patrick.net

Which begs the question, who has standing to prosecute voter fraud. All of Trumps lawsuits were dismissed as well, the majority of them were dismissed for “lack of standing.”

PeopleUnited says

Which begs the question, who has standing to prosecute voter fraud. All of Trumps lawsuits were dismissed as well, the majority of them were dismissed for “lack of standing.”

You know how people get kicked off from YouTube, FaceBook, and Twitter for "violating terms and services", and really that's just a complete lie, and they aren't violating anything, they are just saying something the company doesn't like?

The people who "don't have standing", are in the same boat.

You should ask yourself "why doesn't anybody ask the court to clarify who has standing"? The first part of a government that goes corrupt, is the judiciary.

richwicks says

The first part of a government that goes corrupt, is the judiciary.

Yes, because ethe thugs only have to threaten one man.

richwicks says

"why doesn't anybody ask the court to clarify who has standing"? The first part of a government that goes corrupt, is the judiciary.

There are several potential answers to the question. The most likely answer and if we were lawyers we probably would already understand this: no one has standing. The court seems to have determined that when an election official counts a vote, when an election auditor certifies an election, there is no standing for anyone to question the results. Which means a corrupt election official or auditor can do what they want and there is no recourse to hold them accountable. You can demand a recount but even that can be faked/fraudulent and there is literally nothing anyone can do about it. In practice this is exactly what happened. And honestly we Don’t want judges deciding elections anyway. So what we need is to put honest people in charge of elections.

PeopleUnited says

And honestly we Don’t want judges deciding elections anyway.

I agree with what you said but we must have recourse to identify bad behavior, and that IMO is the courts. They don't decide elections but can interpret if the laws were broken.

They can also send them back to recount votes, or to get state reps to handle it or call for a new election if it's fubar.

porkchopXpress says

PeopleUnited says

And honestly we Don’t want judges deciding elections anyway.

I agree with what you said but we must have recourse to identify bad behavior, and that IMO is the courts. They don't decide elections but can interpret if the laws were broken.

I think a better way to say it is the courts should have the jurisdiction to encourage states, and individuals to follow the laws. But here is the catch, the federal government should not tell any state how to count their votes. That is a states right to determine how it will do so. So we really need honest people counting the votes! It is the most important thing to fair elections.

PeopleUnited says

I think a better way to say it is the courts should have the jurisdiction to encourage states, and individuals to follow the laws. But here is the catch, the federal government should not tell any state how to count their votes.

I don't know. The Federal government maybe should have intervention if, for example, an election is clearly stolen. However, since the Federal government is overlooking stolen elections...

The duty of the Federal government is to make certain the states follow and enforce the Constitution, however, our Federal government itself is refusing to enforce the Constitution. Therefore, our Federal government should be disbanded. It no longer serves a purpose.

The federal government is made of people just like state and local governments. When the people stop following the law, we have lawlessness. That is where we are today.

But you won’t like the government that replaces the current government. It will be more brutal, less honest and corrupt to the core. There will be no born again Christians in the new government. The world will have just experienced the most dramatic events in human history with millions of people worldwide disappearing into thin air in a blink of an eye, millions and millions of Christians and children gone. The world will clamor for answers and an assurance that this was just a one time thing and nobody else is going to disappear. They will demand to know where their kids and loved ones have gone. Someone will tell a story, a false narrative, and many will believe it. But God said this would happen, so when it does anyone who is not a believer better change their mind quick, before it is too late. The devil’s greatest trick is convincing people he doesn’t exist.

personal

Bring it on, burn it down. All I'm lacking now is belt-fed auto weapons and a field of yams.

richwicks says

What fucking bollocks. So sick of "it'll be worse if you let it change!"

What? Will I have an unelected president who is openly selling bribes whose son is a crackhead and a fake artist or something?

Agreed. It's already worse, chances are high it will be better. Gotta take a chance

stereotomy says

Bring it on, burn it down. All I'm lacking now is belt-fed auto weapons and a field of yams.

FACE! IT'S WHAT'S FOR DINNER!

stereotomy says

Bring it on, burn it down. All I'm lacking now is belt-fed auto weapons and a field of yams.

Hope you like face, it’s what’s for dinner!

just_passing_through says

stereotomy says

Bring it on, burn it down. All I'm lacking now is belt-fed auto weapons and a field of yams.

FACE! IT'S WHAT'S FOR DINNER!

O man, beat me to it!

In all seriousness though, calling someone a coward for stating the facts that we are never going to have a more honest, stable, fair government than the one we have now is the height of stupidity, ignorance and wishful thinking. There is no evidence to suggest there has been or ever will be a greater form of government than the American system based in the Declaration of Independence and bill of Rights. If you burn down the constitution and the government that it empowers you will inherit a nightmare worse than you can imagine. Bank on it.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/how-big-pharma-blocks-accountability

In an instant and with no warning about what was coming, Paxton had to pack up his things, was blocked from doing his duties, and was forced to step aside from the office that the people had three times elected him to hold.

Last week, he was exonerated of all charges and his name was fully cleared. Hardly anyone can even explain what the charges were. From a distance, it sure looked like a big political takedown attempt, but why?

Paxton just sat for an extended interview with Tucker Carlson, who now runs the planet’s most-watched show, which appears on X, formerly Twitter, and has no advertisers at all. In one portion of the interview, Mr. Paxton explained that three weeks before the impeachment, he had initiated an investigation against the COVID-19 vaccine makers for engaging in deceptive trade practices under the laws of Texas.

I recall being very excited about this at the time as a hugely important step. At the national level, the vaccine manufacturers are completely indemnified against liability from harms, which are plenty and also well-documented. Millions were forced to have this product injected into their bodies, and when something goes wrong, there's no one to sue. It isn't the way we are supposed to do business in America.

Paxton was all over the case and ready to start a serious inquiry.

“As soon as I did that,” he told Mr. Carlson, “that blew up my world. I became a target of Big Pharma, Big Tech, and obviously the Biden administration.”

Mr. Carlson then asked him why that would be the case.

“Big Pharma gives a lot of money. ... I was doing it because the federal government has this immunity for them. This is wrong," Paxton said. "They didn’t test this thing. They didn’t tell us about the side effects. They had an obligation to test it, even if they weren’t liable.

"They had an obligation to tell my people there are some risks here. You should decide but here are the risks. Instead, they said everything is good, it prevents it, you won’t spread it. None of that was true. That’s a deceptive trade practice. If they did that ...”

Mr. Carlson interrupts and says, “It seems like they did that.”

Then. Mr. Paxton says he will know more in the coming weeks and months, because he's picking up the case again. He should watch his back.

We need to be clear on what might be going on here. A state attorney general merely decided to apply existing law to the vaccine makers who provide most of the revenue to the drug approval side of the Food and Drug Administration. They fund 75 percent of television advertising and have moles embedded at all the commanding heights.

They are so powerful that they manage to get Congress and the president to grant them full freedom from liability for any of the effects of a vaccine. That only incentivized the firms to call gene therapy a vaccine even though it didn’t work like any vaccine in history.

How can it be possible that such tax-funded corporate agents, which own the patents to their drugs, and can even force their product on unwilling customers, can unseat a duly elected official in a state? It’s amazing ... and terrifying.

But that might be only the start of it. Mr. Carlson’s show on Fox was canceled just after he started asking hard questions about the vaccine, while Russell Brand was smeared the world over as he started to raise questions. It’s happened to many public figures.

Look at the unseating of the founder of Project Veritas’s James O’Keefe, which occurred after he exposed a Pfizer employee bragging about how much money the company would make by creating new strains of viruses against which they can vaccinate. It was easily the most spectacular exposé of the institution’s history—and then, boom, he was fired.

Now, Mr. O’Keefe runs his own outfit that continues to chase down pharma executives.

As for Project Veritas, it just pulled the plug and fired all but a few employees. It has ceased operations, which isn't surprising. When you get rid of the highest-performing person, the fumes you are left with don’t last long.

Think about it: This awesome operation was wrecked because some powerful people got squeamish about exposing the vaccine makers.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the biggest and most learned critic of Big Pharma on the planet, faced what might have been an assassination attempt last week. It didn’t even make the newspapers (The Epoch Times excepted). Meanwhile, he's still being denied Secret Service protection even though he's a serious candidate and faces non-stop threats on his life.

As president of Brownstone Institute, I see examples several times a day of what happens to doctors, professors, statisticians, or anyone who asks questions about this industry, which somehow has emerged as among the most powerful in U.S. politics. The dirty dealings of the industry in canceling critics are legion. Any study that questions the effectiveness, safety, or necessity of their products is nearly always rejected by the mainstream journals. Even letters to the editor that expose statistical errors end up in the dustbin.

As for Big Tech, they too are fully beholden. We have ironclad proof that Facebook and Twitter blocked any posts critical of vaccines. They went so far as to block “true information” about vaccine side effects that might contribute to an environment of “vaccine hesitancy.”

We must ask again: How did Big Pharma buy control of so many governments?

At this point, this problem has become a genuine threat to democracy and freedom. No industry has greater power to extract tax funding of its operations, retain intellectual property control over the results, enjoy indemnity from harms, and then even force its products on consumers. This is indefensible.

Any warrior who dares stand up to this deserves the support of everyone who believes in what was the American system.

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/09/exclusive-ken-paxton-files-criminal-complaints-texas-house-impeachment-managers-reports-crimes/

Ken Paxton Files Criminal Complaints Against House Impeachment Managers, Reports Crimes

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-files-lawsuit-against/

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Files Lawsuit Against Biden Regime for Cutting Razor Wire at the Southern Border: ‘This is Illegal’

https://thefederalist.com/2023/10/31/texas-republicans-failed-impeachment-of-ken-paxton-offers-a-glimpse-into-the-gops-intra-party-feuds/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/texas-ag-ken-paxton-says-biden-clearly-partnership/

Texas AG Ken Paxton Says Biden ‘Clearly in Partnership’ with Human Trafficking Cartels