Durham seeing the tenacity of Gaetz, Greene, and Jordan, tries to exonerate himself from his 4 long years of protecting the coup against Donald Trump, and his own Treason
invite response
2023 May 15, 2:56pm 3,921 views 61 comments
« First « Previous Comments 52 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
53
Patrick
2023 May 19, 8:56pm
Patrick
2023 May 19, 8:56pm
https://slaynews.com/news/fbi-blocked-4-criminal-investigations-into-clintons-durham-report-reveals/
According to the bombshell findings in Durham’s report, the FBI’s leaders blocked and shut down four criminal investigations into the Clintons.
54
Ceffer
2023 May 19, 10:23pm
Ceffer
2023 May 19, 10:23pm
You need an explosion for a bomb shell. These are stage lights for gloating for these loathsomes getting away with every depraved treason and subversion in the books.
56
Ceffer
2023 May 22, 10:21am
Ceffer
2023 May 22, 10:21am
Polls are propaganda chaff to confuse and steer your information radar. Fabricating charts and assertion stats is easy. Gathering real information is tortuous, labor intensive, slow and tedious
58
richwicks
2023 May 22, 2:57pm
richwicks
2023 May 22, 2:57pm
Ceffer says
Yes, it's especially difficult when people don't check sources, don't provide sources, and pass it on anyway without review to make EVERYBODY ELSE do these things.
And then you're battling everybody else that doesn't bother to verify or check, and they pass it on, and then other people pass it on, all the while when 1% are actually doing the work, and by the time that 1% proves it's bullshit, then it's weeks, months, years, even decades to disprove it.
For example, this:
https://twitter.com/politblogme/status/1585943973935185920?ref_src=patrick.net
There's no evidence Raskin said this, although Carlson reported it. I can't find it anywhere. No video of it, no transcript of it. No date, it's 99.9% likely to be false.
And our "news" does this all the fucking time. I'm used to that, what vexes me, is that people do this as well.
I caught it, because it sounded unbelievable to me, and it was. This is probably REAL Russian propaganda, and our "news" just passed it off as fact.
Polls are propaganda chaff to confuse and steer your information radar. Fabricating charts and assertion stats is easy. Gathering real information is tortuous, labor intensive, slow and tedious
Yes, it's especially difficult when people don't check sources, don't provide sources, and pass it on anyway without review to make EVERYBODY ELSE do these things.
And then you're battling everybody else that doesn't bother to verify or check, and they pass it on, and then other people pass it on, all the while when 1% are actually doing the work, and by the time that 1% proves it's bullshit, then it's weeks, months, years, even decades to disprove it.
For example, this:
https://twitter.com/politblogme/status/1585943973935185920?ref_src=patrick.net
There's no evidence Raskin said this, although Carlson reported it. I can't find it anywhere. No video of it, no transcript of it. No date, it's 99.9% likely to be false.
And our "news" does this all the fucking time. I'm used to that, what vexes me, is that people do this as well.
I caught it, because it sounded unbelievable to me, and it was. This is probably REAL Russian propaganda, and our "news" just passed it off as fact.
61
Patrick
2023 Jun 20, 9:06pm
Patrick
2023 Jun 20, 9:06pm
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/festival-joys-tuesday-june-20-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=129706419&isFreemail=true
Oh really?
After releasing his blockbuster report widely condemning the weaponized agencies, Durham is scheduled to testify in Congress this week. Specifically, his report delicately concluded that the Justice Department and the FBI had “failed to uphold their mission of strict fidelity to the law” by launching the ‘Russia-Gate’ probe against then President Trump.
Durham’s damning report explained there was “significant reliance on investigative leads provided or funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump’s political opponents,” particularly Hillary Clinton. Even worse, “The Department did not adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them, even when at about the same time the Director of the FBI and others learned of significant and potentially contrary intelligence.”
Most observers concluded the Durham report, as carefully worded as it was, exposed political weaponization within the federal law enforcement agencies.
Oh really?
« First « Previous Comments 52 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
What does that slimy cock sucker Durham do today. Oh he pipes up and releases the report that should have been released months before the 2020 elections. If everyone recalls his report was final but that Fuck Face Lard Ass William Barr said it wouldn't be released and perhaps it never will be.
But now with the walls closing in them all, it seems John Durham is thinking more about his pension he will lose and the possibility of him being fitted with a neck extension, which they all deserve.
Now we have got to be careful that he didn't release this report so that Merick and Wray can't stonewall everything now calling it an ongoing investigation.
This is proof that every leader in our DOJ needs to be impeached, and folks outside of DC investigate and the grand juries will need to also preside outside of Washington DC.