patrick.net

病理學家竟然不知道殺死接種疫苗的病原體刺突蛋白 学术審查的致命後果

The pathologist is surprisingly unaware of the deadly consequences of the academic review regarding the spike protein of pathogens that kill vaccinated individuals.

——一個

醫學期刊的後果

審查

我最近見到了一位「系統」病理學家。 我們的談話揭示了一個令人不安的例子，即對「不方便的科學」進行巨大而普遍的審查的致命後果。

皮埃爾·科裡，醫學博士，MPA

Pathologists Are Unaware Of The Pathogen Killing The Vaccinated - A
Consequence Of Medical Journal
Censorship
I recently met with a "system" pathologist. Our conversation revealed a disturbing example of the deadly consequence of the immense and pervasive censorship of "inconvenient science."
PIERRE KORY, MD, MPA
14 JUN 2024 AT 15:08

https://open.substack.com/pub/pierrekory/p/pathologists-are-unaware-of-the-pathogen

I was at a group dinner a few months ago with a lot of “normies” (people unawake/unaware of the vaccine catastrophe as well as the many other fraudulent facets of our government/Pharma Covid response). Most were vaccinated - not a group I am often a part of or invited to in these last years.
Anyway, a Board-certified pathologist was there and we were “talking shop” regarding Covid, its treatment etc. He knew I was an “expert” in Covid science and therapeutics, and as we were talking, I just couldn’t help myself. I blurted out a question, “In your practice, are you guys routinely staining for the spike protein in your autopsies and/or tumor and skin biopsies?” His answer:

“What is the spike protein? Is that something to do with vaccination or something? I don’t understand what people’s problems are with the vaccine, all I know is that the vaccinated are sick for 2 days while the unvaccinated are sick for 2 weeks.”

Lets ignore most of that insanely ignorant answer and instead focus on the fact he is a pathologist, meaning his specialty is in identifying “pathogens.” A pathogen is any organism or agent that can produce disease. Pathologists are trained to identify abnormal changes in cells, tissues, and organs by examining samples obtained through biopsies, autopsies, or other procedures. Besides looking for gross, overt changes (atherosclerostic plaques, clots, infarcted tissues, dissected vessels etc, they also look for organisms, foreign bodies, and/or accumulations of cell types to detect inflammation and/or cancer.
One of the main ways that pathologists identify pathogens is by placing tissue samples on a microscope slide and then they apply a special dye or “stain” to the tissue and examine it under a microscope. They have innumerable stains which are designed to adhere to only the pathogen or cell of interest. If the pathogen or cell is not present in the tissue, no dye is taken up. If the organism or cell type is highly present it will pick up the colored stain and become easy to identify within tissues.
Based on the pathologists’ answer above, it became painfully clear to me that the global suppression of the science showing that the spike protein is a highly toxic and lethal pathogen (and the product of bioweapons research) has been shockingly successful. How did “they” pull this off? In my opinion, there were four main tactics or dynamics which led to this calamity:

Regulatory agencies across the world reversed the long-standing practice of considering any death or injury reportedly associated with a novel therapy to be considered caused by the therapy until proven otherwise. With the mRNA vaccines, agencies across the world instead immediately dismissed all reports of death and injury as unrelated until proven causative.

Coroners across the world (note they are all pathologists), with rare exceptions, have systematically avoided “staining for the spike protein” in autopsies. This has prevented them from determining the actual cause of death. As my dear friend and colleague Dr. Ryan Cole (a pathologist) has repeatedly said, “You can’t find what you are not looking for.”

Coroners across the world (note they are all pathologists), with rare exceptions, have systematically avoided “staining for the spike protein” in autopsies. This has prevented them from determining the actual cause of death. As my dear friend and colleague Dr. Ryan Cole (a pathologist) has repeatedly said, “You can’t find what you are not looking for.”

The high impact medical journals censored and/or retracted any studies which performed comprehensive data analyses showing the widespread catastrophic effects of the vaccines (see next post for a detailed review of these unprecedented retractions). Interestingly, medical journals instead allowed the publications of individual case reports by the thousands (an unprecedented number of over 3,600 at my last count). However nearly every single publication describes the adverse event or death as “rare, very rare, or as yet unreported” while at the same time always including a sentence reminding the reader that the vaccines have been deemed “safe, effective, and have saved millions of lives.” What a world.

Mainstream news outlets were paid to willfully carry out the massive propaganda campaign of “safe and effective” while censoring and/or avoiding any mentions of injuries or death.

The actions above have caused widespread suppression of the evidence for the toxicity and lethality of the mRNA platform, and in particular, the spike protein as the pathogen itself. If you assume all deaths are unrelated to the vaccine or spike protein, and you make sure no pathologists can repeatedly prove cause by staining for spike in the autopsy specimens, you can create a situation where all the many thousands of reports of unexpected and sudden deaths are simply considered “tragic mysteries”and “unfortunate or rare occurrences.” Cue Ed Dowd’s aptly titled book, “Cause Unknown:”

Now, lets get to the point of this post. Fortunately, there have been a couple of renegade pathologists who appropriately investigated the unexpected deaths to try to identify whether the vaccine caused it. The most public were Drs. Arne Burkhart and Sucharit Bhakti from Germany and Dr. Ryan Cole here in the U.S. Despite Dr. Bakhti being retired, he was one of the most outspoken and has endured numerous attacks as a result (don’t read his Wikipedia page). Dr. Cole has unsurprisingly endured numerous attacks against his license and his business (insurance plans dropped him which forced him to sell his practice). Dr. Burkhart is now dead. He apparently died while swimming in a lake. No further comment.
Anyway, before Burkhart’s death, he performed autopsies and/or reviewed autopsy specimens using stains for the spike protein. He did this for families who consulted him with the belief that the vaccines caused their loved one’s death.
Burkharts’ findings are the most public because he gave lectures at several well publicized Covid conferences. One of the most memorable was at a conference in Sweden in January of 2023 that I also lectured at. We were all in awe of both him (smart, expert, kind, friendly) and his lecture.
He reported on 51 autopsies that he and his team performed secondary investigations of. In each case, the families consulted his team because they suspected the vaccine had caused their loved ones death. Note the local coroner had not stained for spike protein.

……

He also performed biopsies of four live patients, one of whom was a former marathon runner who developed severe circulatory problems after the vaccine. Look at the patchy white areas of her feet which represent areas of poor to no blood flow that results from vessel occlusion and destruction as above. Apparently her feet become so painful she often cannot walk.

They also examined one of the nasty “fibrous white clots” that have been extensively reported on by embalmers and funeral home directors that started showing in early 2021 after the rollout of the vaccine campaign.
Funeral home Director Richard Hirschman and Retired U.S Air Force Major Thomas Haviland have been some of the most instrumental in trying to get this information known to the public (can’t forget to mention Anna Foster and funeral home directors John O'Loone and Chad Whisnat). The best and most detailed review of the data they have compiled from surveys of embalmers can be found in AMD’s article here. A recent tweet from Hirschman just last week:
…

幾個月前，我和很多「正常人」（人們不清醒/不知道疫苗災難以及我們政府/製藥公司應對新冠病毒的許多其他欺詐方面）參加了一個集體晚宴。 大多數人都接種了疫苗——不是我過去幾年經常加入或被邀請加入的群體。

無論如何，一位董事會認證的病理學家在那裡，我們正在「談論」新冠病毒、其治療等。 他知道我是新冠病毒科學和治療方面的「專家」，當我們交談時，我忍不住了。 我脫口而出，「在你們的實踐中，你們是否經常在屍檢和/或腫瘤和面板活檢中染色尖峰蛋白？」 他的回答：

「尖峰蛋白是什麼？ 這和接種疫苗有什麼關係嗎？ 我不明白人們對疫苗有什麼問題，我只知道接種疫苗的人病了2天，而未接種疫苗的人病了2周。」

讓我們忽略大多數瘋狂無知的答案，而是專注於他是一名病理學家，這意味著他的專長是識別「病原體」。 病原體是任何能產生疾病的生物體或病原體。 病理學家接受培訓，透過檢查透過活檢、屍檢或其他程式獲得的樣本來識別細胞、組織和器官的異常變化。 除了尋找明顯的、明顯的變化（動脈粥樣硬化斑塊、凝塊、梗死組織、解剖血管等）外，他們還尋找生物體、異物和/或細胞型別的積累來檢測炎症和/或癌症。

病理學家識別病原體的主要方法之一是將組織樣本放在顯微鏡載玻片上，然後在組織上塗抹特殊染料或「汙漬」，並在顯微鏡下檢查。 它們有無數的汙漬，旨在只粘附在病原體或感興趣的細胞上。 如果組織中不存在病原體或細胞，則不會被帶走染料。 如果生物體或細胞型別高度存在，它將拾取有色汙漬，並在組織中變得容易識別。

根據上述病理學家的回答，我痛苦地清楚地表明，全球對科學的壓制表明尖峰蛋白是一種高毒性和致命的病原體（也是生物武器研究的產物）取得了驚人的成功。 「他們」是怎麼做到的？ 在我看來，有四種主要策略或動態導致了這場災難：

世界各地的監管機構扭轉了長期的做法，即將任何與新療法相關的死亡或傷害視為由該療法引起，直到證明相反。 有了mRNA疫苗，世界各地的機構反而立即駁回了所有死亡和受傷的報告，認為這些報告與死亡和傷害無關，直到被證明是因果關係。

世界各地的化管病學家（注意他們都是病理學家），除了極少數例外，在屍檢中系統地避免了「尖峰蛋白染色」。 這阻止了他們確定實際死因。 作為我親愛的朋友和同事，博士 Ryan Cole（病理學家）反覆說：「你找不到你不要找的東西。」

高影響力的醫學期刊審查和/或撤回了任何進行全面資料分析的研究，這些研究顯示疫苗的廣泛災難性影響（有關這些前所未有的撤回的詳細審查，請參閱下一篇文章）。 有趣的是，醫學期刊反而允許出版數千份個人病例報告（根據我上次的統計，這個數字是前所未有的，超過3600個）。 然而，幾乎每份出版物都將不良事件或死亡描述為「罕見、非常罕見或尚未報告」，同時總是包含一個句子，提醒讀者疫苗被認為是「安全、有效，並拯救了數百萬人的生命」。 多麼一個世界啊。

主流新聞機構獲得報酬，故意開展「安全有效」的大規模宣傳活動，同時審查和/或避免提及任何傷害或死亡。

上述行動導致mRNA平臺毒性和致死性的證據被廣泛壓制，特別是作為病原體本身的尖峰蛋白。 如果你假設所有死亡都與疫苗或尖峰蛋白無關，並且你確保沒有病理學家可以透過在屍檢標本中染色尖峰來反覆證明原因，你可以造成數千份意外和突然死亡的報告被簡單地認為是「悲慘的謎團」和「不幸或罕見的事件」。 Cue Ed Dowd的題名恰當的書《原因未知》：

現在，讓我們進入這個帖子的重點。 幸運的是，有幾個叛逆的病理學家適當地調查了意外死亡，試圖確定是否是疫苗造成的。 最公眾的是博士。 來自德國的Arne Burkhart和Sucharit Bhakti以及博士 Ryan Cole在美國。 儘管博士 Bakhti退休後，他是最直言不諱的人之一，因此遭受了無數次攻擊（不要看他的維基百科頁面）。 博士 不出所料，科爾忍受了針對他的執照和業務的多次攻擊（保險計劃使他放棄，迫使他出售他的業務）。 博士 Burkhart現在已經死了。 他顯然在湖裡游泳時死了。 沒有進一步的評論。

無論如何，在Burkhart去世之前，他使用尖峰蛋白染色進行了屍檢和/或複查標本。 他這樣做是為了那些向他諮詢並相信疫苗導致親人死亡的家庭。

Burkharts的發現是最公開的，因為他在幾次廣為宣傳的新冠肺炎會議上發表了演講。 最難忘的一次是2023年1月在瑞典舉行的一次會議上，我也在會上講課。 我們都對他（聰明、專家、善良、友好）和他的演講感到敬畏。

他報告了他和他的團隊對51份屍檢進行了二次調查。 在每種情況下，家屬都諮詢了他的團隊，因為他們懷疑疫苗導致了他們親人的死亡。 請注意，當地的科羅納員沒有染上尖峰蛋白。
…

他還對四名活體患者進行了活檢，其中一人是前馬拉松運動員，在接種疫苗後出現了嚴重的迴圈問題。 看看她腳上斑駁的白色區域，這些區域代表著血管閉塞和破壞導致的血液流動不良或沒有的區域，如上所述。 顯然，她的腳變得如此疼痛，以至於她經常無法走路。

他們還檢查了防腐人員和殯儀館主任廣泛報道的一種討厭的「纖維狀白凝塊」，該凝塊在疫苗活動推出後於2021年初開始出現。

殯儀館主任Richard Hirschman和退役的美國空軍少校Thomas Haviland在試圖讓公眾瞭解這一資訊方面發揮了最大作用（不能忘記提到Anna Foster和殯儀館主任John O'Loone和Chad Whisnat）。 他們從防腐調查中彙編的資料的最佳和最詳細的審查可以在AMD的文章中找到。 就在上週，Hirschman最近發了一條推文：