Comments 1 - 24 of 24 Search these comments
That sounds like desperation, not someone who is winning.
To be clear. If Ukraine loses, west is screwed.
We're screwed anyhow. Haven't you realized this yet? We're in a dictatorship.Correction: YOU are in a dictatorship. Earning bonus points.
richwicks saysWe're screwed anyhow. Haven't you realized this yet? We're in a dictatorship.Correction: YOU are in a dictatorship. Earning bonus points.
I'm never replacing Kiev for Kyiv or Lvov for L'viv. Not because I'm an asshole, but I don't hear any Germans saying "It's not Munich, it's Munchen! Never call it Munich!"To each their own. I'm surprised that you are making a point of it.
However. With all that's happening today, someone who sincerely believes in "civil war in Ukraine"
There's been civil war in Ukraine. US media even reported on it, but they are called "Russian separatists".Aaand, just like that, you believe US media. Doesn't take much, does it?
richwicks saysThere's been civil war in Ukraine. US media even reported on it, but they are called "Russian separatists".Aaand, just like that, you believe US media. Doesn't take much, does it?
What I respond to you - it's actually meant for others. I know who you are and I know that you don't care.
Also, you delete your comments.Bullshit. What do you remember that I said that you can no longer find?
Fucking Habera is a fucking nightmare."Fucking Habera" or "Fucking Bandera"? Make up your fucking mind!
richwicks saysAlso, you delete your comments.Bullshit. What do you remember that I said that you can no longer find?
You lie.
That's how I drew that conclusion, although it could be erroneous. It's certainly bizarre.Read my fucking handle.
richwicks saysThat's how I drew that conclusion, although it could be erroneous. It's certainly bizarre.Read my fucking handle.
Who do you think, I, supposedly am?You are either a propaganda troll, or someone who is sincere but gets his data from propaganda trolls. It's not just the talking points, but also synchronization of delivery. Too much coincidence. One or the other, on the receiving end there's no difference.
richwicks saysWho do you think, I, supposedly am?You are either a propaganda troll, or someone who is sincere but gets his data from propaganda trolls.
It's not just the talking points, but also synchronization of delivery.
T L Lips says
Putin is a statesman. He has a vision he lays out, takes hours of questions directly from the public - and most of them not 'boxer or brief?' fluffy questions, he's always willing to talk, when you fuck with him he punches back open and honestly.
Obama, like other Western leaders, is a technocratic managerial functionary...
When this topic was fresher, and interested me as a social phenomena, I'd ask a russian-speaking person the same question: "Who do you think took down MS-17?" The answer (which I didn't expect to be exact, yet it was in all but one cases) would usually do awesome job classifying the person and spare me from talking to lunatics.
First and foremost, Putin is a liar. Whether he's a sociopath by birth or managed to pull it off through training is irrelevant. The best way to "unhypnotize" yourself with regards to Putin is to watch him talking to media years ago about facts that are now common knowledge but weren't back then:
"is Russia planning military operation in Ukraine?" (2013)
"was it Russian military that blocked Ukrainian troops in Crimea?" (April 2014)
"who took down MS-17?" (oh, that's a good one, there is absolutely no way to invite that question without inviting another one, about presence of Russian military in Ukraine)
Now that we know the facts, you just can't perceive that "honest and straightforward" approach that he uses without disgust. However, it's also admirably convincing - neither Obama, nor Hillary, nor Trump come close.
I think that it's irrelevant whether or not Russia influenced the elections (because "influence" was in revealing info that public had the right to know in the first place) However, I'm more inclined to believe it because Putin denies it.
T L Lips says
Bellingcat. About as unbiased as Salon on the subject of 32 Genders.
Bellingcat, indeed. And your response is a textbook Ad Hominem.
The Chinese government has made clear that it will remain a strategic ally of Russia despite President Vladimir Putin being viewed globally as the aggressor in the war. Beijing dropped diplomatic ambiguity about its position by promoting Russia’s narrative, saying that the U.S. was responsible for the crisis. It also announced trade support to help Russia withstand sanctions.
As recently as Tuesday, the Biden administration was hoping that China might play a constructive role in preventing or mitigating the looming Ukraine crisis, or at least not obstruct efforts to defuse it. Secretary of State Antony Blinken called Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi seeking China’s support “to preserve Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price said. A Chinese Foreign Ministry statement said Wang responded by noting that “the situation in Ukraine is tending to deteriorate” and called for a resolution based on “dialogue and negotiation.”
The administration’s hopes were diminished when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying asserted Wednesday that the U.S. is “the culprit of current tensions surrounding Ukraine.” A day later, within hours of Russian forces moving into Ukraine, Wang unambiguously aligned China with Russia by telling Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that China “understands the Russian side's legitimate concerns on security issues” in Ukraine.
The synchronization with whom or what?With other trolls, indeed. On other resources. You exhibit same traits. 1) Laundry list of assertions, very passionate 2) Inability to logically defend them individually and therefore moving from one to another when challenged. 3) Repetition. Repetition. Repetition.
The link leads to "no post with this ID", so I don't know what you are talking about. Did I predict attack by Russia? Then I was obviously right. Why did it not happen sooner? I don't know. May be because we now have an old senile man in the WH. May be because Putler was using different drugs back then. May be because a deal with one of the shadow players hadn't yet finalized back then. Yet obviously, OBVIOUSLY the imminent invasion of Ukraine was imminent.
https://www.patrick.net/post/1300746/?comment_id=1362354
T L Lips being my old handle.
Interesting how this topic is the most of interest to you.
Note our exchange was about 5 years ago now, and in all that time the imminent invasion of Ukraine didn't happen.
Would you agree there is an incredible amount of social media and election manipulation WITH the biased cooperation of Social Media Tech Giants for or against certain causes or points of view?I would. So what? I'm not getting my info from them where it matters.
It was "The Dirty Dozen" that I was thinking of.
The Dirty Dozen was the war movie fought with hardened life serving convicts. Kelly's Heroes was about stealing Nazi Gold.