patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,360,902 comments by 15,735 users - Maga_Chaos_Monkey, Robert Sproul online now
Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Search these comments
1
Ceffer
2025 Oct 1, 6:19pm
Ceffer
2025 Oct 1, 6:19pm
Yeah, I hate posters that do that. I think. Maybe.
Could you repeat that in party of the first part and party of the second part language? Maybe I hate myself. That's some nifty legwork. I can see that Trump has trained you well.
Could you repeat that in party of the first part and party of the second part language? Maybe I hate myself. That's some nifty legwork. I can see that Trump has trained you well.
3
SharkyP
2025 Oct 4, 3:30am
SharkyP
2025 Oct 4, 3:30am
I always find something interesting on Patrick.net. Ashamedly I knew nothing of the Frankests. Who knows if this is on target?
https://www.porges.net/Frankists.html#ylf
https://www.porges.net/Frankists.html#ylf
Asking
(Leading)
Questions
If Addressed by Other party--Claim they're trying to bully you into silence.
If Addressed in depth by other Party - Claim that they failed to refute your conjecture by using their response to reverse the burden of evidence, and that their long, detailed response is actually evidence they did it, despite having no positive evidence that they did it.
If Disinvited or told to stop--Claim you're being deplatformed and silenced.
If Asked for Evidence - Claim your interlocutor is trying to bury the truth; ignore demands for actual evidence or provenance of text wall jpgs while making more conjecture and assertions based on feelings and arguments from intuition and incredulity.