patrick.net

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/disband-the-cdc-goes-mainstream

"disband the CDC" goes mainstream
the reflexivity of the overton window

el gato malo




the CDC failed on virtually every measurable metric of covid response.

they promoted the pseudoscience of lockdowns and masking trotting out study after study with cherry picked or outright fraudulent parameters.

they made up ideas like “6 foot distancing” that lacked any basis whatsoever

they failed to recognize or admit to airborne and aerosol transmission

they pushed over-sensitive and irrelevant testing and fruitless and impossible contact tracing

they claimed vaccines would stop spread

they claimed vaccines would be 100% effective vs hospitalization and death

they pushed 2 doses and done as the “path to get your life back” then 3, then 4, then booster forever all on the basis of shoddy science.

and they systematically refused to do their appointed job of monitoring the adverse events of the vaccines.

they destroyed schools and businesses and drove the US economy and society into a ditch.

they made the lives of american children into a misery and cost them years of education and development despite their never having been at material risk.

they vilified and attacked the sane and accurate folks like jay and martin and sunetra and the great barrington declaration which was, quite literally, just a simple and uncontroversial elucidation of 100 years of evidence based epidemiology.

and now they have finally come full circle and tried to slide into adopting the practices that the actual adults in the room had been advising all along.

it took the CDC years to finally be pummeled into arriving at the place the great barrington declaration started back in fall 2020.

this absolute panoply of total, tragic, and willful failure has become way too big to miss.

this agency is either so outlandishly incompetent or so desperately politicized and corrupt as to pose grave threat to the american people especially and specifically because it was allowed to dictate to them (either directly or by informing the choices of those who did) and perhaps most of all because people trusted them.

Patrick says

https://rumble.com/v1fxz67-where-is-the-national-apology-to-all-the-covid-skeptics-who-were-right.html

Where is the NATIONAL APOLOGY to all the covid skeptics who were RIGHT?

Oh, you haven't been doing this for long.

You will never get an apology for being right before the crowd realized you were right.

What you will hear will be along the lines of "of course everybody knew this back then". I have gone through this more than once. You will be resented for being correct, not applauded. There's no reward for pointing out that the government lied, ever. You have shown the other person to be gullible and a fool, you never ever get an apology.

Patrick says


Haha - no - people actually like their dogs generally, that's why they have a useless eating and shitting machine. They are cute and lovable, they are manipulative, they are good at controlling you, it's charming.

We're more like cattle than pets. Pets are often valued.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/sweeping-reorganization-at-cdc-to

"sweeping reorganization" at CDC to "restore public trust"
that phrase may not mean what they hope you think it does

but then you read the text of the story and realize that it’s just the same people who have been such interminable fonts of incomprehension, disinformation, and outright fraud grabbing even more power and remaking an agency that is already a weapons grade dysfunction junction into one even more able to wreak mischief and menace upon the populace. ...

i mean, come on. pull my other paw, it plays jingle bells. ...

make no mistake: there is nothing trustworthy about this.

so, after 3 years of publishing inaccurate claim after inaccurate claim and studies that crossed well over the line into outright fraud, the solution is to find ways to publish even less well vetted “pre-publication” science and to “simplify” the website to justify providing even less data and to pull down all the evidence of things you got wrong without any pesky questions being asked?

because all that sounds like to me is a way to make sensational claims and prescriptions without having to provide any supporting data.

are we seriously calling that the road to regaining trust? ...

The agency has also been criticized throughout the pandemic for issuing public health guidance that some saw as confusing and ineffective.

Many also felt it wasn't moving fast enough to respond.

sorry, but:

this is what they think people are upset about and what lost public health agencies the public trust?

it wasn’t the fraudulent mask studies they published and the reams of made up guidance and guidelines that fell apart faster than knock off ikea furniture from uzbekistan?

it wasn’t pushing lookdowns that were known not to work and explicitly contra-indicated by 100 years of evidence based pandemic study?

it wasn’t claiming that the vaccines would provide herd immunity and become “a dead end for the virus” only to near instantly recant when the jabs failed to work as advertised?

or their total failure to even to the basic rudiments of their job and monitor the VAERS system for danger signals despite the biggest spike of reported vaccine adverse events in human history?

and then quietly erasing vaccine safety claims from their website? (just “streamline and simplify” i guess?)

and manipulating efficacy data and playing “hide the ball” with all cause death and cancer reporting? (see safety claims link above)

this is a classic false framing. you straw man a question no one asked and then answer it as though it resolves an objection in order to sidestep the real points of criticism and blame the victims for being unsatisfied.

but it’s pure farce.

The only thing that could regain trust in the CDC is a speedy trial, quick imprisonment, and possibly the public hanging of Pfizer-bot Walensky and everyone else who had anything to do with pushing the death jab on the public.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/white-house-covid-czar-admits-6-foot-social-distancing-rule-not-the-right-way_4670814.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

White House COVID Czar Admits 6-foot Social Distancing Rule ‘Not the Right Way’

White House COVID-19 czar Ashish Jha on Tuesday admitted that the six-foot social distancing rule that was implemented in early 2020 isn’t actually effective.

Over the past several years, “a lot of time” was spent “talking about six feet of distance, 15 minutes of being together. We realize that’s actually not the right way to think about this,” he said during a White House briefing on COVID-19.

“That’s not the most accurate way to think about this,” Jha said, adding that it is about “the quality of air you’re breathing around you.”

In a crowded indoor area with poor ventilation, people can “get infected” with COVID-19 “in minutes,” Jha said, adding that being outdoors you can be “outside for long periods of time” and not get infected. ...

The agency last week rescinded a number of rules and made key updates to its recommendations, now stating that unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals should essentially be treated the same, while explicitly saying that those with a prior infection have protection against severe illness. ...

A former administration for the Food and Drug Administration, Scott Gottlieb, revealed in late 2021 that the six-foot rule was made up.

“Nobody knows where it came from,” Gottlieb, *a Pfizer board member*, told CBS News.

https://resistthemainstream.org/ben-shapiro-warns-cdc-has-a-bigger-motive-behind-its-shake-up/

“If you actually wanted to shake-up the CDC, what you would do is use a little bit of epistemic humility. You’d actually look at their system and say, okay, what if we shrank what it is that we say that we can do?”

“But that’s not what the CDC is doing,” Shapiro explained. “Their argument is they need more power. Their big mistake is that they weren’t forceful enough during the last pandemic. So when they say shake-up, what they mean is give us more power.”

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-meaning-of-incredible/

The CDC seems to think nobody will notice its crimes, and the crimes of its sister agencies, FDA, NIAID, NIH (and the White House Task Force) if it strolls jauntily into the fall season whistling a happy a tune: Nevermind Covid anymore, la la la…. Did I say crimes? Yes, I did. As in gross violations of the law and the basic social contract.

They lied about their roles in the nefarious origins of SARS CoV-2. They conjured up — already had waiting, actually — dangerous genetic treatments masquerading as “vaccines” and then they faked the safety trials to rush them into use. They denied people proper, effective treatments with inexpensive drugs and killed them with ventilators and remdesivir — solely to maintain a fraudulent emergency use authorization (EUA) that shielded “vaccine” companies from lawsuits. Once the “vaccines’ were widely distributed — and forced upon many people with mandates — they confabulated and hid information about adverse reactions and deaths. They destroyed countless small businesses, livelihoods, households, and hindered children’s development with lockdowns. And they used both social and news media to censor their critics in direct violation of the first amendment. That’s all.

Oh, one more thing: they destroyed modern medicine. They will probably assist in the destruction of law, too, because the legal system will never be able to handle the volume of lawsuits against all parties involved in the Covid “vaccine” mass slaughter — including the corporations that forced their employees to get vaxxed and the pharma companies themselves, who will lose their EUA protections once their fraud is proven. And they will hasten the death of an already ailing financial system that can’t bear the wealth transfers implied in the foregoing (on top of the worst debt crisis in human history).

You think I exaggerate? We’re sailing into the flu season with millions of people whose immune systems are wrecked by multiple shots of mRNA novelty drugs. They are also susceptible to many viruses and bacteria which normally lurk in everybody’s bodily ecosystem, but would be controlled by otherwise healthy immune systems. Likewise, their hacked immune systems are no longer able to suppress cancers — many forms of which are already way up above normal statistical levels. Not to mention damage done to cardiovascular systems by spike proteins, which linger in human bodies for more than a year after “vaccine” shots, as well as neurological and brain damage.

Former Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd said yesterday (Aug 18) that a Society of Actuaries report just made public shows that a 20 percent uptick in excess deaths among working age people, which began with vaxx mandates in the fall of 2021, continued into the second quarter of 2022. Actuaries are the people who compile and analyze statistics for insurance companies.

So, all week the CDC has been walking-back one “guidance” after another. No more compulsory testing, no more contact-tracing, no more social distancing, no more treating the unvaxxed differently than the vaxxed (though the “Joe Biden” regime still won’t allow unvaxxed travelers into the USA), no more vaxx mandates (except, apparently, the US military). Oh, and they’ve conceded that their “vaccines” do not remain in the deltoid muscle, but actually leak all over the body. Note: whatever else the public health agencies are saying or doing right now, they are still promoting the mRNA vaccines, and lying about their safety and effectiveness — because if they told the truth, they would be completely discredited and surely subject to criminal prosecution. And they are still suppressing cheap and effective treatment protocols while promoting remdesivir and the useless (plus expensive) Paxlovid.

The CDC capped the week’s walk-back campaign by announcing a major overhaul of how the agency works. (The FDA and other public health entities made no such promises.) CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, fronting for other little-known federal bigwigs actually called in to clean-up after her, made the hilarious statement: “I look forward to working with the incredible people at CDC and our partners to realize the agency’s fullest potential to benefit the health and well-being of all Americans.” What a dim bulb. Does she know the definition of the word incredible? (Here it is: impossible to believe.)

Of course, the more sobering picture is that virtually all American institutions are now incredible, impossible to believe, starting from the top: “Joe Biden” as president. The executive branch of the government is being run by Barack Obama and a claque around him and is being run into the ground either on-purpose or out of astounding incompetence. Attorney General Merrick Garland flamboyantly disgraces the very idea of justice with Stalinesque political prosecutions. FBI Director Christopher Wray flouts every attempt to extract the truth about his agency’s operations, and at least half the country believes he’s turned it into a secret police operation like the Gestapo. The college presidents and deans have dishonored the idea of truth-seeking with their cowardly submission to Jacobin-Marxist maniacs and their program of anti-knowledge. And who in America really trusts his doctor? (Not me. Mine is the “chief medical officer” of my network and he’s still pushing “vaccines.”)

We allowed this to happen. We tolerated this exorbitant abuse by runaway authorities-gone-criminal. We let them get away with their bullshit about “defending our democracy” when they are actively and visibly destroying it. Serious people must be seriously asking themselves: what will it take to stop them now?

Patrick says

Former Wall Street analyst Edward Dowd said yesterday (Aug 18) that a Society of Actuaries report just made public shows that a 20 percent uptick in excess deaths among working age people, which began with vaxx mandates in the fall of 2021, continued into the second quarter of 2022. Actuaries are the people who compile and analyze statistics for insurance companies.

I thought it was 40%.

Patrick says

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-meaning-of-incredible/

no more treating the unvaxxed differently than the vaxxed

I think that only applies to quarantine rules. Interestingly none of the CDC guidance ever recommended that any institution require vaccination for anything. So I don’t see how the new CDC guidance is going to lead to any school, museum, theater, or employer stopping their vax-based discrimination. If anyone knows of any such institution changing their policy to treat the unvaccinated absolutely equally as a result of this new guidance, let me know.

"Let's see if we can rejuvenate whatever trust they still have in us to kill a few more. After all, Klaus has assured us that non-extradition estates await us next to Mengele's old South American ranch."

"Democrat Megadonor Parts Ways With Party Over COVID Vaccine Data"
https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrat-megadonor-parts-ways-with-party-over-covid-vaccine-data_4674361.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink
"The megadonor, Steve Kirsch, says that he has called everyone that he’s had any relationship with in the Democratic Party, including six members of Congress, trying to get some answers about the COVID vaccine injuries but asserts that no one picked up his calls.

“I’m disappointed in the lack of goals that they had and now becoming extremely disappointed that I can’t get a return phone call,” Kirsch told The Epoch Times."

It won't be long before all the calls are forwarded to Uruguay and Argentina.

Straight from the horse’s mouth:

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0811-covid-guidance.html

“Recommending screening [sic] testing of asymptomatic people without known exposures will no longer be recommended in most community settings.”

So what does this mean for places that have had a “vax or test negative” rule? Are these places dropping the test and if so will they admit all or exclude all unvaccinated as a result?

I’m sending the following query to offending institutions:

“The CDC no longer recommends screening the asymptomatic for COVID-19, and all their rules treat the vaccinated and unvaccinated the same. In light of this will you now be admitting in all visitors without them needing to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination or negative test for? If not, why not?”

I’m guessing they will all keep their policy precisely because the CDC is acknowledged by all to be irrelevant. The sword cuts both ways.

Undoctored says

Interestingly none of the CDC guidance ever recommended that any institution require vaccination for anything.

Does this mean my friend who was fired for refusing the jab can sue her ex employer?

@Onvacation she will have a good chance if she requested a religious accommodation and it was refused. See this case, where the settlement terms were drawn up even before the CDC’s August revision:

https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/629535956-northshore-to-pay-10m-to-settle-covid-vax-mandate-lawsuit-fired-workers-could-get-25k-and-their-jobs-back

But every institution with any kind of vaccination requirement is doing so without the blessing of the CDC. Seems like a clear cut violation of the ADA to me. The CDC has never determined that the medical category of “unvaccinated” poses a direct threat so no discrimination at all is allowed regardless of religion. So yeah, go ahead and sue. This should have been done long ago.

Undoctored says

@Onvacation she will have a good chance if she requested a religious accommodation and it was refused

For fucks sake, it's a valid excuse that "I believe the great invisible entity in the sky forbids this", but "this doesn't make any fucking sense to me, and you can't explain how it makes any sense - so fuck you" is not valid.

I swear to god, the whole purpose is to push society into insanity or to at least claim insanity.

There's religious exemptions, but not RATIONAL exemptions.

This is an untested serum for a disease which kills practically nobody, and if the serum actually works, the only people at risk, are the people that refused the serum. If, however, the untested serum doesn't work, it can harm or even kill the person that takes it.

This is logical, can't be refuted, it's entirely logical and consistent, but people have to appeal to a supposed believe in god.

richwicks says

Undoctored says

@Onvacation she will have a good chance if she requested a religious accommodation and it was refused

For fucks sake, it's a valid excuse that "I believe the great invisible entity in the sky forbids this", but "this doesn't make any fucking sense to me, and you can't explain how it makes any sense - so fuck you" is not valid.

I swear to god, the whole purpose is to push society into insanity or to at least claim insanity.

There's religious exemptions, but not RATIONAL exemptions.

This is an untested serum for a disease which kills practically nobody, and if the serum actually works, the only people at risk, are the people that refused the serum. If, however, the untested serum doesn't work, it can harm or even kill the person that takes it.

This is logical, can't be refuted, it's entirely logical and consistent, but people h...

Of course your anger is justified. The 2 biggest ideals this country was founded on have been trampled over a fakedemic....Freedom and Religion.

GNL says

Freedom and Religion.

Actually it's "liberty and justice". Many immigrated to America to get away from religion.

And liberty and justice have been trampled on in America.

One thing that defines a religion is what it says you should and should not put into your body. Most religions have their dietary and bodily purity laws. When CDC recommendations (they do recommend vaccines for individuals don’t get me wrong) and guidelines are enforced, we get the “establishment of religion” prohibited by the constitution. Don’t forget, religious freedom also means nonbelievers have the right to not participate in a religion. Claim your religious freedom from the Church of Deceptive Countermeasures today!

richwicks says

There's religious exemptions, but not RATIONAL exemptions.

This is true. You can't get a death jab exemption based on reason, only based on things you can't prove at all.

But seriously. In theory at least you can rightfully file a religious accommodation claim without being religious, because “sincerely held moral beliefs” also count.

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-religious-discrimination-workplace

Religious beliefs include theistic beliefs (i.e. those that include a belief in God) as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.”

Perhaps for example you think it is wrong to comply with an order that violates a basic human right?

In any case I agree the Propaganda masters are trying to spin this as a matter of scientific fact vs irrational belief, so they want to make you think you need to confess your irrationality to preserve your right to refuse medication. But it’s really a matter of irrational CDC dogma vs common sense.

The fact is, you can refuse to follow the CDC’s proclamations as a matter of religion, science, or sincerely held moral principle.

Undoctored says

But seriously. In theory at least you can rightfully file a religious accommodation claim without being religious, because “sincerely held moral beliefs” also count.

@Undoctored

In practice, 100% of “sincerely held moral beliefs” are denied.

Learned this from a religious exemption workshop I attended. The law is irrelevant because it is completely ignored by appointed officials and there is zero recourse. They have absolute power, and they are almost entirely Democrats.

This just in:

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0901-covid-19-booster.html

The following is attributable to Dr. Walensky:

“The updated COVID-19 boosters are formulated to better protect against the most recently circulating COVID-19 variant. They can help restore protection that has waned since previous vaccination and were designed to provide broader protection against newer variants. This recommendation followed a comprehensive scientific evaluation and robust scientific discussion. If you are eligible, there is no bad time to get your COVID-19 booster and I strongly encourage you to receive it.”

Wasn’t Dr Walensky recently quoted as saying the CDC had been a too “optimistic”? Has she learned her lesson? Well for one now there’s no actual claim of efficacy at all, not 95% not even 30% just some vague “help restore protection.” But there’s been a “robust” scientific discussion. Wait shouldn’t we ask our doctor if it’s right for us first? Oh, “there is no bad time” huh? You don’t know a thing about me but you “strongly urge” me to take it? I mean wow if they were recklessly optimistic before what’s this?

A little longwinded. She should just say: "DIE, FUCKING USELESS EATER COCKROACHES, FUCKING DIE NOW!"

Patrick says

In practice, 100% of “sincerely held moral beliefs” are denied.

What would Jesus do? Well, he did work with lepers, unvaccinated, without a mask.

Onvacation says

Patrick says

In practice, 100% of “sincerely held moral beliefs” are denied.

What would Jesus do? Well, he did work with lepers, unvaccinated, without a mask.

Well to be fair, if Jesus is what he supposedly was, he was pretty much immune.

Give me super powers and I'll freely work with lepers and homosexuals with monkeypox, and do it with no income with no fear of starvation. Probably would be a bad idea to give me this power, I'd make it illegal to kill spiders and roaches probably - after all, they are god's creatures too. I'd go crazy with super powers.

richwicks says

Give me super powers and I'll freely work with lepers and homosexuals with monkeypox

I wouldn't

G'night everyone.

richwicks says

I'd make it illegal to kill spiders

I had a kind of Buddhist phase about 20 years ago, and stopped killing spiders because it seemed like bad karma. I've continued that. We have clear plastic cups and postcards to capture them and toss them out a window.

But I continued to kill mosquitoes and have no regrets about that.

https://www.blacklocks.ca/tips-on-rejecting-vax-claims/

Department of Transport lawyers coached airlines on how to reject Canadians’ requests for vaccine waivers on religious grounds, according to Access To Information memos. Even passengers with legitimate claims were to be challenged every time they switched flights, wrote staff: “These types of exemptions are anticipated to be granted very rarely.”

paywall

https://rumble.com/v1huu31-the-cdc.html


original link


The CDC has done all of this shit before, with the Swine Flu vaxx, for example.

Just to have the video cover image:

https://babylonbee.com/news/cdc-warns-of-new-stealth-covid-variant-where-you-test-negative-and-get-no-symptoms

ATLANTA, GA — CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky held a press conference to warn the public about a deadly new "stealth" COVID-19 variant that causes negative test results and causes no symptoms.

"This deadly variant has bypassed our most sophisticated tests by ingeniously becoming harmless to the human body," said Director Walensky, "It is estimated that eight billion people have caught this variant. We must prevent it from spreading further by closing schools and locking up kindergarten children."

The CDC director's guidance to close schools and stem the tide of this "stealth" variant is backed by data that has been thoroughly and rigorously altered, proving that public school teachers are the most susceptible, testing negative a whopping 100% of the time and often succumbing to the worst symptom-free symptoms.

At publishing time, Pfizer had announced early development of a new, 103% effective vaccine, followed 3.8 seconds later by approval from the FDA.

"In the same way"?

Not at all, ever.