except she and the Allred lady claimed Moore WROTE IT.

As usual liberals. It has come to this-so what she forged stuff? Do you need two shovels to dig deeper?

"It depends what your definition of is forged is"

Democrats already know that Moore will win:

anonymous says

who has been credibly accused of sexually abusing underage girls, to win and keep the party’s slim Senate majority? Or would he be such an albatross, causing bitter intra-party schisms, that it’s actually better for Republicans if the Democrat, Doug Jones, wins?

Maybe it will bring some sense into the feminazi word-where Gloria allred reigns supreme. Maybe, just maybe the feminazi rape of men might take a pause. Maybe feminzais finally realize equality means they get a job and not liveoff alimony and child support. Enogh of liberal crap.

Proof, due process-nope lynch mobs is just fine. Just like democrats supported slavery and fought to keep it and the KKK were democrats-dems always wrong.

lostand confused says

bob2356 says

So what if she wrote some stuff in after his writing?

Except she and the Allred lady claimed Moore WROTE IT.

As usual liberals. It has come to this-so what she forged stuff? Do you need two shovels to dig deeper?

Still ducking the first question. Do you say fox is wrong? Run and hide.

Still ducking the real issue. Did this creep write in the book or not? Run and hide.

The only shovels I will need is to dig you out of your hiding space.

lostand confused says

Admitting you added ketchup to your dog-when you accused someone else of adding ketchup to trigger your allergies-that is fake.

What about admitting to putting ketchup on a hot dog that Roy Moore gave you? What if expert hot dog analysts agree that they hot dog came from Roy Moore?
Tuesday will be interesting. If Roy Moore gets elected, we can look forward to a Senate ethics hearing. Trump better hope that Moore is clean. I'd hate to see the fallout from a guilty Moore hitting a beleaguered Trump.

anonymous says

Is it better for their candidate, Roy Moore, who has been credibly accused of sexually abusing underage girls, to win and keep the party’s slim Senate majority?

How many more seats will the republicans pick up when the rest of the democrat sleaze balls like Franken, Conyers, et al resign?

Democrats have a sexual harassment problem
The party’s leaders can't keep protecting sexual harassers and claim they’re the party of the resistance.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/28/16704580/democrats-sexual-harassment-conyers-franken-moore

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

What about admitting to putting ketchup on a hot dog that Roy Moore gave you? What if expert hot dog analysts agree that they hot dog came from Roy Moore?

Which is what Roy Moore is asking for. he has denied the claims and in the yearbook case he has consistently asked for Allred to release the yearbook to a third party independent analyst for analysis. Allred has consistently refused-now we know why.

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

If Roy Moore gets elected, we can look forward to a Senate ethics hearing.

Looks like he'll have to wait in line. There are plenty of politicians in line ahead of him. Will Franken let him cut the line?

lostand confused says

Which is what Roy Moore is asking for.

Doesn't he have a picture of the signature? Does he have an analyst who gives reason to doubt the claim?

Roy Moore claimed that he knew some of the accusers, but now claims he never knew any of them. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/roy-moore-now-claims-he-knows-none-of-his-accusers-contradicting-his-earlier-defenses/article/2642549
Should we now doubt all of Roy Moore's claim's? There were 30 people who either accused Moore or said that they heard of the encounters at the time that they happened. You would have to believe that they are all liars, and the Washington Post is doing a bogus hit job, and believe Roy Moore, who specifically and obviously lied about the issue.

The Media "fails" to mention most of the accuser's accusations (like those of Franken, too) are rather pathetic.

"He grabbed my butt 40 years ago one time."

Even if this things were true, is it a big deal if he did indeed grab an ass 40 years ago?

Another reason to be skeptical: Being attracted to teens is a lifelong thing as most sex preferences are. It wouldn't have stopped in 1982. It would have kept manifesting itself.

Also, there is no statute of limitations in Alabama for sexual crimes against teens. How come his accusers won't file a complaint?

Finally, it's awfully coincidental that all these people come out 30 days before an Election, but didn't say shit for decades.

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

Doesn't he have a picture of the signature? Does he have an analyst who gives reason to doubt the claim?

Most handwriting experts have said they need the original to make an analysis. A copy on the interwebz would be false. Roy Moore's accuser and Gloria Allred lied and said the date and place were signe dby him-now she admits to forging that. Case closed.

lostand confused says

Case closed.

Run and hide.

lostand confused says

Roy Moore's accuser and Gloria Allred lied and said the date and place were signe dby him-now she admits to forging that. Case closed.

OK. By that logic... Roy Moore admitted to knowing the women. Then he lied when he said he did not know all of those women. Case closed. Lock him up.

bob2356 says

Run and hide

Liberal logic. I have been saying the same thing, you throw some strange words -run hide, blah, blah, no logic, no argument-then run and hide and then emerge, say the same thing and then run and hide-LOL! You refuse to answer Gloria allred and Beverly nelson said Roy moore wrote those words. Then they now say she wrote those words. That is forgery -case closed.

"It's not forgery your honor. I simply added some zeros to this part of the check as 'notes to myself'. "

bob2356 says

Run and hide.

Get Off My Grass

lostand confused says

bob2356 says

Run and hide

Liberal logic. I have been saying the same thing, you throw some strange words -run hide, blah, blah, no logic, no argument-then run and hide and then emerge, say the same thing and then run and hide-LOL! You refuse to answer Gloria allred and Beverly nelson said Roy moore wrote those words. Then they now say she wrote those words. That is forgery -case closed

Just answer the questions. or run and hide which you are very good at.

So you don't embarrass yourself further the term is tampering, not forgery. If moore wrote the note and she added to it that would be tampering. Which is exactly what moore said in his letter to hannity. "I believe tampering has occurred". Which means he admits he wrote it the note and signed it. Which is back to why is some 30 something year old creep is writing love notes in a high school girls yearbook. Care to not address that issue once again? Run and hide.