« First « Previous Comments 81 - 120 of 265 Next » Last » Search these comments
I can understand and make simple sentences. My vocabulary is too small. That’s always been my problem.
My french vocabulary is only big enough for me not to order four soups.
I'm still waiting for the arcane reference to both Nietzsche and Goedels in the same comment. Turn your script back on, much more fun.
I like to think that all races ought to be equal. I am a "speciesist" though.
If so, what makes you think that a wolf doesn’t think the same way?
A wolf does not think.
That is very presumptuous.
Perhaps. The wolf is welcomed to disprove my claim on this blog.
If our model of the brain based on interconnection of neurons is correct, the human brain is a Turing Machine.
I think the brain is responsible for sensary and motor functions. The brain can process information. But it cannot think.
Thought requires the psyche.
I think that anyone who has ever watched a pack of animals hunt can see that they think.
When they start wondering why they are hunting, they are thinking. Or should I say free-thinking.
Self-awareness could not possibly have come from evolutionary processes.
It’s tough to explain.
It is impossible to explain. Most children have better self-awareness and are better free-thinkers because they are not exposed to science yet.
It is sad that our intuition is highly suppressed in today's world.
It looks like elephants can recognize themselves in mirrors, is that thought?
No. It can only be shown that elephants appear to recognize themselves in mirrors.
We should be cautioned that science is an excellent propaganda tool. Many activists are dying to show that animals are sentient beings.
Sheesh, CG gets called a trollbot for touching on too many topics, but try as I might, my comments on Japanese kitchen knifes and obscure plant hunters gets no more than an occasional nod from SP and Peter P.
I feel neglected - I'm a baaaad trollbot.
I feel neglected - I’m a baaaad trollbot.
Don't feel neglected... we all love you.
CG is real enough, I'm pretty sure Randy H is just teasing. I still don't comprehend the Fudan to Yale comparison, but his oddities sound real enough to me.
Perhaps I'm more forgiving to CG because I think in similar pathways. I'm pretty sure I have undiagnosed ADD...
Muggy,
Is that ASCII code? I am too lazy to decipher.
It reads in ascii
'Knock it the fuck off, ouyay eeksgay'
Perhaps I’m more forgiving to CG because I think in similar pathways.
Funny, I think the same way.
I wish I was better at languages, then I’d take a stab at Gaelic…
Did you mean Garlic?
"Did you mean Garlic?"
Only when I sight Dick Cheney in the horizon...
Peter P was captured on film at a blog party, so we have to assume he is indeed fueled by sushi and arugula.
You all need to tune in to the forsakencraft radio show on the air now. Will be interviewing Casey Serin live...yes I know you all want to hear what that weasle has to say.
LOL!
But honestly, he sounds quite like quite a few Shanghai born guys I know.
He must be built for a pretty specialized market.
Oh yeah, Peter P is totally a foodbot, here to spread misinformation about astrology and vegetarians. He was probably produced by the sushi restaurant association in an effort to get people to pay $9 for a bite of fish.
(I computed that I just contradicted what I said 3 comments ago -- time to shut down and reboot)
I once tried - and failed - to pick a “fight†with him. It seems he even has a prime directive built in!
What is the point of fighting?
"What is the point of fighting?"
I don't know. Nowadays I just fight to make a point or create a tactical advantage or relieve boredom. It's hard to get enthusiastic about anger anymore. I think I spent all my anger and outrage on GOP circa 2000 to 2005.
I find people who embrace dumbness to be rather hypnotic. Maybe they're the ones who achieved enlightenment - not through knowledge but through complete emptiness.
I don’t like videos that cast people in dumb light. It’s just very mean.
I think the video link was directed towards me. Actually, it was quite funny. My wife may agree that I look like that sometime. :)
In my case, I am mostly moved by tragedies.
Same here!
But I also love dark comedies like Dr. Strangelove.
From tragedies, we can feel the deepest emotions concerning human weeknesses.
I envy linear thinkers...my boyfriend claims that he only thinks about problems on hand - apparently my mental habit of flowing from food to the economics of club DJs past the age of 35 to bad Goth novels is not a universal pattern.
Perhaps if I was a more disciplined thinker, I would be rich (or gained an avocation to catch a rich man) already.
I find most good tragedies to be quite funny and all good comedies to be quite touching (that includes Jay and Silent Bob Strikes Back - yes to good comedy and yes to touching).
glad you weren’t offended
It is not easy to offend me.
I envy linear thinkers…my boyfriend claims that he only thinks about problems on hand - apparently my mental habit of flowing from food to the economics of club DJs past the age of 35 to bad Goth novels is not a universal pattern.
I do too. I think/worry too much. :(
« First « Previous Comments 81 - 120 of 265 Next » Last » Search these comments
Patrick.net was featured in a SFGate.com article today. We all saw Ben Jones' blog featured in Business Week. According to author Carol Lloyd, NPR has been snooping around here for sources to interview (although that's yet to be verified, if you've been emailed or called by an NPR researcher/reporter, let us know).
What is the real impact of Bubble Blogs? Undeniably, blogs in general have quickly become established as a powerful alternate form of media. But blogs as a source of information are also often criticized for being raw, unedited, and often biased or outright inaccurate. It's even possible to find self-proclaimed internet curmudgeons criticizing blogs and bloggers in a blog.
Has this blog, and the other pioneers which took on the growing insanity of the real-estate bubble, really had a meaningful impact? I still maintain that blogs only affect the wider public sentiment on the margins. Most people do not receive their information through blogs. Those who still read consume simplified infografix color newspapers, the rest figure it out from commercials they forget to skip while watching something they Tivo'd. But, maybe affecting the margins is all that really matters. If we've helped to turn the few in the front of the herd, then the rest will follow.
Finally, what about anonymity? The largest single criticism leveled at blogs, and increasingly at Bubble Blogs, is that all the resident "experts" and "pundits" are anonymous. Anonymity breeds lack of accountability, and questions motives. Of course we aren't all anonymous. Certainly Patrick, Ben and others aren't. Some regular contributors and authors aren't either. But does it even really matter? I am not anonymous, yet I've been accused of being a real estate industry shill, despite the fact anyone can read my resume online. So I'm not so sure it truly makes a difference.
What do you think? Are we helping, hurting, or just fooling ourselves?
--
(Suggestion for thread by FormerAptBroker (FAB), who, while anonymous, is verifiable by this blog's admins just like most of our regular contributors).
--Randy H
#housing