« First « Previous Comments 37 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
That's a valid reason for posting the map. Why did you post it when asked how you arrived at Trump's odds of winning the election at 100%? It makes no sense in that context. It just provides a minor distraction while you avoided the question.
if that was my purpose, you have to admit, 15 post past, it was pretty effective.
That's a valid reason for posting the map. Why did you post it when asked how you arrived at Trump's odds of winning the election at 100%? It makes no sense in that context. It just provides a minor distraction while you avoided the question.
if that was my purpose, you have to admit, 15 post past, it was pretty effective.
I don't think anyone has forgotten that you dodged the question, because you're lying. Rather, it's being further scrutinized by others
I don't think anyone has forgotten that you dodged the question, because you're lying. Rather, it's being further scrutinized by others
The actual original thread was discussing just how badly the situation for the DNC is at the moment, but then you guys decided to talk about some irrelevant 538 analysis that was completely wrong anyway.
But you're just doing what the DNC is doing, avoiding any discussion of the internal problems with the party. IMO, this is a good thing because it'll lead to more losses for the party. So continue, please.
I don't think anyone has forgotten that you dodged the question
That's true. This all started with my original point that Trump's net disapproval is something like 16% at the moment. He's getting higher and higher disapproval's, so it's unlikely that the Republicans are going to win more seats in 2018. Nobody has come up with a legitimate argument against that. Goran said that the odds of Trump winning were 100%, which is an absurdity. Then, when asked for a reason, we got a map that Goran later admitted was a total non-sequitur. The thread is just proof that the TADS are irrational.
Trump's net disapproval is something like 16% at the moment.
Only 16%?
From reading the mainstream press you'd think it was 116%. There is never a single positive story about him in NY Times, WaPo, CNN, NPR etc.
But they are arrogantly disconnected from the majority of Americans.
"heavy drug use, sex with prostitutes and strippers", sounds like a Republican. On the other hand, Republicans do it on the DL.
Come on Patrick, for fuck sake Donald Trump spent the entire week ripping apart his own AG. How exactly do you spin this to be a positive story???
Sure, kinda bizarre, and yet irrelevant to his popularity.
Why did Trump get elected?
When the press honestly answers that question (and no, it's not "racism" or "fascism" or any ism at all) then they will begin to regain their credibility.
But it's too embarrassing for the press to admit that they are a core part of the problem (arrogant elites which have only contempt for real working people) so they won't answer honestly.
Only 16%?
It's pretty terrible when compared to other presidents. The only person who did as bad as Trump was Ford, who wasn't elected and pardoned Nixon. Clinton's approval numbers were bad too, but not as badly as Trump.
If you put the difference in terms of the percent of people who approve, it's about 45% more people disapprove than approve.
Additionally, there are 11 states that Trump won where more people disapprove than approve. That's a lot of states. He's going to have to turn things around if he wants another term. I'm guessing a lot of people voted to give him a chance, b/c they were so disgusted with the alternative. They are not happy with the result.
I agree that Trump is a bit dangerous and perhaps not particularly competent, but he is a refreshing break from the utter domination of all public discourse by those arrogant elites and their laws which tell people which pronouns they can and cannot use.
I see Trump isn't doing anything about it and I know for a fact he ran on the fake wage discrepancy.
If Trump isn't going to do anything about SJW madness, why is he the answer here?
That's what people don't realize about the Sessions spat. Trump is looking to push Sessions out because he's not pursuing the swamp monsters (Debbie Wasserman, Clintons, etc). To get real change in Washington, one of these over grown monstrosities has got to do prison time. Imagine if Hillary Clinton got a 10 year sentence for mishandling intelligence or obstruction? That swamp monsters would flee (like Debbie Wasserman's IT guy), or they would change their ways.
Sessions needs to be out because he's too passive. We need some head knockers to change things around.
If Trump isn't going to do anything about SJW madness, why is he the answer here?
Today's remarks on the military not being a place for trannies is a good start.
Sessions needs to be out because he's too passive. We need some head knockers to change things around.
Also because he seems focused on benefiting the prison industry by aggressively prosecuting marijuana usage. Makes me suspect he's getting some kind of financial or political kickback for that. Marijuana is truly the least of America's problems.
If Trump isn't going to do anything about SJW madness, why is he the answer here?
Today's remarks on the military not being a place for trannies is a good start.
Sessions needs to be out because he's too passive. We need some head knockers to change things around.
Also because he seems focused on benefiting the prison industry by aggressively prosecuting marijuana usage. Makes me suspect he's getting some kind of financial or political kickback for that. Marijuana is truly the least of America's problems.
I couldn't agree more Patrick, er I mean 1. Today was a good start for putting SJW on notice.
As for marijuana, the only problem we have in this country with the herb is that it is too expensive and the supply is too limited. We need more Mary Jane!
And this comment comes from someone who has never inhaled.
Just think in a few years we could see Stuart Smalley in the Senate with Kid Rock the Majority leader and THE ROCK as commander in chief!
I couldn't agree more Patrick, er I mean 1. The only problem we have in this country with Marijuana is that it is too expensive and the supply is too limited. We need more Mary Jane!
I'm not saying that smoking pot is a virtue, but as a vice, it's definitely minor. Less harmful than alcohol.
I couldn't agree more Patrick, er I mean 1. The only problem we have in this country with Marijuana is that it is too expensive and the supply is too limited. We need more Mary Jane!
I'm not saying that smoking pot is a virtue, but as a vice, it's definitely minor. Less harmful than alcohol.
Cannabis oils are less harmful than excessive alcohol, but smoking is bad for your lungs and cardiovascular system. I don't think even smoking in moderation is a good idea.
Also because he seems focused on benefiting the prison industry by aggressively prosecuting marijuana usage. Makes me suspect he's getting some kind of financial or political kickback for that. Marijuana is truly the least of America's problems.
I agree. I honestly don't care about Marijuana, and believe it should be legalized. It makes no sense to have alcohol legal, but ban Weed. Legalizing it would also have the effect of cutting the legs off the Mexican drug cartels, and the more they are bled dry, the better.
The AG should be concentrating getting people like Loretta Lynch, Clinton, or Holder into prison so the rest of the swamp gets put on notice.
There's no way the M1 Abrams can take on the T14 Armata with only one fixed gear...
Today's remarks on the military not being a place for trannies is a good start
Just like high tax Democrats worked out so well with Illinois and Michigan?
« First « Previous Comments 37 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
http://www.dailywire.com/news/18899/kid-rock-leading-michigan-senate-poll-hank-berrien#
Looks like Michigan is going to be even harder for Democrats to take back. Decades of economic ruin under Democrat rule have given the GOP a huge boost in the state which turned red in November 2016.