« First « Previous Comments 23 - 47 of 47 Search these comments
I think you guys are missing the point.
AI may not ever take over the world and make it into a dystopia.
It is, however, extremely disruptive to many many many industries.
ChatGPT showed how it could replace some lower tier writers. That’ll be true for programmers as well. This AI is evolving fast. Soon the output from the process will be indistinguishable from that of a competent writer/coder. And then it will be too far better for any human to ever catch up.
That will be the point at which we stop needing so many workers to keep things running and our population entertained. Why act out a drama when AI can write a better one and then use CGI to animate it in cartoon or live action?
When studios can use AI to pump out a new blockbuster every day, what’s the value of watching films?
When publishers can use AI to pump out new books every day, what’s the value in reading?
When software corps can use AI to write better code than ...
When software corps can use AI to write better code than any human can write, and write it so fast that instant updates are possible, what’s the point of programmers?
TPB, it doesn’t need to write perfect code. It just needs to be able to do all the boilerplate and uncomplicated code. If it can do take 90% of the effort off your plate, plus give helpful suggestions on the other 10%, then I can fire 90% of my coders and qa engineers.
Richwicks if you read some fiction you’d be better prepared to understand the unforeseeable before it happens to you.
TPB, it doesn’t need to write perfect code. It just needs to be able to do all the boilerplate and uncomplicated code.
More over when you replace one complex system or process with an even more sophisticated process. You always have to have qualified people to operate those systems.
what you described is no more earth shattering
I would definitely race it with my tools methods and script library that I have created and acquired over the years.
Once we had collected that data though - well now our AI model does in fact predict what would work and what won't accurately and nearly instantly (thanks rust!). In fact there are a lot of things we are now able to make we couldn't before.
Building anti cancer targeted therapies?
Just passing through, come on now, pinky swear you'll come back and man up and admit that we called it, when this fizzles and peters out.
I also suspect you're throwing new technologies into the lot of generalized AI discussions.
There are a lot of these being implemented in companies now that nobody discusses because just getting numbers back isn't sexy.
So how do you know those numbers aren't what you want, vs what you need?
« First « Previous Comments 23 - 47 of 47 Search these comments
The plan here is to brainwash idiots into letting AI usurp our courts and legislators, and AI can dish out adhoc laws and set Truth Speak to fit the narrative in real time.