« First « Previous Comments 356 - 379 of 379 Search these comments
@RepThomasMassie
Nov 5
To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:
quit covering for pedophiles
put America before Israel
put farmers before corporations
quit funding wars abroad
reduce spending to control inflation
quit attacking independent voices

To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:
To avoid a repeat of last night’s shellacking in the 2026 midterms, Republicans should:
quit covering for pedophiles
put America before Israel
put farmers before corporations
quit funding wars abroad
reduce spending to control inflation
quit attacking independent voices

"he always votes against the Republican Party"
Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.
Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.
Patrick says
Massie votes with Republicans 91% of the time.
The Walls, Immigration, Tariffs. Kentucky needs a MAGA, not a RINO.
MAGA should mean MAGA. Not Trumps MIGA,
Alison Steinberg @alisonintheknow
of Lindell TV asked Thomas Massie if the house should vote to censure her after it was revealed by the Washington Post that Stacey Plaskett was texting with Jeffrey Epstein to influence her questions during 2019 hearings investigating Trump.
His answer was, “feels like a distraction.”
Massie just gave away the game:
This was never about the truth. This was always about finding an attack vector against Trump and Massie, as well as Marjorie Traitor Brown, either naively or intentionally went along with perpetuating this hoax that Trump is a p*do.
Primary them both.


MolotovCocktail says
MolotovCocktail says
MolotovCocktail says
Yawn: this will free up measly $750 million. Peanuts. Much ado about nothing.
this will free up measly $750 million
MolotovCocktail says
MolotovCocktail says
Yawn: this will free up measly $750 million. Peanuts. Much ado about nothing.


The total comes to approximately $1.47 trillion, with the US accounting for about two-thirds. Note that these were mid-year estimates for 2024; actual final spending for that year (now available in 2025) ended up slightly higher overall due to adjustments in some countries, but the chart faithfully reflects the data as released at the time
Estimated Total for NATO Operations in Europe
Combining the above, the direct US spending attributable to military presence and NATO-related operations in Europe is approximately $19.3 billion for FY2024 ($14.6B basing + $3.6B EDI + $1.1B common contributions). This represents about 2% of the US's total $968 billion defense spending (as per NATO estimates, which include broader categories like veterans' benefits and pensions not in the core DoD budget).Note that this is a conservative estimate focused on direct costs—additional indirect spending (e.g., global R&D, procurement of equipment deployable to Europe, or portions of the $25.7 billion in total Overseas Operations Costs that support EUCOM) could push the figure higher, potentially to $20-30 billion when accounting for shared overhead. However, the DoD does not provide a fully itemized regional total, and much of US defense spending benefits NATO globally rather than being Europe-specific.
« First « Previous Comments 356 - 379 of 379 Search these comments
_congressman