2
0

Supremes Tells CDC And Biden To Stick It


               
2021 Aug 27, 9:01am   251 views  5 comments

by mell   follow (12)  

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243397


Telling the highest court in the land that you are going to do something you believe is illegal doesn't usually end well.

It didn't this time.

It would be one thing if Congress had specifically authorized the action that the CDC has taken. But that has not happened. Instead, the CDC has imposed a nationwide moratorium on evictions in reliance on a decades-old statute that authorizes it to implement measures like fumigation and pest extermination.

Yep.

And just as occurred in Kentucky the premise of a unitary executive decision got thrown in the ash-can where it belongs.

This is also a clear warning to any attempt to impose any sort of national mandate -- for a vaccine or otherwise. Yes, the CDC and the government have the authority to quarantine actual infected people. But, as the Supreme Court made clear that cannot be speculative, exactly as was the case for the eviction moratorium. That someone might have Covid-19, and might cross a state line as a consequence of being evicted does not pass the statutory test which limits authority to actual, provable harm -- not speculative risk of a future event.

Pay heed Governors, Mayors and yes, the CDC and Biden.

You lost.

Twice.

The limit of the law is clear.

Now shut the ** up and sit down.

PS: Watch the /NAD part of the forum over the next few days. The data is shifting, as expected and even Justice Breyer, who dissented, managed to through his own stupidity out what's going to happen -- because it already is. Oops.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   mell   2021 Aug 27, 9:02am  

"This is also a clear warning to any attempt to impose any sort of national mandate -- for a vaccine or otherwise."

Some good news.
2   WookieMan   2021 Aug 27, 9:49am  

mell says
"This is also a clear warning to any attempt to impose any sort of national mandate -- for a vaccine or otherwise."

Some good news.

It's not legal. Violates 14A out the gate. I honestly think all judges would agree. We're just waiting for it to get there. Lawsuits really haven't started given this has been labeled a pandemic. It would have cost a shit ton or been career suicide last year for anyone involved. So no one did it. You can't sue big Pharma for this crap either. The lawsuits are coming though.
3   Tenpoundbass   2021 Aug 27, 9:57am  

The Supremes most likely have rental properties. I bet they will rule we have to wear three masks, get the vax every 6 months, and eventually Cities can foreclose your property for not enforcing social distance at your residence.

These are very Evil Scumbags with zero content in their souls.
4   porkchopXpress   2021 Aug 27, 10:03am  

WookieMan says
The lawsuits are coming though.
And not fast enough
5   Patrick   2021 Aug 27, 3:18pm  

https://twitter.com/Stalingrad_Poor/status/1431281274015023110#m


Stalingrad & Poorski
@Stalingrad_Poor
6h
What?

Gavin Newsom
@GavinNewsom
7h
Reminder: This does NOT impact California renters. The state’s eviction moratorium remains in effect.
3:43 PM · Aug 27, 2021


Stock Pumper in Chief
@CrashDavisInc
6h
Replying to @Stalingrad_Poor
It's true. Our Golden State deadbeats have until 10/1.

Ohlone Tactical
@OhloneTactical
6h
Replying to @Stalingrad_Poor
CA always thinks they are their own country

Polomvp888
@Polomvp888
6h
Replying to @Stalingrad_Poor
Its ok, he's leaving in 2 weeks then it will be void as the Supreme Court voted!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste