« First « Previous Comments 81 - 101 of 101 Search these comments
No. The baby needed heart surgery and the parents did not want vaccinated blood, so a court took the baby away from the parents.
Fact is the parents were not aggressive enough if they truly wanted unvaccinated blood for whatever procedure. You don't ask... you TELL them what goes into your child. I have a friend, nurse, and she just trusted the doctors because she was in the field. Her kid would be 13 now, but is dead. Because doctors fucked up. They fuck up constantly. It's the last place I go outside of a broken bone. They're fucking idiots.
The parents were very agressive and they did in fact demand unvaccinated blood, so much so that a "New Zealand court took guardianship of baby..."
You are confusing two different cases. The child that died was in Washington state. There is another baby (fate unknown) in New Zealand.
richwicks says
You are confusing two different cases. The child that died was in Washington state. There is another baby (fate unknown) in New Zealand.
I provided a number of links to my posts and the links are consistent with my statements.
Besides, these are not the only victims of the vaccines. We have thousands!
The_Deplorable
I know, but the baby in NZ is not the baby the died. I'm not trying to jump down your throat or embarrass you, I'm just correcting you. No big deal, everybody makes mistakes.
I know, but the baby in NZ is not the baby the died.
Did you catch that?
Did you catch that?... nope, because you posted a picture instead of a link. POST THE LINK. a screenshot looks like fake news and should be ignored
Both sets of parents - one in New Zealand and the other in Spokane Washington were against their infant receiving vaccinated blood. Having the "New Zealand court taking guardianship of the baby" is not the answer and it does not make the vaccines and the vaccinated blood safe.
I completely agree with you... I agree, the parent's wishes should be paramount. It's THEIR child. And I will take this to insane lengths as well. I think parents that believe their "little girl" is really a "little boy" should be allowed to transition their child. I think this is a grave mistake, but they are the parents.
richwicks says
I completely agree with you... I agree, the parent's wishes should be paramount. It's THEIR child. And I will take this to insane lengths as well. I think parents that believe their "little girl" is really a "little boy" should be allowed to transition their child. I think this is a grave mistake, but they are the parents.
Be careful...
Here I draw the line because no one has the right - not even parents - to mutilate their child (this includes circumcision) or bypass nature in any way (transition). These are decisions the "child' needs to make when they reach 18.
I read recently that in Germany circumcisions are illegal.
The_Deplorable
I am not certain if there ever will be a backlash for this. The population is much more passive and cognitively impaired to this kind of thing than I ever would have imagined.
That baby has jaundice. Clots don't cause that. Something else was wrong with that child, especially if they needed blood for whatever condition.
« First « Previous Comments 81 - 101 of 101 Search these comments
Some good answers: